114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 06:19 pm
@parados,
Schiff recently advocated the elimination of the minimum wage as the solution to unemployment.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 06:39 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:

Schiff recently advocated the elimination of the minimum wage as the solution to unemployment.


That certainly wouldn't hurt the terrible unemployment situation we have under Obama's rule.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 06:55 pm
@realjohnboy,
Did squirt say anything of value worth reading? I doubt it.
0 Replies
 
tenderfoot
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 07:56 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

H2O MAN wrote:


If America's education system was worth a **** we
would have more executives earning executive pay.



And nobody would watch Fox News.

Izzy, how very true, Fox has some very good programs, but it amazes me how they do put downs on Obama and his party every chance they get
0 Replies
 
tenderfoot
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Feb, 2013 08:00 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Mr. Green Mr. Green squirt doesn't understand what he's talking about 99% of the time; or is that 99.99% of the time?

Even idiots deserve .01% respect. Mr. Green Mr. Green

I give him 0.ooooooooooooo1 per cent
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 07:43 am
You ladies are cackling like a bunch of chickens Laughing
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 09:10 am


Exclamation You are a special kind of stupid if you think
this country does not have a spending problem
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 09:45 am


Didn't Obama and his minions recently state that 'jobs' were priority #1

What happened, did they just lie to the American public again?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 01:05 pm


Obamanomics and the rising cost of gas in the US will further damage our economy...

Gas prices on the rise again

WHAT’S GOING ON WITH THE PRICE OF GAS?
Rickoshay75
 
  0  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 02:22 pm
@au1929,
au1929 wrote:

Harbingers of Harder Times


Published: March 12, 2005

At $58.3 billion, the United States' trade deficit for January exceeded everyone's worst expectations. The huge mismatch reported yesterday between imports and exports just missed breaking the monthly record, set last November, and is all the more remarkable for occurring in a month when the price of oil actually declined.

The trade deficit is the single most important factor in measuring the extent to which the nation lives beyond its means. As such, it should force us to own up to the dangers of rampant deficit spending. But the White House is showing no sign of action, as if doing nothing might make the problem smaller.

In response to yesterday's trade deficit figure, the dollar weakened against the euro and the yen, and traders predicted further declines in the weeks and months ahead. That, in turn, contributed to a drop in stock and bond prices. Such gyrations are certainly not unprecedented. The dollar has been on a downward trajectory for three straight years and was going into a fresh skid even before the latest trade deficit figure was released.

That slump was largely in response to recent reports, some later denied, that Asian central bankers may begin moving their huge dollar holdings into other currencies. That would mean higher interest rates in the United States because the government would need to sweeten Treasury yields, and higher interest rates imply further declines in stock and bond prices. A declining dollar also risks higher inflation; more expensive imports give domestic producers an excuse to raise prices.

There may be more trouble to come. Next week, the government will release figures showing how much capital flowed into the United States from abroad in January. Those numbers were down by nearly one-third in December. If next week's report is disappointing, the logical response from the currency markets would be to sell dollars - again raising the threat of all the possible side effects.

Since the trade deficit is intimately connected to the federal budget deficit, the best way to reduce the trade imbalance is to reduce the budget gap. But President Bush is calling for more tax cuts, politically implausible spending cuts and costly Social Security privatization. Both parties in Congress must address the twin trade and budget deficits - or risk being forced to do so by events beyond their control.

Do you believe that the US may be approaching economic disaster? If so what can or should the administration and congress do to avert it?


That budget is based on prior commitments we have to honor, but no new money to create jobs, the real problem. If we want to end the recession, we must invest more stimulation money, go even deeper in debt, like all the prior administrations did.

There is no absolute point of view from which real and ideal can be finally separated and labelled. T S Eliot
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 03:19 pm
@Rickoshay75,
au wrote,
Quote:

Do you believe that the US may be approaching economic disaster? If so what can or should the administration and congress do to avert it?


Our government is broken, and they are also stupid.

On the GOP side, they will not allow any tax increases for the rich. That's just stupid!

The liberals can make adjustments to social security and Medicare now to prevent future problems, but they won't.

They're both stupid!

Let the sequesture begin! Goodbye USA.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 03:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:



Let the sequesture begin! Goodbye USA.


It's spelled s-e-q-u-e-s-t-e-r and Obama wants sequestration to happen so he can blame everybody else for the situation that he
himself created and then swoop in to 'save the day' with some hair brained plan that will only exacerbate a terrible situation.
realjohnboy
 
  3  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 04:05 pm
@H2O MAN,
H-a-r-e-b-r-a-i-n-e-d.
Not meaning to split hairs.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 04:16 pm
@realjohnboy,

Laughing I had to hide an Easter egg so cicegirls self-esteem wasn't totally trashed.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 04:16 pm
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_iKcZ3qcCmyo/S9sdTSxfdqI/AAAAAAAARB4/K1aY25FvsG8/s1600/bio2.jpg
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 06:08 pm

http://www.regnery.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/AtTheBrinkJustCover-202x306.jpg



Obama’s new health care system is not only going to plunge the country into debt, but it destroys the incentives that are the key to delivering timely, quality care – all because to Obama, “profit” is a dirty word.


Obama’s failed economic “recovery” has only worsened the employment and living conditions of all Americans, hitting two groups particularly hard: recently-graduated Americans under 25, and seniors…and things are only going to get worse.


In the name of helping homeowners, Obama has actually worsened the housing crisis, damaging the market for homeowners and home buyers alike; and his prolific regulations have wreaked havoc in more than just that segment of the economy.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 06:17 pm
@H2O MAN,
A democratic bifurcation always involves wreaking damage in some segment or other.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 06:21 pm
@spendius,
But Obama is different, his policies are wreaking havoc and causing damage everywhere.
0 Replies
 
Rickoshay75
 
  0  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 09:12 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:

Schiff recently advocated the elimination of the minimum wage as the solution to unemployment.


Those who are into manufacturing know that workers are only hired when needed, and laid off when not needed. It has nothing to do with how much they are paid, so the 2 dollar Minimum wage hike opposition is a nothing but a political red herring.

There is no absolute point of view from which real and ideal can be finally separated and labelled. T S Eliot
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Feb, 2013 09:54 pm
@Rickoshay75,
What you say is true; minimum wage doesn't affect hiring or firing of workers. That's been proven in San Francisco where the minimum wage is now $10.55/hour. The unemployment rate in San Francisco is 7.7% while the California unemployment rate is 9.8%.

It's political, as you say, and it has nothing to do with the creation of jobs or lack thereof.
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.28 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 03:46:57