1
   

The News Shocker Of The Year

 
 
Reply Sat 23 Apr, 2005 09:23 am
A few lower level military get cooked and the top brass get acquitted. Wow, who could have seen that coming? Rolling Eyes

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/04/22/abu.ghraib.brass.ap/index.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 846 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
rodeman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Apr, 2005 12:23 pm
bvt

We can't go to far up the chain of command. That's what we have cannon fodder, er, pfc's, etc. for
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Apr, 2005 02:47 pm
No surprise, but we could hope, couldn't we?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Apr, 2005 02:52 pm
There's no hope but Mt. Hope
0 Replies
 
RfromP
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 12:29 am
It is impossible to believe that a rouge bunch of lower enlisted soldiers were left alone to the own devices to operate a prison with no supervision in the middle of a hostile country during a war. It's so implausible that what we saw in those pictures wasn't seen by someone in charge. Those soldiers didn't conspire to wake up in the middle of the night when their superiors were asleep and do what they did. It was done in broad daylight during duty hours when their supervisors were there without fear of them being discovered. Where were their bosses? At the movies? Grocery shopping? Kicking back at a bar-b-q sucking back some cold ones? I don't think so.

The brass claims to not know it was going on and didn't see a thing. They then at least should be charged with dereliction of duty for failure to properly supervise their troops since they so readily admit they had no idea what their own subordinates were doing. What if those same troops were attacked and wiped out by an enemy force? Who would be accountable then? Would their bosses stick to the same story? We didn't know so that makes it not our fault.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 05:47 am
I seem to recall that at the Nuremberg war crimes trials, following World War II, not a single private or NCO or junior officer was tried for running concentration camps. They were, after all, just following orders. No, the generals went on trial. But I also recall that after the revelations about the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, only a lowly lieutenant, Calley, was thrown to the wolves. No one even suggested putting Gen. Westmoreland on trial. The logic of "who's in charge here?" has been sadly reversed.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 05:53 am
I'm waiting for the insurgents to try their people for executing prisoners.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 06:23 am
From what I have heard, it was mostly the night shift, when the big supervisors were not there.

Anyone who has ever worked in industry knows the night shift gets away with things the day shift can't. Of course, in industry these things consist of taking half hour coffee breaks instead of 10 minutes and surreptitious beer runs, as opposed to stripping prisoners naked and siccing vicious dogs on them.

The fact that it was the night shift lessens the ability of the higher ups to know what is going on somewhat, but you are not going to tell me that a bunch of 19 and 20 year old kids stuck together in this foreign land will not communicate to each other any bizarre happenings, especially since it went on so long. The soldiers have nobody but themselves to talk to-it's not like they can go off the compound, go into town and have a few beers, meet the townspeople and have a life separate from the military.

The day shift, supervisors as well as the lower ranks, had to have had a general idea of what was going on. Soldiers talk to each other, and try to tell stories to top each other.
0 Replies
 
Trupolitik
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 06:18 pm
Re: The News Shocker Of The Year
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
A few lower level military get cooked and the top brass get acquitted. Wow, who could have seen that coming? Rolling Eyes

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/04/22/abu.ghraib.brass.ap/index.html



Agreed. The government should have "taken the hit" and said "Yep, sexual humilation is an effective psychological technique especially for muslim males".
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 06:23 pm
Re: The News Shocker Of The Year
Trupolitik wrote:
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
A few lower level military get cooked and the top brass get acquitted. Wow, who could have seen that coming? Rolling Eyes

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/04/22/abu.ghraib.brass.ap/index.html



Agreed. The government should have "taken the hit" and said "Yep, sexual humilation is an effective psychological technique especially for muslim males".


but they didn't, therefore someone up top is responsible. "Mean what you say or say what you mean, either one will do", said my plain talk Presbyterian ministers daughter grandmother.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 May, 2005 11:32 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
I'm waiting for the insurgents to try their people for executing prisoners.

Natch. We baseline all of our morals and ethics on what folks in other countries do, right?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The News Shocker Of The Year
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 02:36:56