71
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:27 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

So let's see. If replacing one bulb would accomplish all that, if we replaced ALL the bulbs currently in our home with CFLs, I think that would be a total of 32 bulbs give or take one or two in my house, According to the calculations in the quoted paragraph, we would then be saving enough energy to light more than 96 million homes and reduce greenhouse gas emissions the equivalent of that produced by more than 25.6 million automobiles. That would pretty much take care of all the energy needed for virtually all the homes in the USA and an offset of emissions for around 1/3 or so of the cars.

If it would be that easy to reverse AGW and/or meet IPPC standards, why wasn't that one of the suggested mandates?

Or did whoever wrote that miss something?

I think we could call it enviro-math. Some of the figures I hear, I intuitively know they are probably full of it, but don't care to waste my time checking it all the time. With as much "rain forest" that was being cut down there for a while, there would have been no rain forest by now. Funny, we don't hear that one much anymore. I still remember when I was a kid in the 50's, all the topsoil would be gone in 10 years or so at the rate of erosion due to farming, but lets see, that has been 50 years ago now, and there still seems to be lots of dirt across Oklahoma and Kansas, or anywhere else.

I love the carbon credits math. All we have to do is plant enough trees and I can still drive my gas guzzlers, jetset like Gore, and I can be a net energy gain. Enviro-math. That would be a good term. I haven't looked it up, so there might already be a term coined for it.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:28 pm
miniTAX wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
miniTAX wrote:
... not to speak of the incompatibilty with dimmers...


How do you call the "dimmers" which are used with lampes fluorescente compactes? They work perfectly well - and look at least similar to what is generally named dimmer.
Dimmers (variators if you like) DON'T work on CFL. Maybe you'll find a few but most don't, just look at the wrapping. Mine tells this: "ne pas utiliser avec variateurs de lumières, commutateurs électroniques, cellules photoélectriques, minuteries et détecteur".



Actually there are over 40 bulbs that do according to this website.

http://www.pathnet.org/sp.asp?id=23506
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:28 pm
miniTAX wrote:
I'm against the fact that the danger of mercury in CFL is not properly labelled. Maybe you know there is mercury vapour in it, but Joe Sixpack doesn't necessarily. Maybe Jim Hacker would like to salvage the electronic components for his indoor nuclear reactor prototype.


I#d thaught you live in France? Otherwise you would have noticed that the bulbs are signed "RoHS" (= according to 2002/96/EG).
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:28 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That's darwinism at it's finest, friend.

The mercury danger coming out of coal smokestacks isn't labeled either, but I haven't seen you complaining about that. Same for the uranium.

Cycloptichorn

You're just throwing out every pro-environmentalist pretext you can think of, aren't you.
Smokestacks have scruber and environmental standards and controllers and regular inspections. And its content is dilluted in cubic miles of air. Mercury vapour in CFL breaking in a room is for you and your family nose http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/airforceone.gif
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:30 pm
okie wrote:
Ethanol is turning out to be a boondoggle.

So what?
The whole human-caused-global-warming movement is turning out to be a boondoggle.

I've got it!
Let's all switch to candles for our lighting and buy carbon offsets. That at least might get us more trees planted to later burn down.
Razz
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:30 pm
miniTAX wrote:
Dimmers (variators if you like) DON'T work on CFL. Maybe you'll find a few but most don't, just look at the wrapping. Mine tells this: "ne pas utiliser avec variateurs de lumières, commutateurs électroniques, cellules photoélectriques, minuteries et détecteur".


All major and minor European brands - as well as nearly cheapest Chinese (though I wouldn't trust them) - produce energy saving bulbs which can be use with dimmers.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:31 pm
miniTAX wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That's darwinism at it's finest, friend.

The mercury danger coming out of coal smokestacks isn't labeled either, but I haven't seen you complaining about that. Same for the uranium.

Cycloptichorn

You're just throwing out every pro-environmentalist pretext you can think of, aren't you.
Smokestacks have scruber and environmental standards and controllers and regular inspections. And its content is dilluted in cubic miles of air. Mercury vapour in CFL breaking in a room is for you and your family nose http://forum-images.hardware.fr/images/perso/airforceone.gif


I don't know about your house but here in America we have 'windows' and many people even have 'central air conditioning.' It's not complicated to deal with this problem, not that there's any guarantee of the problem - as I said earlier the chances of breaking one are pretty slim overall.

Compare that to smokestacks - pumping out pollutants even AFTER the scrubbers do their job, every hour, every day, every year. Not even close, man.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:31 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I#d thaught you live in France? Otherwise you would have noticed that the bulbs are signed "RoHS" (= according to 2002/96/EG).
RoHS don't prevent the use of mercury vapor in the bulb Walter. CFLs can't do without it !
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:32 pm
I admit that I had no idea the CFLs we use contained mercury until today. I did know they required special handling in disposal. So far nobody has seemed to wish to deal with the hazardous waste problem should all or virtually all incandescent bulbs be replaced with CFLs though. As for harmful emissions via smokestacks, that is already pretty well illegal everywhere, especially if people live anywhere close.

