Evolutionry/religious nonsense

[at]tack of what?? same old **** that makes an argument out of a negative assertion. Wheres there any evidence at all??

I think youve not been looking very hard . The crap that Discovery prints and posts is evidence-free tripe. Youve already forgotten about Irreducible complexity or specified information?
WEDGIE DOCUMENT

The surrounds of Stonehenge contained villages and palisades similar to others of late neolithic and bronze nd iron ages. Technology cpmparisons make an argument that whoever lived an worked at Stonehenge were similar to other humans in the various "Doggerland" and more likely , pre-keltic cultures(I believe the term has been the Windmill Hill people). I beleieve they also have DNA amd mDNA from the residents of the burial spots and these are similar to nativist haplogroups seen in the population of todays areas in UK and Wales.

Absent any evidence of the intervention of aliens from space, the only conclusions about Stonehenge are that it was built by humans, or by other animals. Leaning only very lightly on Occam's Razor, scientists choose to believe that it was built by humans. Anyone claiming otherwise is making an extraordinary claim, and therefore will have to provide extraordinary evidence. Of course, as is always the case with the god-botherers, their claims are wonderfully evidence-free.

I think I've presented a reasonable argument that evolution by natural selection is an algorithm operating in hardware through an operating system.

The pattern follows today that all operating algorithms are created and operated according to rules and hardware built by intelligent beings.

As SET stated quite clearly, Its not up to me to show why I DONT believe as you, its your job to convincingly make your case. Thats the way it works.
SO, from hereon, any strong cases made for ancient aliens giving humans a kick start is up to you not me

If, the entire universe is the hardware and the laws of physics are the operating system that the algorithm of natural selection is running in, then the creator of that system must be similar to intelligent beings we are observing creating algorithms today, just a lot larger in ability and scope.

Since we are living inside the system and are part of it, and the size and scope of the system is far above our abilities, it seems reasonable that we might have a hard time relating to the designer of the system.

Occam's razor leads to simplicity. If there was only God and His ideas before the universe came into being you can't get any simpler than that. Stonehenge is the evidence for human creating. The universe and us are evidence for something bigger than humans creating.

Bullsh*t--all you've done is offer such an overlay on the actual data available, and not even a plausible argument

Nonsense--you've come up with a feeble analogy, which doesn't work, and now you're trying to suggest that your case is proven, and in the final analysis, to lay the ground work for a claim of an "intelligence" which has "guided" evolution. In short, you want to introduce your imaginary friend superstition

This is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to support your IDiotic thesis about the origin of species, and yet another example of the lengths that the god-botherers will go to in their deceitful attempt to establish theistic creation.

Come back with a knock-down argument, and evidence for your imaginary friend, and you might have a case. As long as you attempt to deceitfully propose an intelligence, which you won't admit is your imaginary friend, and come up with hilariously idiotic propositions such as this drivel you've been posting about Stonehenge, you just continue to make a fool of yourself, and to lie about your true underlying motive.

Most adults—not quite six in 10—believe Jesus was God (56%), while about one-quarter say he was only a religious or spiritual leader like Mohammed or the Buddha (26%). The remaining one in six say they aren’t sure whether Jesus was divine (18%).

Millennials are the only generation among whom fewer than half believe Jesus was God (48%). About one-third of young adults (35%) say instead that Jesus was merely a religious or spiritual leader, while 17 percent aren’t sure what he was.

In each older generation, the belief in Jesus as divine is more common—55 percent of Gen-Xers, 58 percent of Boomers and nearly two-thirds of Elders (62%) believe Jesus was God.

The evidence says he fits the bill and over half the American population agrees.

The only designer is evolution. 🤓
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution