1
   

Bush's Education Dept. paid commentator to promote law

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 10:14 am
Full article from PR Week by Ray Kotcher, CEO of Ketchum
: OP-ED: Williams scandal is a'transformational event' in PR

Federal Communications Commission's statement
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jan, 2005 05:49 pm
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1126875#1126875

related topic, please stop by......
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Jan, 2005 09:46 am
Another 'accountability moment' passes into the ether...

Quote:
President Bush this week said that radio commentator Armstrong Williams was right to fault himself for taking $240,000 to promote No Child Left Behind, the centerpiece of Bush's education policy.

But Bush found no fault with his Education Department, which suggested the arrangement and paid Williams the money.


Bush says Williams wrong to take the money

Nobody makes -- or admits to making -- any mistakes. No dissent. No contrary views. You're either with us or against us.

Stay on message. Stick to the talking points. if you encounter resistance or disagreement, shout it down. Cower them into submission. Remember, our enemies in the homeland are too scared to fight back effectively.

Remind them also that they must conform, that they must be more like us in order to be 'rehabilitated'.

Where no controversy exists, create one: Secularists are attacking the phrase "Merry Christmas". To arms! Social Security is going bankrupt! We must "privatize" it by giving it to Merrill Lynch!

And the band played on.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Jan, 2005 09:51 am
Shall we dance, PDid? Might as well.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Jan, 2005 10:00 am
As hot as you look in those garters, babe, I'm afraid I'm just not in the mood.

Sorry.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Jan, 2005 12:01 pm
headache?
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Jan, 2005 12:18 pm
Gonna be a long four years for some folks around here Smile
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 01:01 pm
And the next paid propagandist floats up...
Quote:
In 2002, syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher repeatedly defended President Bush's push for a $300 million initiative encouraging marriage as a way of strengthening families.

"The Bush marriage initiative would emphasize the importance of marriage to poor couples" and "educate teens on the value of delaying childbearing until marriage," she wrote in National Review Online, for example, adding that this could "carry big payoffs down the road for taxpayers and children."

But Gallagher failed to mention that she had a $21,500 contract with the Department of Health and Human Services to help promote the president's proposal. Her work under the contract, which ran from January through October 2002, included drafting a magazine article for the HHS official overseeing the initiative, writing brochures for the program and conducting a briefing for department officials.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36545-2005Jan25.html
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 01:43 pm
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries Wednesday not to pay media commentators to promote his legislative agenda, saying payments by the Education Department were improper and new leadership was now in place.

In his most direct criticism to date, Bush leveled blame at officials at the Education Department for paying conservative commentator Armstrong Williams $240,000 to tout his landmark education plan, "No Child Left Behind."

Bush said it was an improper use of government funds, and told a news conference: "I expect my Cabinet secretaries to make sure that that practice doesn't go forward. There needs to be independence."

Federal communications regulators earlier this month opened an investigation into whether Williams violated a ban on "payola" in promoting the education law.

Bush said, "We didn't know about this in the White House."

Asked what will happen to officials at the Education Department who made the decision to pay Williams, Bush said: "We've got new leadership going to the Department of Education."

White House domestic policy adviser Margaret Spellings is replacing Rod Paige as education secretary.

"But all our Cabinet secretaries must realize that we will not be paying, you know, commentators to advance our agenda. Our agenda ought to be able to stand on its own two feet," Bush said.

Williams has acknowledged that the Education Department's outside media firm paid $240,000 to a public relations company he owns to promote Bush's education act during a television show he owned and hosted.

U.S. law requires that radio or television stations, as well as individuals, disclose on air when they have received compensation to talk about a product or issue.

After the Education Department compensation became public, Williams admitted "poor judgment."

He said he had been a strong backer of the law and that he was not influenced by outside parties. Tribune Co.'s syndication unit, Tribune Media, has canceled his column.

SOurce
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 01:46 pm
Well, good. That needed to be said.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 01:49 pm
and now for the latest news on who outed Valerie Plame--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(never mind, he was re-elected)
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 03:00 pm
Quote:
In his most direct criticism to date, Bush leveled blame at officials at the Education Department for paying conservative commentator Armstrong Williams $240,000 to tout his landmark education plan, "No Child Left Behind."


Well at least Bush is good at something. He levels blame as well as any narcissist I've ever known. 10 points for the apparently perfect little man.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Jan, 2005 04:21 pm
If only Bush were not completely full of shite, perhaps we could actually believe that he meant what he said.

It is said that an American Indian tribe, graced with the presence of a Bush visit for American Indian rights, bestowed the monicker of "Walking Eagle" to the fake leader of the free world.

Accepting this honorable title, Bush gratefully thanked the tribe, and departed. When journalists asked later what Walking Eagle meant, the Chief replied that it referred to a bird that was so full of shite that it couldn't fly.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jan, 2005 09:49 am
LOL..........how appropriate.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jan, 2005 10:04 am
Actually, here's how that joke really goes ...

