Evolutionry/religious nonsense

The topic is evolution (and religious nonsense). Abiogenesis, dark matter and your other diversionary tactics are irrelevant, because evolution can only take place once life is present. How it arises is not relevant to a discussion of evolution. The entirely hypothetical issue of "dark matter" and the heat death of the cosmos is not relevant. I'm not avoiding any of your silly attempts at diversionary arguments, because they are not relevant.

Evolutionary history of life
PongolaHuronianCryogenianAndeanKarooQuaternaryice agesAxis scale: million years
Also see: Human timeline and Nature timeline
Main article: Evolutionary history of life
See also: Timeline of evolutionary history of life
Origin of life
Further information: Abiogenesis, Earliest known life forms, Panspermia, and RNA world hypothesis
The Earth is about 4.54 billion years old.[280][281][282] The earliest undisputed evidence of life on Earth dates from at least 3.5 billion years ago,[19][283] during the Eoarchean Era after a geological crust started to solidify following the earlier molten Hadean Eon. Microbial mat fossils have been found in 3.48 billion-year-old sandstone in Western Australia.[6][7][8] Other early physical evidence of a biogenic substance is graphite in 3.7 billion-year-old metasedimentary rocks discovered in Western Greenland[5] as well as "remains of biotic life" found in 4.1 billion-year-old rocks in Western Australia.[22][23] According to one of the researchers, "If life arose relatively quickly on Earth … then it could be common in the universe."[22]

More than 99 percent of all species, amounting to over five billion species,[284] that ever lived on Earth are estimated to be extinct.[25][26] Estimates on the number of Earth's current species range from 10 million to 14 million,[27][28] of which about 1.9 million are estimated to have been named[29] and 1.6 million documented in a central database to date,[30] leaving at least 80 percent not yet described.

Highly energetic chemistry is thought to have produced a self-replicating molecule around 4 billion years ago, and half a billion years later the last common ancestor of all life existed.[17] The current scientific consensus is that the complex biochemistry that makes up life came from simpler chemical reactions.[285] The beginning of life may have included self-replicating molecules such as RNA[286] and the assembly of simple cells.[287]

Whenever you provide some irrefutable evidence for your magic sky daddy, for any kind of design, for any kind of intelligence behind said putative design, we'll have something to discuss. Until then, you're just whistling past the graveyard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis Also: http://www.ecology.com/2011/09/10/earths-beginnings-origins-life/

Current models
There is no single, generally accepted model for the origin of life. Scientists have proposed several plausible hypotheses, which share some common elements. While differing in the details, these hypotheses are based on the framework laid out by Alexander Oparin (in 1924) and by J. B. S. Haldane (in 1925), who postulated the molecular or chemical evolution theory of life.[105] According to them, the first molecules constituting the earliest cells "were synthesized under natural conditions by a slow process of molecular evolution, and these molecules then organized into the first molecular system with properties with biological order".[105] Oparin and Haldane suggested that the atmosphere of the early Earth may have been chemically reducing in nature, composed primarily of methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), water (H2O), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide (CO2) or carbon monoxide (CO), and phosphate (PO43−), with molecular oxygen (O2) and ozone (O3) either rare or absent. According to later models, the atmosphere in the late Hadean period consisted largely of nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide, with smaller amounts of carbon monoxide, hydrogen (H2), and sulfur compounds;[106] while it did lack molecular oxygen and ozone,[107] it was not as chemically reducing as Oparin and Haldane supposed. In the atmosphere proposed by Oparin and Haldane, electrical activity can produce certain small molecules (monomers) of life, such as amino acids. The Miller–Urey experiment reported in 1953 demonstrated this.

Bernal coined the term biopoiesis in 1949 to refer to the origin of life.[108] In 1967, he suggested that it occurred in three "stages":

the origin of biological monomers
the origin of biological polymers
the evolution from molecules to cells
Bernal suggested that evolution commenced between stages 1 and 2. Bernal regarded the third stage – discovering methods by which biological reactions were incorporated behind a cell's boundary – as the most difficult. Modern work on the way that cell membranes self-assemble, and the work on micropores in various substrates may be a halfway house towards the development of independent free-living cells.[109][110][111]

The chemical processes that took place on the early Earth are called chemical evolution. Since the end of the nineteenth century, 'evolutive abiogenesis' means increasing complexity and evolution of matter from inert to living state.[112] Both Manfred Eigen and Sol Spiegelman demonstrated that evolution, including replication, variation, and natural selection, can occur in populations of molecules as well as in organisms.[51] Spiegelman took advantage of natural selection to synthesize the Spiegelman Monster, which had a genome with just 218 nucleotide bases, having deconstructively evolved from a 4500-base bacterial RNA. Eigen built on Spiegelman's work and produced a similar system further degraded to just 48 or 54 nucleotides – the minimum required for the binding of the replication enzyme.[113]

Following on from chemical evolution came the initiation of biological evolution, which led to the first cells.[51] No one has yet synthesized a "protocell" using simple components with the necessary properties of life (the so-called "bottom-up-approach"). Without such a proof-of-principle, explanations have tended to focus on chemosynthesis.[114] However, some researchers work in this field, notably Steen Rasmussen and Jack W. Szostak. Others have argued that a "top-down approach" is more feasible. One such approach, successfully attempted by Craig Venter and others at J. Craig Venter Institute, involves engineering existing prokaryotic cells with progressively fewer genes, attempting to discern at which point the most minimal requirements for life are reached.[115][116][117]

The NASA strategy on abiogenesis states that it is necessary to identify interactions, intermediary structures and functions, energy sources, and environmental factors that contributed to the diversity, selection, and replication of evolvable macromolecular systems.[118] Emphasis must continue to map the chemical landscape of potential primordial informational polymers. The advent of polymers that could replicate, store genetic information, and exhibit properties subject to selection likely was a critical step in the emergence of prebiotic chemical evolution.[118]

Science is very simple. It looks into the cause and effect of our environment, finds irrefutable evidence for it, then writes up a theory on what was found.

If you want to find evidence of intelligent design you half to look for evidence of a designer that fits the characteristics Of someone who could create matter from nothing and, who can turn that matter into living matter.