0
   

Hollywood's Clinton/Genocide Flick

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 01:55 pm
I didn't realize you valued American lives over everyone else either.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 01:55 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
these US citizen were DIRECTLY blown to f*#king kingdom come today. More will DIRECTLY be killed before Christmas.

Now, please give me a number on how many US citizens must be killed, at home or abroad before it constitutes a direct threat and I will get back to you when we reach that number. Had we not invaded Iraq....it can be argued that more US citizens COULD have died in another terrorist attack. That those who have died so far have died BECAUSE we invaded Iraq is irrefutable.


The IRAQI GOVT is NOT killing US citizens within our boarders or within the boarders of Iraq.

You must be confused if you believe the war in Iraq is a direct part on the war on terrorism. PART of the reason we resumed hositilites with IRAQ was their potential to expand the war on terrorism by providing monetary and or munition support to terrorists.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:01 pm
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
these US citizen were DIRECTLY blown to f*#king kingdom come today. More will DIRECTLY be killed before Christmas.

Now, please give me a number on how many US citizens must be killed, at home or abroad before it constitutes a direct threat and I will get back to you when we reach that number. Had we not invaded Iraq....it can be argued that more US citizens COULD have died in another terrorist attack. That those who have died so far have died BECAUSE we invaded Iraq is irrefutable.


The IRAQI GOVT is NOT killing US citizens within our boarders or within the boarders of Iraq.

You must be confused if you believe the war in Iraq is a direct part on the war on terrorism. PART of the reason we resumed hositilites with IRAQ was their potential to expand the war on terrorism by providing monetary and or munition support to terrorists.


I forgot to add the link on this post

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/12/21/iraq.main/index.html

Now surely you'll agree that members of our miltary are us citizens....

Are you finally admitting that the War in Iraq has nothing to do with the war on terrorism? Because that means we have sure enough been lied to this whole time....and if you plan to come back and split hairs over the word direct...let me just say this is the biggest indirect messe since Viet Nam.....
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:02 pm
McGentrix wrote:
I didn't realize you valued American lives over everyone else either.


you're not capable of baiting me good buddy...but nice try...
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:04 pm
Baiting you? No, just trying to understand why you believe that American lives are more important than Iraqi, Israeli, Arab lives.

That seems to go against other things you have said.

If I was baiting you, I'd use a seal, a stick and some rope.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:08 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Baiting you? No, just trying to understand why you believe that American lives are more important than Iraqi, Israeli, Arab lives.

That seems to go against other things you have said.

If I was baiting you, I'd use a seal, a stick and some rope.


like I said...nice try...
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:20 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
these US citizen were DIRECTLY blown to f*#king kingdom come today. More will DIRECTLY be killed before Christmas.

Now, please give me a number on how many US citizens must be killed, at home or abroad before it constitutes a direct threat and I will get back to you when we reach that number. Had we not invaded Iraq....it can be argued that more US citizens COULD have died in another terrorist attack. That those who have died so far have died BECAUSE we invaded Iraq is irrefutable.


The IRAQI GOVT is NOT killing US citizens within our boarders or within the boarders of Iraq.

You must be confused if you believe the war in Iraq is a direct part on the war on terrorism. PART of the reason we resumed hositilites with IRAQ was their potential to expand the war on terrorism by providing monetary and or munition support to terrorists.


I forgot to add the link on this post

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/12/21/iraq.main/index.html

Now surely you'll agree that members of our miltary are us citizens....

Are you finally admitting that the War in Iraq has nothing to do with the war on terrorism? Because that means we have sure enough been lied to this whole time....and if you plan to come back and split hairs over the word direct...let me just say this is the biggest indirect messe since Viet Nam.....


I alredy answered that in the post you quoted Rolling Eyes

I do not feel I have been lied to because I listen very carefully to the words and actions of our Govt. You seem to pick and choose what you want to hear and see.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Dec, 2004 02:23 pm
I could say the same about you...but I didn't......becuase I'm sure you do listen carefully ....as do I.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 11:20:14