Reply
Tue 4 Jan, 2005 09:26 am
Source -
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashai.htm
It hasn't been reported on many other news sites yet, so who knows. But if it's true it's a bit of good news before the Iraqi elections.
Washington Times specualting on same story - says there are reports of the capture of an important terrorist in a semi-official daily.
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050104-095924-4037r.htm
And China Daily appears more confident:
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi reportedly arrested in Iraq
(itar-tass.com)
Updated: 2005-01-04 14:37
Abu Mus'ab al-Zarqawi, whom the US occupation authorities declared to be the "target number one" in Iraq, has been arrested in the city of Baakuba, the Emirate newspaper al-Bayane reported on Tuesday referring to Kurdish sources.
Al-Zarqawi, leader of the terrorist group Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad, was recently appointed the director of the Al-Qaeda organisation in Iraq.
The newspaper's correspondent in Baghdad points out that a report on the seizure of the terrorist, on whom the US put a bounty of US$10 million, was also reported by Iraqi Kurdistan radio, which at one time had been the first to announce the arrest of Saddam Hussein.
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was captured in Iraq, said Tuesday's Al Bayan, a daily newspaper of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).[file]
There have been no official reports about the arrest of the terrorist. Al-Zarqawi, 38, a Jordanian, whose real name is Ahmad al-Khalayleh, aims to turn Iraq into a "new Afghanistan".
According to Arab press data, Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad group has divided Iraq into several emirates. The group's independent subdivisions at a strength of 50 to 500 militants operate in the cities of Al-Falluja, Al-Qaim, Diala, and Samarra.
The personnel of the group is on the whole 1,500-strong and includes Iraqis and citizens of Arab and Islamic countries. There are demolition experts and missilemen among them.
The group has depots of weapons and explosives in various parts of the country. It intends to frustrate the upcoming parliamentary elections that are scheduled for the end of this month. Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad threatens to do away with Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and members of the interim government.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-01/04/content_405831.htm
If it's true, I don't see it necessarily having a positive effect ob the upcoming Iraqui elections. It could make his followers more enraged and thus keen to disrupt the elections even more than they've been doing.
Re: al-Zarqawi reportedly arrested in Iraq
Welcome to A2K, netfool.
Drudge just makes **** up a lot of the time:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drudge_Report#Errors_at_the_Report
Quote:Errors at the Report
Matt Drudge has been variously (mis)quoted as saying the Report is 80 percent accurate. The attribution stems from Drudge's most famous incident of erroneous reporting, which occurred on August 10, 1997 when Drudge published a report saying that incoming White House assistant Sidney Blumenthal beat his wife and was covering it up. Drudge retracted the story the next day, saying he was given bad information, but Blumenthal filed a $30 million libel lawsuit against Drudge. (
http://www.epic.org/free_speech/blumenthal_v_drudge.html ) Drudge told Salon magazine that "I seemed to have about 80 percent of the facts" about the Blumenthal report. (
http://archive.salon.com/aug97/news/news2970815.html ) This quote has since been applied, fairly or not, to all of Drudge's work. The libel suit was settled in 2001 when Blumenthal agreed to drop the charges if Drudge did not file counter-charges. The case lasted for so long because the burden of proof was on Blumenthal to show that Drudge had had actual malice in printing the false report. (
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A30046-2001May1 ) Drudge's legal defence was largely funded by the libertarian centre for the Study of Popular Culture.
The "80 percent" meme has been fueled by further articles and rumors in the Report occasionally revealed to be completely wrong or unsubstantiated. The Report was the source of a sensational rumor (a "World Exclusive") in February 2004, about presidential candidate John Kerry, alleging that he had an affair with a young intern named Alexandra Polier. (
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2004/02/12/20040212_233205_mattjk1.htm ) The woman, who in fact was never an intern for Kerry, denied the claim, and the rumor has now been thoroughly repudiated. The story was never carried by any mainstream media, and Drudge has not meaningfully addressed it since its publication, although the story remained available on his website (though de-linked) up to a year after its publication.
A later erroneous report emerged in the 2004 campaign, one week before Senator Kerry announced his selection of Senator John Edwards as his vice presidential running mate. The Report headlined a prediction from a "top D.C. insider" saying that Senator Kerry would be announcing Senator Hillary Clinton as his running mate, declaring it to mark the beginning of a "massive love fest."(
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2004/07/01/20040701_012802_kerryhrc.htm ) The story was de-linked one day later. After Edward's selection, Drudge removed all "VP Hillary" coverage without comment; the correction or outright removal of false content published at the Report is usually handled in similar no-comment fashion.
Despite instances of unreliability, the Drudge Report profits from the nature of its electronic medium. Because the Drudge Report is not part of the mainstream media and is published electronically, and not in print, such inaccuracies and errors are often forgotten. Archives of older reports are generally not easy to find, and Drudge does not systematically archive any of his reports. A number of reports from 1995 to early 1997 are available in the Usenet archive provided by Google Groups. A more extensive archive of the website is provided by a third party (the Drudge Report Archives), which has taken snapshots every two minutes since mid-November 2001.
Actually - Drudge did not actually make it up - they may have beaten it up.
I was investigating it yesterday,and it seems all the places that DID report it were going on a report from a Kurdish source that had, it was said, been accurate about Hussien's capture.
It is interesting that no reputable western news outlets went with it - even the Washington Times was clear that it was speculation.
Aljazeera did not go with it - but their shadow, Al Jazeera com did.
Drudge and Washington Times reporting the same story--that's like finding matching shoes on your feet. That's they way it's supposed to work.
Is Fox News also on this story?
Didn't show up as running it on Google.