1
   

Are You Watching Any Of The Inauguration?

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 12:59 pm
I wonder how much money the Golden Globes award show cost?

Limosine rentals, clothing purchases, the awards themselves, set design, food and beverages, production costs, etc. I am sure it cost a few million to produce, yet Hollywood had no problem spending that money... I am sure the tsunami victims and the starving, homeless people in and around Hollywood would have made much better use of that money than the self-serving, self-congratulatory back slapping parade that happened.

Yet, I haven't heard a peep about it...

Odd that.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:00 pm
Maybe if it was paid for with taxpayer money you would hear a peep about it.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:04 pm
McGentrix wrote:
I wonder how much money the Golden Globes award show cost?

Limosine rentals, clothing purchases, the awards themselves, set design, food and beverages, production costs, etc. I am sure it cost a few million to produce, yet Hollywood had no problem spending that money... I am sure the tsunami victims and the starving, homeless people in and around Hollywood would have made much better use of that money than the self-serving, self-congratulatory back slapping parade that happened.

Yet, I haven't heard a peep about it...

Odd that.


financed 100% privately from the P&L ....and Hollywood doesn't stick their chests out at every opportunity to talk about being the conscience and caretaker of the world, receiving their messages directly from the almighty.....piss poor analogy, try again.....
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:08 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Maybe if it was paid for with taxpayer money you would hear a peep about it.
Maybe if Bush's inauguration celebration was paid for with taxpayer money you would have a point.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:08 pm
Some people--I name no names-- like to equate Hollywood's excesses with the Bush team's. Like there's some sort of moral equivalent between creating a sexy movie and murdering thousands of people.

Amazing...
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:09 pm
I wonder what the Democrats would have done if Kerry had won. I'll go on record to say it probably would have been about the same.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:11 pm
At least it would have been the inauguration of a new president. Quite apart from the politics here: Why the hell do we go through all this for someone who's already in office?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:13 pm
Look at the bright side D'art. Just think how much the union street sweepers are going to make in overtime pay.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:14 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
Maybe if it was paid for with taxpayer money you would hear a peep about it.
Maybe if Bush's inauguration celebration was paid for with taxpayer money you would have a point.


<nods>

I was gonna say that.

Razz
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:15 pm
Quote:
Maybe if Bush's inauguration celebration was paid for with taxpayer money you would have a point.


As Bush will not reimburse D.C. for their homeland security expenditures, and as Bush is cutting those funds to most major cities, it would seem that they'd need to make up the difference. Don't taxpayer dollars pay for firemen, police, etc.? And there'll be tons of overtime that'll need to be considered.

At least some of these Hollywood stars who attended the Golden Globes are making their own contributions to the Tsunami relief effort, as I have done already.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:15 pm
cjhsa wrote:
I wonder what the Democrats would have done if Kerry had won. I'll go on record to say it probably would have been about the same.


no rational person would deny that...it doesn't excuse it...and it's bush doing it so who else should we talking about? AND they're making DC pick up the security costs off the top of their homeland security budget...now THAT...in light of the fact that their entire campagin was based on bush being the one who was interested in protecting us makes it especially unpalatable IMO.

Look how big my dick is folks...that's it.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:18 pm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19193-2005Jan18.html

Quote:

Speaking at the winter meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, Williams (D) called on that organization, as well as other groups that represent local government, to protest the decision to force the city to use $11.9 million in homeland security funds to pay for police and other services on Inauguration Day. Traditionally, the federal government covers those costs.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:18 pm
Quote:
I wonder what the Democrats would have done if Kerry had won. I'll go on record to say it probably would have been about the same.


I doubt it. Kerry wasn't the one who started the war under false pretenses at the cost of over 1,300 U.S. troops and thousands of innocent Iraqis.

Bush would rather drink Champagne with his corporate donors then think about what's happening on the other side of the globe.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:21 pm
I part ways with you there Dookie...I think there'd have been a pretty jubilant celebration...perhaps not AS expensive, but certainly no miserly affair by any means....I think there'd have been a bigger citixzen turn out....
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:27 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
Maybe if Bush's inauguration celebration was paid for with taxpayer money you would have a point.


