ehBeth wrote:Eva - they were talking about, and doing, the same things 35 years ago when I was in public school. Servicing, pregnant 11 and 12 year olds, it was happening then - and 35 years before that. Perhaps not as often as now, but happening.
It's sort of a weird dichotomy. Sex is talked about more as a bad thing now, at the same time that it's talked about less as a good thing. Or at least that's how it seems when I look at a lot of U.S. media. Something tempting about those bad things, makin' kids do even more than when we were told the urges were natural (I'm a teen of the 1970's, and that's what they taught us in school) and healthy, and that anyone who told us otherwise was wrong.
Sheesh. I had a really nice, long post all typed out and lost it when my server disconnected. I will reconstruct.
I was a teenager in the late '60s with parents who were still firmly ensconced in the '50s. My mother awkwardly attempted to explain the facts of life to me when I was about 10 or 11. She said that when a man and woman were facing each other, their bodies fit together. That was all she could manage to get out. I was lost...did that mean that the woman's face fit into the indentation where the man's neck was, then her chest fit into the dip where his stomach was, etc., all the way down? And what the heck did that have to do with babies? Months later I finally pieced it all together from what I had heard here and there....and man, was I shocked!
Girls who "went all the way" were called whores. So nobody ever ever ever admitted it. Not that there wasn't plenty going on...just that nobody ever talked about it. They certainly never said it was "natural"! That was a revelation to us when we got to college in the '70s. I lost my virginity during the summer between highschool and college. My boyfriend of 1-1/2 years (my first love) and I were both virgins at the time, so we had to figure it all out for ourselves. Which was FUN! It was a good experience. But of course, we didn't admit anything to anyone for years.
I'm so glad it's all more open now, for my son's sake. I like soz's approach of "abstinence plus" best. That seems like the most reasonable way.
That's interesting, squinney & soz. Nobody ever explained to me about x-rays, chemicals, etc....ever.