Reply
Tue 23 Jan, 2018 08:09 am
Oxford explains "nicks" as nothing. It appears not suitable to the context below.
Trump has left lots of official positions empty in the White House. He's sloppy with them. Is it what Layman meant?
Context:
layman wrote:
Crazy Jim? It fits, I guess, but Trump is getting a little sloppy with his nicks, doncha think? I mean, like, why not something like "Jackass Jim," I wonder?
Source
@oristarA,
Now arises the q, can it be two words
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:
Now arises the q, can it be two words
I see they have it there, eh, Dale? "Nick" is just a nick for nickname, eh?
Selected Answer
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace