2
   

The subordinate clause from hell

 
 
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2018 04:05 pm
IN the following sentence translated from German,

"Regardless of how frequently one repeats the theorem of Pythagoras, regardless of whom it is that thinks it, or where and when it happens, it will remain identically the same, although the concrete act of meaning will change in each case"


-- I'm pretty sure the "whom" should be "who" but the sentence is so complex that I would appreciate a grammatical analysis.
 
centrox
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2018 04:27 pm
I balk at the analysis, but you are correct about 'whom'. It should be 'who'.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Sun 11 Mar, 2018 11:54 pm
@Jedothek ,
All of the other clauses are modifiers of the main clause, "it will remain identically the same."
0 Replies
 
PUNKEY
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2018 03:33 pm
I think it would be:

regardless who thinks it

regardless of whom it is that thinks it (the "of" changes the clause structure, making whom an object pronoun.)



centrox
 
  3  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2018 04:37 pm
@PUNKEY,
PUNKEY wrote:
regardless who thinks it

1. Regardless is usually followed by 'of' in these circumstances.
2. The correct object pronoun to follow this 'of' is 'who'.


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The subordinate clause from hell
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 09:21:21