2
   

My Movie Journal

 
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2005 01:15 pm
No no, I've been talking about the original. I haven't seen the remake yet.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2005 01:33 pm
Oh, I lost track! You likely won't like the remake. I grew up during that part of the Cold War and saw the movie in a theater. That's why we are getting a bit a different impression. It's satirical so it's meant to have a black humor complexion. I could find today after the film has aged some rather comical scenes in it, especially with the viciousness of the mother.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2005 06:07 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
If you liked "House of Flying Daggers" and " more Hero" but would like to see a more authentic historic accounting of Chinese history, rent "The Emperor and the Assassin."

Who's that by?

Not that I had even for one moment the impression that House of ... was anything like an authentic historic account by the way! Dunno if that pleads for or against the film, but in any case I dont think it was the intention either. The whole political backdrop (rebels vs soldiers) remains one-dimensional and anecdotal, really just, indeed, a backdrop.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2005 07:42 pm
We watched a charming movie called The Station Agent I highly recommend it.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 09:33 am
"The Station Agent" is a great movie -- it won a lot of awards that are just as prestigious as winning an Oscar. Patricia Clarkson is really an amazing actor.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 05:56 pm
Seems like she's in every other movie I watch.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 07:59 pm
She has been getting a lot of work and considering she's not a raving beauty it means there is hope that female characters can be portrayed realistically. Not to mention male characters -- a more unlikely protagonist than the dwarf in "The Station Agent?" I love it.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 08:24 pm
He, Peter Dinklage, was wonderful.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2005 08:28 pm
Went to the filmfestival in Rotterdam, twice; on Monday I saw a movie and a bunch of shorts (improvisations to a music track that was then also performed live); the movie was bad, some of the shorts pretty cool. Tonight I saw another two movies: one really cool (though with a critical asterisk) and one fair and enjoyable enough. Will report back with a little more info than that later. On Friday I'll hopefully see another three (if I can indeed leave work early, on which I gambled when I bought the tickets today, but which I'll still have to ask.)
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Feb, 2005 11:41 am
You might like "Lumiere" where various directors including David Lynch filmed short movies with a recreation of the original lumiere camera. Not always good but fascinating. As you'd guess, Lynch's effort is the best of the lot.

LUMIERE
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Feb, 2005 08:19 pm
That does sound interesting, LW. I'll keep my eyes out for it.

Craven, Are you still watching movies? We saw Sideways yesterday. I really enjoyed it on several levels. It's aimed squarely at the middle aged, so I don't know if younger people would enjoy it as much. It's all about reevaluating your life when life doesn't turn out as you planned. And it's all about wine, which plays a supporting character role.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2005 06:56 am
Saw Wong Kar Wai's new movie last week, 2046. Not as good as Chunking Express, Fallen Angels or Happy Together (I didnt see In The Mood for Love) - but beautifully made, nevertheless. Will write more later, I promise (already got some stuff on paper, just need to type it out some day).

I also still wanted to come back to say something about the movies I ended up seeing at the Rotterdam Filmfestival - but it would take time - but for now, these are the ones I saw there, and I'll add my "grade" and for those that were screened in the main programme, how they ended up in the audience prize rating:

Sound Check Live: David Shea plays 'Memory Lane' with Sound Bridges, with:
short: SEEM / Tijmen Hauer, Ben de Loenen 1/5
short: Transfixed / Kerry A. Laitala 4/5
short: Fossilization / Kurt D'Haeseleer 4,5/5
short: REPLAY / Matt Hulse 2,5/5
short: Streaming Past, Present Moments / Frank Scheffer 4/5

* Demi-Tarif (1/2 Price) / Isild Le Besco 1,5/5. Audience prize: 173rd place out of 190, 2.80/5.

* The Shutka Book of Records / Aleksandar Manic 4/5 (It was a great, exhilerating heartwarming movie, but I have some conceptual problems with it, hence just 4 out of 5.) Audience prize: 35th place out of 190, 4.12/5.

short: Night in a Hotel (Noc v hoteli) / Matus Libovic 4/5

* Two Syllables Behind (O dve slabiky pozadu) / Katarina Sulajova 3/5. Audience prize: 162nd place out of 190, 3.05/5.

