Evolution? How?

edgarblythe wrote:

You nailed it, Chumly.

He nailed his own thumb... Smile

How about if you hold the nail for him?

0 Replies

Creation covers evolution but evolution has no hind sight so it is a microcosm within evident creation.

0 Replies

edgarblythe wrote:

You can interpret information pointing to evolution as pointing to purple people eaters. Don't make it so. Evolution does not tackle questions relating to creation. Therefore, you can think what you will and scientists won't argue with you. You just can't put it in the science classroom simply because you think it.

EB, let's not act naive.

Evolution-abiogenesis-Big bang are all sold in one slick package in the government school science classroom.

0 Replies

Was the "big bang" evolution?

So the big bang is evidence we were not created?

On the contrary... the big bang only points to a moment of creation not evolution.

0 Replies

Evolution is biology. Do you see any biology in big bangs and etcetera?

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Chumly wrote:

What clearly bothers many Creationists / ID'ers / Religionists about science is that science has no need or use for god or religion, at all.

That is un proven...

RexRed,

You're going to have to try a lot harder than such a meek protestation.

There is evidence in abundance because (among other reasons) many Creationists / ID'ers / Religionists are adamant to have their brand of religious dogma taught as science. Even you repeat over and over that science is inherently hobbled and blind because it exempts god.

A least you have at times elicited a scrap of sophistic self-deprecating humor and play a bit of guitar, so all is not horribly lost. Given that, I am sure you understand it's only a matter of time before complete conversion to godlessness.

0 Replies

real, Rex...Bullshit.

The science class room teaches all aspects of science, and contrary to your paranoia, religion enters into it precisely the same number of times the evidence suggests a paranormal cause for things...which is precisley zero.

Cosmology and Biology are such totally different sciences that the only time they ever get mentioned together is by paranoid defensive religious fanatics who think it's all part of a big conspiracy to disprove their gods and their magic.

You guys know this, you're just peddling the same old propaganda.

0 Replies

Getting past the bias is like shoveling quicksand. It fills in every bit as fast as you work the shovel.

0 Replies

Stick with the logic.

So science is going to disprove creation by using existence? Hahahahaha!

0 Replies

Joseph Goebbels could not do as well in trying to sell Creationism and debunk science if he were alive today. Wait, are we sure he is not?

0 Replies

Edgar you describe a left wing, ACLU, political corporate science not true objective pure unadulterated science.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Stick with the logic.

Here is a thread tailor-made for your logic.

0 Replies

Rex, you wouldn't know science if it gave you a big sloppy kiss and patted you on the rump.

0 Replies

edgarblythe wrote:

Rex, you wouldn't know science if it gave you a big sloppy kiss and patted you on the rump.

Haha, was that science?

0 Replies

Me being a wise ass and disengaging from the srgument. Got to get ready for next week. G' nite owl.

0 Replies

RL's paranoid that science will slip him the tongue.

0 Replies

Good debate Edgar, thanks...

0 Replies

Hardly debate.

It's like trying to convince a three year that no amount of wishing will make him fly.

0 Replies

How can science be practical for every day life when answers are so far away from the current "wall"? We need to guess in order to test the unknown...

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

How can science be practical for every day life when answers are so far away from the current "wall"? We need to guess in order to test the unknown...

yes but at least you can test things .... unlike creationism rhetoric

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know