@brianjakub,
What, was the real Susmariosep kidnapped and you are an imposter replacing him?
@brianjakub,
Dear Brian, I will just reply to you by asking you to read the post I sent to Olie, below:
Quote:[ Postscript: dear Olie, concentrate on the text at the bottom. ]
Dear Olie, I want us to now work together to come to what is the most simple explanation of something that puzzles us.
The present issue here is about the question or puzzle why there is something instead of nothing.
It is puzzling to you, but it is not puzzling to me, because I know why there is something instead of nothing, for I have come to the most simple explanation, namely, because some entity put it there or brought it about.
Now, I want to tell you that you are in the state of wanting to play the mischievous kid in class who insists on playing the idiot, in order to not have to work as to learn anything at all, but attract attention to yourself, in the present context notoriety, by bringing disturbance to the whole class.
And you have already assigned to yourself your special deficiency which humans describe as that of in earlier psychology, an idiot.
You see, from my stock reading, earlier psychologists divide educability of humans into four classes of descending deficiency of intelligence or IQ, namely:
Fool
Moron
Imbecile
Idiot
I don't see you to be a fool much less the worst, an idiot.
You just want to play the idiot in order to engage in rebellion against the purpose of this a2k forum, which is the following [texts in bold]:
Quote:About able2know
able2know's mission is to help connect people, knowledge and resources.
able2know is committed to providing these services free of charge. We believe the costs of developing and providing these services should be defrayed primarily with ethical advertising -- that is, an avoidance of pop-ups, spam, or other unreasonably obtrusive forms of advertising.
We seek to maximize the opportunities for people with similar interests and goals to connect, gather information, and network through the able2know service.
https://able2know.org/about/
The other thread I am now engaged in regularly is on
Who is your favorite physicist, which is about explanation of why there is something instead of nothing on the purely material plane of consideration.
The issue here at present I am engaged in regularly ison the non-material plane of consideration, in re the puzzle why there is something instead of nothing.
So, dear Olie, please cease and desist from playing the idiot, like one Glennn whom I have determined to no longer bother with, for he is into his dismal drama of playing the idiot in a2k forum.
It is to keep myself safe from his idiocy, that I have determined to take him as non-existing here in a2k forum.
Okay, dear Olie, please cease and desist from making your parents the biological cause of an idiot, put forth your best explanation on why there is something instead of nothing, on the non-material plane of consideration.
In the process we all members of this a2k forum will profit in the way of better and more in depth knowledge of reality.
What do you say?
@Susmariosep,
You can't force people to dialogue. Maybe he doesn't care.
@brianjakub,
I admit i have a soft spot for playing with fools, but I don't care much for people who are full of hate, and the tone of Sus' posts has become pretty hateful, of late.
@Olivier5,
Well, I suppose we are all fools at one time or another.
@brianjakub,
@Brian and Olie
Dear Brian and Olie, let us we three talk about this topic, "The complete philosophy best for mankind," what do you say, and please no more hatred.
*See Annex below.
*Annex
Quote: • Post: # 6,495,806 | Susmariosep | Fri 1 Sep, 2017 02:14 pm
@MethSaferThanTHC,
[ Postscript and Disclosure: I am here in a2k because I enjoy what the founders and owners and operators want to achieve in this their a2k forum, what about you, dear colleagues here?
I just hope that you dear colleagues here are not in this a2k forum in order to hate folks like myself.
See
* below. ]
Dear Meth, I am now in this thread which is not mine, talking about the most simple explanation of anything at all.
For example, when I ask you what is the explanation of your being here at all in this a2k forum, I like to read from you your explanation, will you accommodate to my request?
Now, suppose you ask me what is the most simple explanation of my presence in this a2k forum?
My most simple explanation is because I enjoy doing what the founders and owners and operators of this a2k want to achieve with their production of this a2k forum, which explanation is found in their about this forum declaration.
See below as follows:
*
Quote: About able2know
able2know's mission is to help connect people, knowledge and resources.
able2know is committed to providing these services free of charge. We believe the costs of developing and providing these services should be defrayed primarily with ethical advertising -- that is, an avoidance of pop-ups, spam, or other unreasonably obtrusive forms of advertising.
We seek to maximize the opportunities for people with similar interests and goals to connect, gather information, and network through the able2know service.]/b]
Connect to able2know
*
This is a test for me to know whether you can and do think, instead of engage yourself here with regurgitation of what you read from others who are equally empty-headed nonsense talkers, having nothing in their brain but hatred for folks who do think instead of hating people who do think instead of hating others who do think, instead of hating others who do think...
