From that SPTimes article:
Quote:Friends and neighbors, meantime, described the Dollars as religious and strict, and said the children hardly ever were seen.
"Hardly ever were seen" ... this is the part about America I find kind of scary (had a lot of conversations about it) ... I mean, here everyone is obliged to register with the city, its the basis for everything - without registration no passport, no voting rights, no house, no benefits - everyone legal is registered, period. I understand that in America there's no central registration of people, period? That makes it so much easier for (malevolant) people to just "disappear" in between the cracks! And school, we have compulsory education until 16 here for every kid, theres no freedom to just keep your child at home; if they dont turn up, they're looked up to see whats wrong. Now perhaps some good parents would actually do a better job by themselves at home, but at least this prevents kids just disappearing with such ease ... is there no check like that in the States?
(I'm not saying such things dont happen here - they do, we've had some brutal horror stories here last year. Just, it raised these questions for me)
Quote:"They seemed to move around a lot, and they seemed to acquire children everywhere they'd go," Stanley said.
Doesnt the child protection agency (or some such institution) keep an eye out on adopted children, at least for a few years? And dont they use stability of residence as a criterium when awarding people the opportunity to adopt a kid? Moving every other year isnt good for kids, adopted kids even less, in any case, and when people move all the time, theres no social control ... it would be a smart criterium! And how can a family adopt so many kids and just move around with no monitoring of the childrens' welfare at all, apparently?