On the lively topic of "political correctness"...the following seems to be a case of that term in violation:
Quote:Bill Bennett: "[Y]ou could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down"
Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far-reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crime ... if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down."
Go get them niggras, Bill. After aborting all the mistakenly-colored fetuses (good christian doctors won't want to do this, but jew doctors have their uses after all) you'll want to do some organized nut-cutting too so as to prevent more of the little blighters. Round 'em up in one location (a big football stadium, perhaps) and start snipping. Keep the gene-pool clean.
Of course, Bill ought to be allowed to say all this. And say it without fear that someone might come along, tie him down, and shove a military light-stick up his ass. Even my quoting him here is a case of political correctness and liberalism gone mad. Bork would agree. And nobody wants to hear that a light-stick has been shoved up Bork's ass, that's for sure. Well, I guess I do but am I allowed to say it under the present rules of propriety in speech. Would I, for example, violate the parameters if I were to advance the notion that "If you wanted to increase intelligence...if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every christian baby in this country, and your overall intelligence scores would zoom up like an evangelist's boner when he's beating a black whore senseless."
Can you fill me in on the rules of 'political correctness', george?