As Bush will not reimburse D.C. for their homeland security expenditures, and as Bush is cutting those funds to most major cities, it would seem that they'd need to make up the difference. Don't taxpayer dollars pay for firemen, police, etc.? And there'll be tons of overtime that'll need to be considered.

At least some of these Hollywood stars who attended the Golden Globes are making their own contributions to the Tsunami relief effort, as I have done already.
Absent your pointless submission is the realization that any large city would be happy to host such an event, because the increased commerce and notoriety more than makes up for the costs. Despite the expenses you note, it is a net gain. Idea

By the way... how many of you raised a similar stink at the $165,000,000 plus "security" associated with unveiling the world's largest doublewide?
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0411/gallery.library.opening/gal.3.1.jpg
Oh, yeah, that's right. None of you did. Because this is really nothing more than partisan politics as usual. Idea
0 Replies
 
Synonymph
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:31 pm
It's a wretched, disgusting waste of money. Sad. Despicable.

He justifies it by saying it's "important to celebrate a peaceful transfer of power."
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:38 pm
I love a parade.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:38 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Some people just need a warm schlitz and a marlboro to have fun, others need Dom and caviar...

ah yes. the people that do the working and dying get the low budget american beer and ciggies.

the people that benefit from the working and dying get the IMPORTED stuff.

dom from le socialiste france

beluga from the communist rus

gotta support those coalition partners, right ? Laughing




McGentrix wrote:
You have the fun you can afford.


and when somebody else is footin' the bill you can afford a lot, it would seem.

teachers? who needs 'em ?? just a bunch of free thinking liberals.

let the freaks 'n geeks starve on the street. i barely notice them when i step over them.

books are for the "universal remote" challenged. screw 'em !

college is for pinkos and livin' indoors is for wussies !


"party on, dick. party on, dubya. awhoo-oo whoo-oo whoo-oo".

Laughing
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:50 pm
BiPolar:

I by no means would cancel an inaugural event. But the guest list for Bush's party is riddled with his corporate donors looking for continued favors from this Administration.

OCCOM BILL:

Um, as the Administration, and Government, are firmly based in Washington D.C., I think it'd be a tad difficult to have this event anywhere other than in the Nation's capital. Plus business is gonna suck because many will boycott this entire event by NOT doing business that day, thereby negating that "net" gain. Or did you miss that one in the headlines?

By the way, Clinton isn't the one getting inagurated. Although it'd be a far cry from watching the idiot Bush taking the oath of office.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2005 01:54 pm
McGentrix wrote:
I wonder how much money the Golden Globes award show cost?

Limosine rentals, clothing purchases, the awards themselves, set design, food and beverages, production costs, etc. I am sure it cost a few million to produce, yet Hollywood had no problem spending that money... I am sure the tsunami victims and the starving, homeless people in and around Hollywood would have made much better use of that money than the self-serving, self-congratulatory back slapping parade that happened.

Yet, I haven't heard a peep about it...

Odd that.



the American Red Cross said it received a $1 million donation from Bullock for tsunami relief in South Asia and East Africa. The star of "Miss Congeniality" and "Speed" previously donated $1 million to the Red Cross in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks.

DiCaprio pledged a "sizable" contribution to UNICEF, the United Nations Children's Fund, targeted for aid to devastated areas of Thailand, where his 2000 film "The Beach," was filmed, said a spokesman for the actor.

Steven Spielberg is donating $1.5m to be split between charities Save the Children, Care, and Oxfam.

Chinese celebrities including Jackie Chan, Andy Lau, Jacky Cheung, and William Hung of American Idol infamy, raised nearly $6.2 million at a weekend show.

Linkin Park have teamed up with the American Red Cross to establish Music for Relief and have donated $100,000 to kickstart the effort.

Formula One world champion Michael Schumacher donated $10 million to help the victims -- a close friend and his two sons, aged four and five, were killed in Thailand.

Ozzie Osbourne - $190,000

George W Bush - $10,000
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 08:32:49