* Leaving Home, Coming Home - A Portrait of Robert Frank / Gerald Fox 4/5. Audience prize: 22nd place out of 190, 4.23/5.

short: Ariadne / Barbara Meter 3,5/5

* Trains of Winnipeg - 14 Film Poems / Clive Holden 4/5 (a series of short films, really, some were intense and amazing, others rather forgettable. But as an integral project its convincing. That's what I thought, anyway: Audience prize: 145th place out of 190, 3.21/5.

* The Cure (Kuracja) / Maciej Cuske 2,5/5

short: The Donkey (Esh) / Areg Azatyan 1,5/5

* Just Like Old Times (Wse po-staromu) / Eva Neymann 3,5/5

* Underexposure / Oday Rasheed 3,5/5. Audience prize: 157th place out of 190, 3.09/5.
(An interesting one, this one: the first movie made by Iraqis after the fall of Saddam - they started filming even while the war was still on, having found (true story!) a storage of old, unrecorded film in one of the looted state buildings. Twenty years old it was, they didnt know whether it would even still be usable, but it was, and so they made this movie, the first half while fighting was still raging around them, then finished the next spring. This in a country where in Saddam's later years, there hadnt been any formal film education or production. The result is ambivalent and only half-succeeded as movie, but fascinating as a document of its time.)

2046 was screened at the festival as well, by the way, and ended up 58th out of 190 in the audience prize, with 3.97/5.

Picking films to see at a filmfestival remains always something of a lottery: they're all new, you have to go by what other festival visitors recommend (but by that time the films are usually sold out), the name of the director or the three lines of description in the programme - or if you splurge on a catalogue, the three paragraphs there. Result is that you'll always have some duds; but on the other hand, also always some works of near-genius that might never appear in your local art house cinema. Thats what we do it for. The odd thing is how unpredictable it really can be: some of the movies I had really wanted tickets for but couldnt get turned out on top, others way on the bottom of the audience rating; and again, some of the best films I've ever seen at the festival scored low or even near-bottom in the audience rating.

Its always still worthwhile - and theres also that special something about the excited mood of a filmfestival, all the possibilities and all the people around you excited about them too ...
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2005 08:58 am
Film festivals are a rewarding experience. Thanks for the list, nimh, and all the links. Hope they find their way onto DVD and the online rental stores.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2005 09:08 am
I posted these Variety Sundance Film Festival reviews on the Critics thread but here they are again for Craven and those who might want to add them to a rental list:

SUNDANCE COVERAGE


1. REVIEW: THUMBSUCKER
What at first looks like a standard if well-crafted tour through familiar coming-of-age territory takes some interesting detours in "Thumbsucker," writer-director Mike Mills' impressive first feature. Tale of a 17-year-old Oregon high schooler coping with semi-hapless parents and his own behavioral problems is most comparable to similarly themed Amerindie "Donnie Darko." Both offer eccentric humor within a fairly somber overall tone, support-cast surprises, and (to a lesser degree in "Thumbsucker") fable-like, hyperreal elements. "Thumbsucker" -- also like "Donnie" -- is more likely to prosper in the long haul as a home-format cult fave than in its initial arthouse tour.


2. REVIEW: BRICK
Hardboiled '30s detective fiction invades a SoCal high school with moderately tasty results in "Brick." At its core, writer-director Rian Johnson's first feature is a stunt, putting Dashiell Hammett-like tough-guy vernacular into the mouths of contempo teens. But the story, while derivative, isn't half bad, and the picture gains in finesse and confidence to the point where Johnson more or less pulls off his peril-fraught exercise. Distinctive lingo provides a talking point, and youthful cast creates possibilities for some theatrical payoff.


3. REVIEW: HOW THE GARCIA GIRLS SPENT THEIR SUMMER

Writer-director Georgina Garcia Riedel's first feature "How the Garcia Girls Spent Their Summer" -- no connection to Laura Alvarez's popular novel "How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents" -- is a dusty Arizona bordertown-set seriocomedy that slowly ingratiates with its warmth and humor. Very, very slowly. Indeed, while there are rewards to sticking with this tempest-in-teapot saga of sexual awakening across three family generations of Mexican-American women, its pacing is leisurely to the brink of stasis. Promising debut effort has minimal commercial potential in its current drawn-out form, but should travel well on the fest circuit.



4. REVIEW: DUANE HOPWOOD

What "The Good Girl" did for his "Friends" co-star Jennifer Aniston, "Duane Hopwood" may do for David Schwimmer. Pic gives the under-appreciated actor a full-course role about a character who's surrounded by failure on every side. Writer-director Matt Mulhern confidently anchors his drama-comedy about an alcoholic Atlantic City pit boss with good writing and sharp dialogue. Script never treats characters as less than human, and, though it ultimately feels slight, pic could find an aud with careful handling.



