What is Evangelism?

The Universal Theory of Gravity is often taught in schools as a fact, when in fact it is not even a good theory.

First of all, no one has measured gravity for every atom and every star. It is simply a religious belief that it is "universal".

Secondly, school textbooks routinely make false statements. For example, "the moon goes around the earth." If the theory of gravity were true, it would show that the sun's gravitational force on the moon is much stronger than the earth's gravitational force on the moon, so the moon would go around the sun. Anybody can look up at night and see the obvious gaps in gravity theory.

The existence of tides is often taken as a proof of gravity, but this is logically flawed. Because if the moon's "gravity" were responsible for a bulge underneath it, then how can anyone explain a high tide on the opposite side of the earth at the same time? Anyone can observe that there are two — not one — high tides every day. It is far more likely that tides were given us by an Intelligent Creator long ago and they have been with us ever since. In any case, the fact that there are two high tides falsifies gravity.

There are numerous other flaws. For example, astronomers, who seem to have a fetish for gravity, tell us that the moon rotates on its axis but at the same time it always presents the same face to the earth. This is patently absurd. Moreover, if gravity were working on the early earth, then earth would have been bombarded out of existence by falling asteroids, meteors, comets, and other space junk. Furthermore, gravity theory suggests that the planets have been moving in orderly orbits for millions and millions of years, which wholly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Since everything in the Universe tends to disorder according to the Second Law, orderly orbits are impossible. This cannot be resolved by pointing to the huge outpouring of energy from the sun. In fact, it is known that the flux of photons from the sun and the "solar wind" actually tends to push earth away.

I took earth science, chemistry, biology, physics, and eventually botany up to college level.

Yeah, that's what I thought.

You're all into flattering the curve, as you put it, but you have no real answer for all the brutal authoritarianism going around. So you turn a blind eye to it, and accuse me.

Very well, I accuse you. I accuse you of being on the wrong side of history, on the side of people who cynically sold out to this crap. I accuse you of being part of the problem, of being so invested in being an enlightened world citizen, and not being racist/sexist/homophobic/xenophobic that when it came time to consider whether following orders was really about health and safety, you didn't even know enough history to understand that you're dealing with a Neo-Nazi movement. You just trusted the science.

Unlike the factory ruralism of communism, Nazis threw around the world science alot too. But their science was built around human experimentation. I also know what experiment this is. This has nothing to do with a disease, and everything to do with study of the effects of human social deprivation. It's Harry Harlow's experiments, only they didn't have the decency to stop at monkeys, but used humans. You haven't as much given any thought to how sick and abusive it is to continue to force a child to wear a mask and distance themselves from other people. Or the idea of giving a wild card vaccine that has caused blood clots to adults on growing children. Children who btw often haven't been informed that this disease (if it exists at all) seems to mostly affect the elderly, with practically nothing happening to children. That is, they are preying on the feelings of mothers to protect their children to instead institute population control, tricking them into maybe giving their child dangerous treatment. Even masks alone have an impact. My nephew and niece have a rash on their face from frequent mask wearing.

For me, if a theory cannot be transferable to any useful technology, it’s as good as theories of Unicorns and dragons. They are good only for movie scripts. That’s why sci-fi movies are full of these spacetime, black hole, worm hole, time travel concepts. Hardly you will see a movie which comprehend natural philosophy. It would be too boring, at-least for 21st century audiences.

Scientists of today think unnecessarily too deeply and not clearly. They are mostly mathematicians and rarely have any connection to nature. Ever since relativity is pushed as mainstream, no significant invention happened in the past hundred years. Science is hijacked into a religious cult with very little scope for critical thinking.

All our modern technologies use science before 1920. No technology uses anything related to relativity, quantum mechanics, string theory etc.

Hawking was pillar of corruption in science. Just like Einstein, he had no idea of the units and disciplines of measurement. Because they will never going to experiment anything as its useless for them. These people had no idea how to formulate a theory of measurement and the theory he developed takes no notice of the modern approach to measurement and worse, contradicts some of its fundamental principles.

