Reply
Mon 20 Dec, 2004 08:38 pm
The Social Security Administration (news - web sites) is rejecting marriage documents issued for heterosexual couples in four communities that performed weddings for gay couples earlier this year.
The agency is rejecting all marriage certificates issued in New Paltz, N.Y., after Feb. 27, when the town's mayor began marrying gay couples, according to town officials.
Certificates issued during the brief periods when Asbury Park, N.J., Multnomah County, Ore., and Sandoval County, N.M., recognized gay marriages are also being rejected.
Susie Kilpatrick, 30, of New Paltz, said the local Social Security (news - web sites) office told her that no marriage documents issued after Feb. 27 could be used to establish identity because of the gay marriages that took place there earlier this year. About 125 heterosexual couples have been married since then.
Kilpatrick said her marriage certificate was rejected when she went to get a new card earlier this month so she could take her husband's name.
"What concerns me is that the certificate is the only way to prove that we're married," she told The New York Times for Sunday editions. "If something happens to us, or some other couple from New Paltz, we can't prove we're married. We would not be able to draw benefits."
Yup.
re: your sig
Are you sure you're not an UNusual suspect?
dys- Do you have a link to that article? It is very bizarre. Are you talking about the marriage license, or the certificate given the couple by the clergyperson or judge?
I wonder if these marriages are legal? If not, what is the rationale for making them illegal? What effect would the the social security ruling have if the couple divorced, in terms of child custody, alimony, child support? What about the other benefits given married couples?