@okie,
okie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote: I can't see anyone who doesn't have a problematic history.Cycloptichorn
According to who, you? Of course any Republican has a problematic history according to you. But problematic histories mean nothing when its a Democrat, such as hobnobbing with Communists and domestic Terrorists, no problem at all, right cyclops? Fact is, maybe its a resume enhancement as far as you are concerned?
Not according to me, Okie - but according to your fellow Republicans. I certainly don't use MY lens to decide who your party is going to put forward.
But, since I'm so wrong, why don't you go ahead and point out who the front-runners are? And convince me that it's just my partisanship that says they have problems as candidates.
Regarding Obama's history, the country firmly didn't give a ****. You ought to accept that fact. At the time you predicted the opposite...
Quote:And one of Obama's greatest accomplishments was he won an election, whoopee doo, cyclops!
That's not one of his 'greatest' accomplishments, Okie. But it is fair to say that the guy is good at winning elections, and when you are looking for a candidate to, yaknow,
win an election, how is it a bad thing to have a good track record?
Cycloptichorn