Re: Frist Set to Use Religious Stage on Judicial Issue
oh, yum yum. just what the doctor ordered.
fribbley wrote:au1929 wrote:
Divisiveness is what the republicans are selling. Playing one segment of the population against the other. That is a dangerous game and what oppression and revolution lives upon. Dictators come to power using that tactic. Divide and conquer. Is that what you want or shoud expect from your government leaders. That they act like, and I will go out on the limb. religious Nazi's
NAZIS!!! My my!
A newbie pats one of Skinner's DU wayward flock!
This is my first post, and I feel completely confident patting you (au1929) on the top of your head and whispering 'there-there' in your dumb-head. DU is truly for DUmmies. I thought this was supposed to be a place where intelligent people could debate the issues and ideas of the day without having to suffer the idiocy of DUers....
au1929, you have NO credibility...everyone's patting you on the head.
Link the Nazis with modern American politics of left or right, and I might cut you some slack... but you don't deserve any.
Your arguments are idiotic, and it's up to the Left to defend their assertions that Conservatism=Naziism.
Leftism/Liberalism is far more conducive to Naziism than our Constitution.
When the Right accuses liberals of "fascism," it almost always does so in an effort to obscure its own fascist proclivities -- and it reminds the rest of us just whose footsoldiers are in reality merrily goosestepping down the national garden path.
I have seen some really outrageous stuff from you right wing $hit bags on this site these last few months but your attempt to paint Nazis with the brush of socialism due to the name of their political party takes the cake and is disgraceful, not only for the fundamental distortion of Nazi political and economical positions but more as an attempt by you to cast its evil as a natural extension of socialism, and thus positioning you at God's right hand against the scourge of collective citizen action in the economic and political arena
Only morons consider Hitler a socialist (totally misunderstanding that the name National Socialist Workers Party had little to do with socialism or "leftist" political thought)
forgetting or perhaps never even knowing that one of the first things Hitler did when he took power was jail both the communists and socialists. From your viewpoint, even that old 19th century reactionary Otto von Bismarck was also a socialist because he proposed the first social security laws for old people (actually a deceitful thing, for a quick check of the actuary tables of the Prussian people in the late 1800's showed that few ever lived to the age of 65).
But the logic of your agenda is clear, regardless of its faulty reasoning, sophism, or lack of confirmation to or with objective reality. You wish to describe anyone that believes in the collective power of the citizenry as "leftist" and declare it alien to the American spirit, whatever that is.
Most likely, your idea of America is a Hitlerian wet dream with a Madison Avenue mask.
To the details and the examples:
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
Hermann Goering
Sounds like your beloved Reich Marshall was prescient about the Bushevik lies about Iraq.
So, I guess that counts as one link between Conservatism (in America today more aptly defined as Reaganism) and Nazism
So there is the link you call for connecting Nazism with what you so generously refer to as "Conservatism."
Shall we try another? You know, actually Hitler was against abortion. Did that make him a liberal or conservative?
Perhaps another?
While the very name of the Nazis, viz., National Socialist Workers Party proclaims it as socialist, Hitler was vague indeed on the type of "socialism" he envisaged for Germany.
His view on "socialism," stated in a speech he gave on July 28, 1922:
"Adolph Hitler Reden," p.32, quoted by Bullock
That sounds like good old American-style patriotism with a conservative twist, not liberalism
There was no Bolshevik or socialist attempt at revolution in the winter of 1933, regardless of the efforts of Goering and von Papen to incite one in the press. By February of that year, Hitler had banned all communist meetings and had shut down the communist press. Social democratic rallies were banned or disrupted, and within weeks all socialist newspapers were shut down as well. Socialism, as an economic political philosophy of redistribution of national wealth as is generally considered by reasonable persons was dead in the Third Reich
The major industrialists in Germany backed Hitler and from these he drew his funding to act as a counterbalance against the communists and socialists. To even venture to call Hitler a socialist is nonsense, becoming of a person whose bowels inhabit his brain, and their expression subsequent thought.
Actually, since you appear as nothing more but another in a long line of ignorant freepers who wandered on to this site, you might want to educate yourself about what are the differences between the economic and political systems you threw together like a 3 year old finger painting.
You don't seem to be the sharpest pencil in the box, (Freepers never are) and as not to take unfair advantage of your now illustrated intellectual capabilities, how about you define your terms for nazism, liberalism, conservatism, and communism, so you don't get all confused and flustered, this being you're new here.
Start a thread big guy, called "communism, socialism, liberalism, and fascism; what are they" and why don't you define them for the rest of us. I can assure you that whatever you post will be served right back at you and down your freeper throat.
Pick up the gauntlet Mr. Freeper, after all, in your bizarre universe only liberals are cowardly pussies.