And I still can't match colors competently using the fluorescent lights at Sears. Would this also have any ramifications in maybe some high tech or precision processes?
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:38 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
I don't know about your house but here in America we have 'windows' and many people even have 'central air conditioning.' It's not complicated to deal with this problem, not that there's any guarantee of the problem - as I said earlier the chances of breaking one are pretty slim overall.

Compare that to smokestacks - pumping out pollutants even AFTER the scrubbers do their job, every hour, every day, every year. Not even close, man.

Cycloptichorn
I'm not hysterical about mercury. The mercury madness is from the regulators. And the hypocrysie to condone the lack of proper labelling is from you.

Source (bolding mine):
Quote:

On March 13, Brandy Bridges was installing some of the two dozen CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) bulbs she had purchased in an attempt to save money on her energy bill.

One month later, though, Bridges is paying much more than she had ever expected to.

On that Tuesday, Bridges was installing one of the spiral-shaped light bulbs in her 7-year-old daughter's bedroom. Suddenly, the bulb plummeted to the floor, breaking on the shag carpet.

Bridges, who was wary of the dangers of cleaning up a fluorescent bulb, called The Home Depot where she purchased them. She was told that the bulbs had mercury in them and that she should not vacuum the area where the bulb had broken. Bridges was directed to call the Poison Control hotline.

Poison Control directed her to the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Environmental Protection.

Bridges still isn't convinced. She's worried about her daughter staying in the same house for the next 11 years, potentially having long-term exposure to mercury. She's worried about the rest of her family's health.

And she's worried about "the state downplaying the threat of mercury and not letting people know the dangers coming from one bulb" and "telling everybody to clean it up themselves."


"I think they are putting people's safety and health at risk because they know what the financial repercussions are going to be for the consumer," said Bridges.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:45 pm
So, one lady got worried and the Home Depot guy didn't know what he was talking about, big whoop. She didn't clean the bulb up and there was still some mercury there? Shocking! Maybe if she had swept the bulb up and opened up the windows, a lot of time and effort would have been saved.

The Maine DEP, from your own link:

Quote:


The DEP realized that the alarmism was worthless when they did a little math. It's not a conspiracy to sell lightbulbs.

Quote:


Cowger said it is important to ventilate the area by opening windows and not to vacuum the area of the broken bulb, which may spread the mercury. While wearing appropriate safety gloves, glasses, coveralls or old clothing and a dust mask, a person can remove the glass pieces and put them in a closed container.

The dust can be cleaned up using either two pieces of stiff paper, a disposal broom and dustpan or a commercial mercury spill kit. Afterward, the area should be patted with the sticky side of tape, according to the DEP Web site.

Cowger said all the items used in cleaning up the spill should be treated as "universal waste" or a household hazardous waste that can be disposed of without hiring professionals. He said that almost every town has a program for recycling or removing universal waste, which includes computers, electronic devices and fluorescent bulbs, at the transfer station.

"We encourage people not to panic if they break a lightbulb," said Cowger.

Cowger said the instructions on the Web site are the same for if a mercury thermometer breaks. If a person breaks anything bigger than a thermometer, for example a thermostat, Cowger recommends calling a professional to clean up the spill.

The DEP spokesman said, though, it "isn't necessary to hire professionals at all" for a light bulb. The specialist who responded to Bridges' broken bulb was trained to respond to chemical spills and to clean up such spills to "appropriate standards."


You're going to have to try a little harder then this, mkay? Nobody is really buying your alarmism outside the anti-global warming crowd.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:47 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
All major and minor European brands - as well as nearly cheapest Chinese (though I wouldn't trust them) - produce energy saving bulbs which can be use with dimmers.
Here in France, I have bought Philips and Osram CFLs. Both don't work with dimmers. And I have a presence detector in the cellar whose electronics is wreak havoc because of interference, I must switch back to a good old incadescent. No more incadescent and I must throw away the detector. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:53 pm
miniTAX wrote:
]Here in France, I have bought Philips and Osram CFLs.


Both do - even in France: Osram Dulux EL DIM and Philipps ... I can't remember the name.
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:53 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You're going to have to try a little harder then this, mkay? Nobody is really buying your alarmism outside the anti-global warming crowd.

Cycloptichorn
So you have nothing to say about the lack of mercury signaling on CFL? Well, well.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:55 pm
Philipps calls it MASTER PL Electronic
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:56 pm
miniTAX wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You're going to have to try a little harder then this, mkay? Nobody is really buying your alarmism outside the anti-global warming crowd.

Cycloptichorn
So you have nothing to say about the lack of mercury signaling on CFL? Well, well.


Nope. I don't consider it to be a major problem.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 03:58 pm
Philipps is (here) two years on the market, Osram about three years (considering when I bought them).
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 05:09 pm
At my campus, the disposal of CFLs (along with other things such as CRT monitors, etc) is managed by the university. Both are sent to be processed. It's a non-problem, because it is addressed proactively with a good local (in this case a campus) policy.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 05:11 pm
ican711nm wrote:
The whole human-caused-global-warming movement is turning out to be a boondoggle.


Unsupported argument... again.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Feb, 2008 05:44 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
The whole human-caused-global-warming movement is turning out to be a boondoggle.


Unsupported argument... again.

T
K
O
Unsupported argument ... again.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 04:44:10