No, no, I certainly don't mean any offense, if that's what you mean,
and apologise if it was upsetting.
Quote:If you take all your knowledge from someone else, how can you think for yourself?
I don't think it's an all-or-nothing situation. Taking some knowledge
from others, and being spoon-fed some answers, can be good practice.
Then, when facing an industry or business situation we can compete effectively.
At work, we do research all the time, and if we can find the answer given
to us for free by somebody else, that's a really good skill to have.
Study skills and research skills, and knowing where to go for quick answers
seem very valuable. Why make things harder than they need to be?
Quote:I think it's a problem to teach that the easy way out is ok. It might be easier but it isn't always the best.
It seems like a good engineer (for instance) is basically lazy, always trying to find the
easiest and cheapest solution. Free information and free ideas ... are free.
Also, the idea of building ones own research based on the research
and input of others, is a pretty fundamental part of science.
Even when writing a newspaper article, I've heard you can't get it
published unless you reference at LEAST three sources.
That's a good example, right there. I got that information from a
journalist friend... not my idea... Does that make me a thief?
Quote:Do you think that this writing is in any way acceptable?
At least you can read mine and it makes sense.
To hand you the answer, straight out?
I think any writing that communicates successfully ... is acceptable.
Both your writing styles actually did work.
Further, in this context, here on A2K it worked great.
The issue has many sides to it, . . . worth thinking about!
How do you think it SHOULD be?