5. REVIEW: THE FALL OF FUJIMORI

Episodes out of the 10-year Peruvian presidency of Alberto Fujimori have been adapted in various forms of fiction -- including John Malkovich's film "The Dancer Upstairs" and Ann Patchett's novel "Bel Canto." But as documaker Ellen Perry seems keenly aware, there is really no need to embellish the Fujimori story, which has enough unlikely melodrama for six Italian operas. Pic can look to a healthy life internationally wherever political docus are welcome, on the tube and in possible limited theatrical situations.

(Often independent and foreign films are a great deal more rewarding than so much of the fodder cranked out of the Hollywood machine. -LW)
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2005 05:26 pm
My daughter and I were discussing Donnie Darko today. Can anyone give a synopsis of exactly what they came away with?

She thought he time travelled back. I didn't. I'd love to hear what others thought.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2005 12:02 am
Swimpy wrote:
Craven, Are you still watching movies? We saw Sideways yesterday. I really enjoyed it on several levels. It's aimed squarely at the middle aged, so I don't know if younger people would enjoy it as much. It's all about reevaluating your life when life doesn't turn out as you planned. And it's all about wine, which plays a supporting character role.


I've only watched Driving Miss Daisy recently, but I saved that film in my Netflix queue.

Lash wrote:
My daughter and I were discussing Donnie Darko today. Can anyone give a synopsis of exactly what they came away with?

She thought he time travelled back. I didn't. I'd love to hear what others thought.


I didn't like it because it was one of those films whose only plot point was figuring out what the point was. And because there is none (it's intentionally left open to multiple interpretations) it's, to me, just a quick bit of brain candy.

Thing is, many confuse murky with deep and think the world of the film. So you can see many in-depth interpretations of it if you look for them.

Just remember, there is no answer, it's a circular game so pick your favorite interpretation and that's that.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2005 12:13 am
Motorcycle Diaries - Che Guevara - I really liked the movie, powerful - could really identify with the young Che with my trips to Mexico.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2005 09:47 am
One of the many explanations of "Donnie Darko" (CAUTION: SPOILERS) with much of the supporting material actually on www.donniedarko.com:


http://www.tonystuff.co.uk/darko-spoilers.htm

There's a copy of "The Philosophy of Time Travel" in a link on that site. I don't believe Donnie ever travels back in time even though he is part of a time loop. The Director's Cut is a much better film.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Feb, 2005 02:02 pm
I picked up a film from my DVD collection, and for the life of me, cannot ever remember seeing it before. What a treat! The name of the movie is "Another Woman", a 1988 Woody Allen flick.

I was totally drawn into the film from the beginning. The film, which stars Gena Rowlands, Mia Farrow, Gene Hackman, and Blythe Danner. It is a sensitive, sophisticated film about a "woman of the intellect" who is forced to face her own feelings for the first time, at mid-life.


Link to "Another Woman"
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Feb, 2005 07:20 pm
Went to see Alias Kurban Said, a Dutch documentary on a once-famous and most mysterious book/writer. Since you won't ever get to see it anyway, I can tell you all about it.

Kurban Said was the pseudonym of the writer of Ali and Nino, a book published in Berlin in 1937 that, after a brief period of fame, was forgotten under the debris of war - only to be rediscovered upon the publication of an American translation in the late sixties. Ali and Nino is a touching love story of a young Muslim, Azeri man and a Christian, Georgian girl who fall in love in Baku. The religious barriers make them a modern-day Romeo and Juliet, but the brief interlude of freedom around 1918, when an independent democratic republic was founded after the dissolution of Tsarist Russia, affords them a chance to be together. However, the Red Army arrives and Nino has to flee, while Ali dies at the front, trying in vain to stop its offensive. Something along those lines, anyway (I havent read the book; this is what you glean about it from the film.) One main theme, underlying the love story: Europe, or Asia?

Nobody knows exactly who Kurban Said was, and his lifestory is mostly a mystery. In the movie, director Jos de Putter seeks out some of the various possibilities - each new one more perplexing.

