Why the sarcasm? Because the enemies in the touching story had families as well. They were going to retire in 26 days as well. EVERYONE is a person in the same way this story personifies the members of Timber's group who were killed. Therefore, what does that story add to the discussion?
I'm not saying it was a bad story; just had little to with the topic, and added little to the discussion, imho. No offense was intended.
Quote:It is wrong. No, very wrong to condemn everyone in the military for the transgressions of the few. The Court of Public Opinion can also be called a lynch mob, and our servicemen and women deserve better than that.
You have apparently already decided that the young Marine is guilty of murder, of cooly deciding to kill a person that he knew to be an unarmed, wounded prisoner who posed no threat to either himself, or his unit. What you seem to be saying is that there is a policy to mislead the world into believing that we only kill those who deserve to die. No one has in this administration, much less the military, has ever said any such thing.
There IS a policy of misleading the world into believing we kill less civilians than we actually do.
I am neither a judge nor jury; my opinion on the guilt or innocence of this soldier, as I said earlier, is
immaterial. My opinion on how it
LOOKS is another matter entirely.
You say it is wrong to condemn everyone for the transgressions of a few. I do not disagree with that, but neither do the Iraqis, especially those families who live and work in Fallujah. Get my point?
Forget the issue of whether or not the man is guilty, think about the media issue of how bad it makes us look to have a soldier
apparently shooting an unarmed man in the head in a mosque while his friend JOKES about it. Events such as this only add more ammo to the arsenal of the religious leaders and insurgent recruiters who are stirring up Anti-US sentiment in Iraq and the ME in general.
What's the point of going in and fighting insurgents if our actions are going to create more anti-US sentiment? If they are going to create more insurgents? The answer: there is no point, other than the fact we need to feel like we are doing something about the insurgency.
Don't villify me for being objective; you folks who have 'decided' that the boy is innocent are as bad as those who have decided he is guilty. I have decided that it doesn't look good no matter WHAT the truth of the situation is.
Your entire post, Asherman, is well thought out and reasoned, except for this:
Quote:There is no conspiracy by "hawks" to pursue a war policy, but when war is thrust upon us it must be reluctantly fought.
Which is pure bullsh*t and you know it.
Cycloptichorn