The test consists in you telling me where is the link of this about statement of a2k.
When you will not tell me even though you fear that you could be wrong, then I know that you have nothing of thinking in your brain except hating folks who do think.
Now, what is the most simple explanation of folks here who are full of hatred for folks like me who do think instead of hating people who do think - even though they know they could be mistaken with the fruit of their thinking, at least they have the desire to think and to expound on what they do think about.
@brianjakub,
The guy is far beyond foolish if you ask me.
@Olivier5,
Dear Olie, as usual from most dismal self-conditioning, you are coming from nowhere and going nowhere, and you don't even ever seek to find our where you are.
You are beyond educability, the only thing you are useful to yourself is to get folks to train you to clean the CR's of the world, like a robot.
Didn't I tell you that psychologists used to classify in descending steps of stupidity:*
1. Fool
2. Imbecile
3. Moron
4. Idiot
Cease and desist already from reducing yourself to the regrets of your biological cause i.e. your parents, into a robot good for cleaning the CR's of mankind, to earn your material upkeep and then die without ever know where you come from and where you are going and where you are when you were still existing (and that is not possible for you have conditioned yourself to be a robot instead of a member of the category homo sapiens).
Now, here is your chance to redeem yes redeem yourself, use your brain to think up what to you is The Complete Philosophy Best for Mankind.
*Later they psychologists don't anymore use those vituperative terms: fool, imbecile, moron, idiot, because they are used by intelligent folks to look down on fools, imbeciles, morons, and idiots among mankind who do choose to play the roles of fools, imbeciles, morons, and idiots; and intelligent mankind realized that it is not kind to use them words to describe your ilk of humans.
Dear readers here, this seems like a spam, but just in case you might miss it for not visiting The tolerant atheist thread where it came out just now, I will reproduce it here for your convenience.
Happy Reading!
Just the same it might just break as the last straw on the camel's back, the back of the powers that be here in a2k; in which case, well it would be a good sojourn here as it lasted - hehehehehehehe.
______________________________________
[ Disclosure: This post came out as an OP in a new thread with the tag Philosophy, but I can't find it anymore among My Posts.
So, I guess the powers that be here disapproved of it a topic for discussion in itself.
Now I will just post it as a message in The Tolerant Atheist and also in the Who is your favorite physicist.
And sit back to observe what will happen now.
On the other hand, I will just tell the powers that be here in a2k, I submit to your decision; thanks just the same for me still not getting banned without ceremony at all - hhehehehehehe. ]
@Olie, Brian, Fresco, Izzy, Glennn, etc., familiar colleagues here but opponents to my thinking.
The complete philosophy best for mankind
As the likes of Olie and Fresco and Izzy and their kinds of company have not yet reacted to my last posts earlier, I will now start my new thread on The complete philosophy best for mankind.
Okay, dear readers here, the first criterion in judging the complete philosophy best for mankind, is the philosophy that does not at all come forth with the stench of starting from nothingness.
Because these guys who always want to dwell on nothingness, you will not lose anything with completely dismissing them from your attention altogether, like the ilks of Lawrence Krauss, because they are a lie-saturated [lie as in dishonesty in thoughts and in words intended to lead you astray, to deceive you] rabble, no need to invest your precious time with them like the ilks of Lawrence Krauss.
First rule then in its positive formulation is the following statement from yours truly, nth times advanced by yours truly:
"The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence."
What do you say, dear readers here; but first and foremost, do your very own thinking with your nature-endowed brain, don't start trying to look up what the masters of deceits, liars like the ilks of Lawrence Krauss, he of the notoriety of something like the universe from nothing, tell you - even though there are all kinds of idiots buying their best selling book, best selling because idiots lap them up as like they love to swallow swine food scraps shill i.e. slop.
Okay, dear readers here, let us all work together to think up and systematize what we will call The complete philosophy best for mankind.
And no fear at all to contradict me with my statement, "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence."
Have you considered the idiocy of one Olivier5, he asks me what about How is there something rather than noting?
And he says that he does not know the answer, and I tell him that when he does not himself know some answer at all, how is he ever going to make an intelligent comment to my explanation at all?
The fact is the man has no balls to think for himself, he seeks the idiotic safety of claiming that he is brainless.
I told him the most simple explanation is because some entity puts it in our presence or brought it about into existence.
And you know what, he now goes into more and more odiocies, in defiant rebellion against the purpose of this a2k forum: he does not want to know at all, while a2k is all about how we can all work together to come to genuine knowledge.