As a fundamental requirement, a theory of measurement always assumes an absolute standard of measurement. The relativity theory begins with its first postulate by making the assumption that no such absolute conception exists. Therefore the theory is dead as a scientific theory of measurement, because no scientific theory at all can be built on the shifting sands of the assumption that any one and all inertial reference frames are equally valid as a frame within which the standards of measurement can be defined. Such a theory is obviously a contradiction, since no clear meaning can be assigned to any measurement, since all are relatively absolute to each other at the same time.

Hawking also lacks basic understanding of thermodynamics. He extended the absurd black concept and derived an equation for it’s temperature as:
T = ħc^3/8πGMk

Here,
T is temperature,
ħ is reduced Planck's constant,
G is constant of gravitation,
M is black hole mass, and
k is Boltzmann's constant.

Now ħ, G and k are universal constants so they have no thermodynamic character.

The numbers 8 and π are pure numbers so they too have no thermodynamic character.

Temperature T and mass M have thermodynamic character. Temperature is always intensive, according to the 0th and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Mass is not intensive, mass is extensive.

In any thermodynamic equation the units must be the same on both sides (dimensional analysis) and the thermodynamic character must also balance.

Hawking's equation equates temperature, which is always intensive, to a combination of terms which is not intensive. His equation is therefore in violation of the laws of thermodynamics. So it’s false.

That's your problem.

You think intelligence is the prime indicator of a human being.

Which is more important?

The rest of your rant is just bullshit, so I will not bother with it.

1Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, the hometown of Lazarus, whom He had raised from the dead. 2So they hosted a dinner for Jesus there. Martha served, and Lazarus was among those reclining at the table with Him. 3Then Mary took about a pint of expensive perfume, made of pure nard, and she anointed Jesus’ feet and wiped them with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume.

4But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, who was going to betray Him, asked, 5“Why wasn’t this perfume sold for three hundred denarii and the money given to the poor?” 6Judas did not say this because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief. As keeper of the money bag, he used to take from what was put into it.

Quote:

The rest of your rant is just bullshit, so I will not bother with it.

Try.

Let's start by trying with Hawking's bullshit math.

And then let's try with the fact that Hawking never did anything substantial for his fellow men, while Jane Wilde cites her conversion to Christianity as what gave her strength to put up with this man and care for him for the better part of 30 years.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Hawking
And how the people around this man (including the man who designed his chair) were decent and loving and kind, and how this man's atheism was a reflection on his absolute **** personality, and inability to give credit to those around him. When he got inducted into the Royal Society, not a word about his wife. Who gave up her dreams to play glorified nursemaid. A women with a PhD in Irish poetry, and she's driving Mr Daisy.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-the-theory-of-everything-doesn-t-tell-you-about-stephen-hawking
You talk a good game about those things, but I suspect your definition of them is social justice. That is, "kindness that I hope benefits me."

Quote:

1Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, the hometown of Lazarus, whom He had raised from the dead. 2So they hosted a dinner for Jesus there. Martha served, and Lazarus was among those reclining at the table with Him. 3Then Mary took about a pint of expensive perfume, made of pure nard, and she anointed Jesus’ feet and wiped them with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume.

4But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, who was going to betray Him, asked, 5“Why wasn’t this perfume sold for three hundred denarii and the money given to the poor?” 6Judas did not say this because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief. As keeper of the money bag, he used to take from what was put into it.

Now try to imagine people who invent practical things instead of sitting around in a chair making arcane math assumptions. You are sitting here typing this because of the inventors of network technology and computers. I have no use for theoretical math, I only care about math used to give life to technology. If you cannot use it in the physical world, it doesn't exist.

This man did nothing but sit on a throne (literally) and hand down assumptions. Without the novelty of him being on a device, nothing about this man was impressive. If we want to talk about crackpot quantum theories, I could easily tell you that that black holes are really portals to parallel dimensions or that time is really an inverted funnel. And here, here's some nonsense math.
∞/0 = √-Ω
I'll pretend I know what the hell I am talking about, and proceed to acquire an entourage of people to tell me how brilliant I am. Or maybe, you can admit bad math, and that real science is based on results, not peer review.

Then tell me one modern device that uses quantum theory. Just one.

Mmmm hmmmm.

So you cannot name one.

Yes, you are full of bullshit, indeed.