Chrissee wrote:kelticwizard wrote:And the money from the American Catholics continues to pour in, which is the goal of the entire exercise.
Money to feed the homeless. )Money to help addicts get off drugs. Money to help AIDS victims. Money to help abused children. Money to...well, you get the picture.
Yes, some of it goes for that, but much of it goes right back to Rome.
Look, Chrissee, the Catholic Church has vast financial resources, and America is the single largest source of those financial resources.
The molestation scandal, which has been revealed for some twenty years but played down by the media here, was exploding and had the potential to wreck that source of income. Clearly, something had to be done.
The answer clearly is: blame the liberals, use the free publicity and momentum of a new Pope to purge the church of these liberals, tell the world that you are ridding yourself of the problem by doing this. Ratzinger is the "heavy".
If their are any excesses, it barely matters since there likely will be a new Pope in five years anyway. The fellow after Ratzinger will be selected for being a Nice Guy, shall vaguely hint that things could have been done perhaps a bit differently, and talks about healing.
Ratzinger was known as a hard liner since forever. Why would they select him, at his age, if that was not the plan?