1
   

which is important?

 
 
Reply Sun 19 Dec, 2004 06:59 am
somebody says Grammar holds an important role in English, But some others say that Vocabulary does.
what is the fact?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 790 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Dec, 2004 07:40 am
Neither of these points of view excludes the other.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Dec, 2004 07:46 am
English has one of the largest vocabularies of any language on earth -- close to one million words in an unabridged dictionary. However, most people who are fluent in the language are familiar with only a small fraction of this huge collection -- a few thousand at most. But what good is knowing the words if one doesn't know how to properly string them together in a sentence? Noddy24 is absolutely correct -- the two things are not mutually exclusive.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Dec, 2004 09:20 am
Language is an Art of communication... in which combinations of sounds (words) are arranged in such a manner as to convey meaning.
Simple elementary communication requires less vocabulary and grammatical expertise than the realm of subtlety and nuance.

Some people are forced, through inability to hear or speak, to communicate via hand signs... experience, skill and creativity all make a profound difference in the level of communication attainable.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Dec, 2004 10:51 pm
The richness of the English vocabulary necessitates a fairly rigorous, tightly structured grammar. Note I did not say "Well Structured", or even "Logical" grammar - English grammar has almost as many twists, exclusions, exceptions, and loopholes as do the millions upon untold millions of pages of laws that are written in the language. But it does have an established - if somewhat arcane - structure.

It is through deft execution of that structure, in conjunction with the astounding vocabulary available, with which, at the author or narator's choice, may be achieved absolute precision, maddeningly vague nuance, delightful whimsy, the sternest of pedagoguery, and everything in between ... often even using the same or very similar words, varying only their placement within sentences, punctuation, inflection, and/or context.

If you follow the guidelines of any of the "Style Books" of major newspapers or universities, you'll prolly not go far wrong.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 08:18 am
Could you communicate solely by vocabulary lists? Or by the elegant bare bones of wordless diagrammed sentences?
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 08:26 am
Interesting you should mention sentence diagramming, noddy. That's something which seems to have fallen from favor. Pity its not more widely taught.
0 Replies
 
Vivien
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:40 am
equally important is my vote
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:58 am
Timber--

I just finished an essay in the "Readings" section December Harper's, Sister Bernadette's Barking Dog by Kitty Burns Florey.

Like you, Ms. Florey is a devotee of diagramming sentences. There are at least two groups of grammarians in this world: Those who delight in the precision and order of sentence structure expressed in diagramming and those who consider the procedure a time-wasting, mechanical exercise.

Of course, there is a third group that wants no part of English Grammar.

I'm in the second group--I can diagram--and I can teach diagramming-- but when I have a piece of ornate prose correctly staked out on a page of notebook paper, I feel satisfaction, but no great delight.

For the visually minded--which I assume you are--diagramming is a delight.

We need delight in this world, particularly in English classrooms.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 10:40 am
I guess I've always sorta gotten a kick outta takin' stuff apart and puttin' it back together again - sometimes again and again and again - to figure out how and why it works, why someone thought to do it that way, and even to see if I can figure a different way to do it. Diagrammin' is just a form of that, to me. Other folks seem to assume somethin' will work just 'cause they think it will or want it to. I think that sort create a lotta problems for themselves, and others, whatever the pursuit.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 11:13 am
Timber--

A lot of Plato's philosophy is a bit abstruse for my fancy, but one notion that makes great good sense is the invincible balance of mathematics, the music of the spheres.

I don't register celestial melodies from math or diagramming sentences. My gleeful harmony comes from word play and wit and the complexity of human nature.

You have your music and I have mine--and the world is a glorious place.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 11:54 am
Yup. Pretty much. Some folks ain't got much musical talent though - they're mostly just loud.
0 Replies
 
Vivien
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 02:50 pm
what is this diagramming? we may do it here by another name but I've never heard of diagramming
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 04:27 pm
Diagramming Sentences

Another good treatment, from the excellent Guide to Grammar and Writing Website.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » which is important?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 02:03:41