"During a campaign tour of the Apache Nation Wednesday, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said he had a plan to increase every Native American's income by $40,000 a year. Senator Kerry refused repeated requests for details of his plan. However, he also told the Apaches that during his Senate career, he has voted Yes 9,637 times ... for every Indian issue ever introduced.

Just before his departure, the Apache Tribe presented the Presidential candidate a beautiful brass plaque inscribed with his honorary Indian name, Walking Eagle.

After Mr. Kerry left, tribal officials explained to the Press that Walking Eagle is a bird so full of sh*t, it can no longer fly."



But hey, that reminds me .... had you heard that when he was in office, Clinton tried to declare a new National Bird?

Yeah ... "The Spread Eagle."



I'm here all week. Tip your waitressess. Try the veal.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jan, 2005 10:06 am
Ba-dump-ump.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 05:46 am
Paid propagandist number three....the title of his sydicated column? "Ethics and Religion"

Quote:
On Thursday, a third example surfaced. Mike McManus, who writes a weekly column syndicated in 30 to 40 newspapers, said he was paid about $4,000 to train marriage mentors in 2003 and 2004. McManus was subcontracted by the Lewin Group, which had a contract to support community-based programs "to form and sustain healthy marriages."

McManus' non-profit group, Marriage Savers, also is being paid $49,000 by a group that received a Health and Human Services grant to teach similar principles to unwed couples who are having children.

Since the consulting deals began in January 2003, McManus has touted Bush's marriage initiative in several of his columns. At least three of them quoted Horn, a former member of the Marriage Savers board of directors. Horn's office manages the grant and contract under which McManus' group is paid.

McManus, who has been quoted as a marriage expert in publications

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-27-hhs_x.htm
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 08:29 am
The paid propagandist is an interesting, but not surprising story. It's obviously a trend. Big surprise, Bush and his men are cheaters. I'm sure we'll be seeing more of it.

But let's not miss this opportunity to observe their technique. Everyone close your eyes and imagine........here's a clean cut marriage "expert" teaching a room full of unwed parents-to-be about how to form and sustain a healthy marriage? Hilarious. Whatayawannabet it works?

It reminds me of this passage from Huckleberry Finn in which Huck's ole Pap gets some learnin from the new judge:

Quote:
When he got out the new judge said he was agoing to make a man of him. So he took him to his own house, and dressed him up clean and nice, and had him to breakfast and dinner and supper with the family, and was just old pie to him, so to speak. And after supper he talked to him about temperance and such things till the old man cried, and said he'd been a fool, and fooled away his life; but now he was agoing to turn over a new leaf and be a man nobody wouldn't be ashamed of, and he hoped the judge would help him and not look down on him. The judge said he could hug him for them words; and he cried, and his wife, she cried again; pap said he'd been a man that had always been misunderstood before, and the judge said he believed it. The old man said that what a man wanted that was down was sympathy; and the judge said it was so; so they cried again. And when it was bedtime, the old man rose up and held out his hand, and says:

'Look at it gentlemen and ladies all; take ahold of it; shake it. There's a hand that was the hand of a hog; but it ain't so no more; it's the hand of a man that's started in on a new life, and 'll die before he'll go back. You mark them words -- don't forget I said them. It's a clean hand now; shake it -- don't be afeard."

So they shook it, one after the other, all around, and cried. The judge's wife she kissed it. Then the old man he signed a pledge -- made his mark. The judge said it was the holiest time on record, or something like that. Then they tucked the old man into a beautiful room, which was the spare room, and in the night sometime he got powerful thirsty and clumb out onto the porch-roof and slid down a stanchion and traded his new coat for a jug of forty-rod, and clumb back again and had a good old time; and towards daylight he crawled out again, drunk as a fiddler, and rolled off the porch and broke his left arm in two places and was most froze to death when somebody found him after sun-up. And when they come to look at that spare room, they had to take soundings before they could navigate it.
Huckleberry Finn, p. 23 (end of Chapter V)

This is how taxpayer's money is being wasted.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 03:52 pm
This whole racket seems designed to support third-rate conservative pundits. Who the hell are these guys?

Other than "marriage experts", I mean....
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jan, 2005 03:56 pm
PDiddie wrote:
This whole racket seems designed to support third-rate conservative pundits. Who the hell are these guys?

Other than "marriage experts", I mean....


They are just that ... experts hired to do what they are expert at. As it is, they also write a column. I'm speaking specifically about these last 2, both of whom were hired for their knowledge in their field of expertise. Should the government be precluded from hiring an expert if that person happens to write a column? What these 2 should have done was disclose the fact of payment to their readers. That's just the right thing to do.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 12:26:12