The working theory is that the writer was one Lev Nussimbaum, the son of a Jewish oil baron, growing up in the era of Baku's first oil boom. Nussimbaum is then said to have escaped to Germany when the Soviets came, and lived in Berlin, where he was something of a star in the literary and nightlife scene. This (the timeline is quirky) was in the thirties, so to avoid the problems a Jew would have, Nussimbaum postured as a Muslim, Essad Bey, and did so with flair, appearing at social events in the traditional garb of a chief from the Caucasus. He married an American lady, who, in anger at his violent tempers, divorced him and back in America outed the story that he was really not the Bey he pretended to be. Word came back to Nazi Germany where it became a scandal, and the man fled to Austria, where he was hosted by an aristocratic couple fascinated by the Orient. Fleeing again ahead of the Anschluss he went to the Italian coastal town of Positano, where he spent his last days tormented by the gangrene that was eating away (quite literally) his leg. There, he apparently became a Fascist and applied to write anti-Soviet radio broadcasts for the regime. He is recounted to have died while listening to the one text of his that was actually broadcast.

(Picture of Essad Bey and his American wife)

An intrigueing enough story as it is. But there's some catches, too. For example. The diligent Russian women in the Baku archive muttering, "nu, latno" and "vot" can trace back a Nussimbaum family with two children, but no Leo or Lev. And where one man shows us an old picture of a particular (and in the context of this film, symbolic) celebration - namely, a Christmas party that a loving Azeri father organised for his Muslim daughter, who would not hear of Muslims not celebrating Christmas after a schoolmate told her about it - featured folks from all walks of life, including a young Jewish kid named Lev Nussimbaum; but whether Lev is Kurban Said? The man doesn't know.

Furthermore, there's pirates on the sea. An Azeri wrote the book, says his son, and so does the old man who founded a foundation/archive in the man's name. Yusif Vezirov, who used the pen-name Yusif Vezirov Chemenzeminli, was a splendid young man, a writer who in 1918 went to Istanbul as the new Republic's ambassador, and stayed there when his country fell to the Reds, making his way to France. There, he had no money but heard of a man who bought your stories and, publishing them under his own name, paid you 25% of the profits in exchange. It was this man whom he sold his own story, Ali and Nino, to, says his son. He couldnt possibly have published it under his own name, says the old man, because the Soviets might have discovered him and hunted him down. The man he sold his story to was a Jew, who was not from Baku at all but from Kiev - Leo Nussimbaum. And Nussimbaum couldn't possibly have been the author, because, the old man brandishes a manuscript, here is an article in which the author of Ali and Nino warns about how his home country is taken over by the Jews!

This takes place in a genius scene, where we see three old men drinking tea in a pretty Azeri courtyard, passionately and indignantly fighting out their "academic discussion", with the old man asserting "statistical research" that proves that, in vocabulary and language use, Ali and Nino is identical to the books the Azeri nationalist wrote in his own name, but with another of the old men retorting that the article the old man just cited included nothing about Jews, and he should know, he translated it! "You didn't even read the article!" "What, are you accusing me?! Let me tell you, as a man older and thus wiser than you - no, don't interrupt me, did I interrupt you?!" The whole scene is absolutely hilarious, evoking nothing so much as the scene in Shutka, Book of Records where middle-aged men of prominence in the Roma town contest each other about who has the best collection of music tapes and thus will win the coveted annual prize (extra jury points if you get people in the room dancing to your tape, and bonus points if you make them cry). The use of non-sequitors, intimidation and drama by these elderly gentlemen outdoes anything in Politics here, and is so blatant it's positively endearing.

That's just the beginning though. OK, Nussimbaum / Bey was feted in Berlin, and his marriage a disaster, as the still outraged granddaughter of the American wife recounts. But in Austria await the daughter and sister of Baroness Elfriede Ehrenfels, the woman who was so interested in the Orient and gave Nussimbaum/Bey refuge. The one and only writer of Ali and Nino, these two women claim - the daughter in a thin, nasal German, the sister in flourishful French - is Elfriede. After all, the daughter shows us, opening carefully preserved original documents: the contract for the book was written out to her; and the official state documents show that the pseudonym Kurban Said was referred to Elfriede. Could it be that he wrote it, but it was published under her name - what, with him being in a tricky position as refugee Jew in 1938 Austria and all? The director doesn't embarass his hosts with the question, but leaves it to us viewers to realise, merely showing how the frail Austrian girl carefully admits that, possibly, Essad Bey might have contributed bits and pieces, but - and once again she clasps the archive documents - "the directory says the pseudonym was registered as Elfriede's, and that" - hesitation creeps into her voice - "assures me that she wrote it".

