@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote: and then go on to demolish your 2012 candidate (who is strangely still completely anonymous).
I pick this out as a strange comment, cyclops. Good grief, we are still 2 years away from the next presidential election. Maybe Republicans like the idea of seeing healthy competition for being the candidate, that is what primaries and all of that are for. After all, some of us do not believe that a person should be coronated by virtue of their name or something. I don't even think Obama should be automatically nominated to run, after all, what has he done so special?
Quote:Unlike some others, I never went Gaga over Obama's ability to turn things around on a dime. It takes time to change things, and I think that he's done pretty well so far - but will have several more years to get stuff done.
Cycloptichorn
I still go back to what McCain said, it isn't change that is the issue, its what kind of change? So far, the change we have seen has been for the worse. I am all for change, as McCain said he was, if it is the right kind of change, such as get rid of the corrupt rascals in Washington. We could start with Fannie and Freddie, which represents part of the entire mechanism of the housing collapse that started this whole mess, and so far we've seen absolutely nothing. Not even a token effort, nothing.