This is a theme in the movie actually, part of what makes it endearing. Many of the claimants have a terribly weak case - but it means so much to them. Clinging to the one document or reference that "proves" their father/grandmother/national hero was the real Kurban Said, they desperately seek confirmation from the viewer. With wonder and awe in her voice, Elfriede's daughter recounts how, after the two novels under the name Kurban Said, her mother retreated to Greece and studied both new and ancient Greece, devoting the rest of her life to Plato - "only Plato" - "and she never wrote another book!" Pulling one marginally relevant document after another from a coffer, the Azeri man who repeats that his father was the writer, not any Nussimbaum, asks us, rhetorically: "you draw the conclusion!". The angry American granddaughter of Bey's abused wife digs up a photoalbum said wife had carried around, entitled "Friends", that has a beautiful picture of him in it as well - and she asserts to us, in the same kind of wonder: "She must have kept it by accident - isn't it amazing, that this photo is here, when she can't have meant to keep it - when it was preserved obviously by coincidence?" The director doesn't insist, merely asking: his name underneath, is that in her handwriting?" Yes, why, it is ... it's the strangest thing, isn't it?

Yes, perhaps it's that. A gentle observation of the truths - and self-deceptions? - people cling to, about those they love - because they love them so.

(Google search for "kurban said" nussimbaum ehrenfels bey)

Then there's Positano. There, too, we meet people who, a generation later, still remember Essad Bey. They didn't know who he was, whether he came from Africa or Russia - they called him "Arafat". They knew him from the cafe, where he needed to be carried to on a chair, because of the gangrene (the local doctor needing to literally saw ever new pieces of his leg off as the illness worsened), and when he died, everyone grieved. So, too, did the policeman who befriended Bey - and it's that policeman's son we talk to now, and who speaks of him as if it were his own lost, intimate friend. He actually starts crying upon recounting his death: his father had talked of him often, as a friend of the family, he explains - and thus that's how he himself thought of him - a close friend.

The many people someone leaves behind, even generations later! The impact we make - how often do you stop to think about that?

The woman of the Positano archive, in turn, conjures up the funeral papers. The grave was paid for by a man with a Turkish name, one we hadn't heard yet. And it is this man, we find out next, who in 1944 or so came to the Austrian castle and introduced himself to the Ehrenfelses, at the door, with a confident "Kurban Said, c'est moi". He could even recount how he got the name: he had met a foreigner in Turkey, and had wished him a good feast, since it was a religious holiday that day, but the foreigner had misunderstood him and taken his wish as his name: Mr. Kurban Said.

Who was right? Who knows? Bey was certainly a story-teller himself. To the Italian policeman, he recounted how he was born on the train, from Europe to Asia (from Kiev to Baku?) - and as a young boy had been kidnapped by a Georgian gang, headed by Jozef Djugashvilli, the later Stalin. Fact or fiction? If you really want to know, apparently, you should buy Tom Reiss's The Orientalist: Solving the Mystery of a Strange and Dangerous Life, which was published just this month - the result of five years of research. But do we really need to know, is what the movie seems to ask? What I liked about it was that it didnt actually try all too hard in solving the mystery - in fact, at times it almost seemed to go out of its way to preserve it, to preserve the notion that the mysterious Kurban Said could have been any number of people ... Legends, the message seemed to be, are to be treated with respect - for how they have come to mean so much to so many. And also because ...

Well, let's put it this way. In a way, the movie was almost like an ode to Europe, to the cosmopolitan continent - to the webs, tragic and happy, weaved almost arbitrarily by history between so many people of so many cultures in so many places. The language shifts from Russian to Azeri to German and French to Italian and Turkish, as one after the other protagonist emerges to stake his or her claim to "Kurban Said" - and so it's like this is what the director eventually decided to preserve: a myth, a legend, that people across the continent feel attracted to so much, that they need to claim it as their own. Making it, ultimately, the very symbol of what we share. That common, passionate affinity, the subtext seems to be, is a tribute to the power of literature as well as to the simple kindness of men - and to "Europe", itself. The Europe all those people are part of, an organic whole. And if he had solved the puzzle, he would have cut the ties of the web.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » My Movie Journal
  3. » Page 13
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/13/2025 at 05:42:19