1
   

What does everybody think about the soldier , shooting that?

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 02:01 pm
Why the sarcasm? Because the enemies in the touching story had families as well. They were going to retire in 26 days as well. EVERYONE is a person in the same way this story personifies the members of Timber's group who were killed. Therefore, what does that story add to the discussion?

I'm not saying it was a bad story; just had little to with the topic, and added little to the discussion, imho. No offense was intended.

Quote:
It is wrong. No, very wrong to condemn everyone in the military for the transgressions of the few. The Court of Public Opinion can also be called a lynch mob, and our servicemen and women deserve better than that.

You have apparently already decided that the young Marine is guilty of murder, of cooly deciding to kill a person that he knew to be an unarmed, wounded prisoner who posed no threat to either himself, or his unit. What you seem to be saying is that there is a policy to mislead the world into believing that we only kill those who deserve to die. No one has in this administration, much less the military, has ever said any such thing.


There IS a policy of misleading the world into believing we kill less civilians than we actually do.

I am neither a judge nor jury; my opinion on the guilt or innocence of this soldier, as I said earlier, is immaterial. My opinion on how it LOOKS is another matter entirely.

You say it is wrong to condemn everyone for the transgressions of a few. I do not disagree with that, but neither do the Iraqis, especially those families who live and work in Fallujah. Get my point?

Forget the issue of whether or not the man is guilty, think about the media issue of how bad it makes us look to have a soldier apparently shooting an unarmed man in the head in a mosque while his friend JOKES about it. Events such as this only add more ammo to the arsenal of the religious leaders and insurgent recruiters who are stirring up Anti-US sentiment in Iraq and the ME in general.

What's the point of going in and fighting insurgents if our actions are going to create more anti-US sentiment? If they are going to create more insurgents? The answer: there is no point, other than the fact we need to feel like we are doing something about the insurgency.

Don't villify me for being objective; you folks who have 'decided' that the boy is innocent are as bad as those who have decided he is guilty. I have decided that it doesn't look good no matter WHAT the truth of the situation is.

Your entire post, Asherman, is well thought out and reasoned, except for this:

Quote:
There is no conspiracy by "hawks" to pursue a war policy, but when war is thrust upon us it must be reluctantly fought.


Which is pure bullsh*t and you know it.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 02:09 pm
Asherman wrote:

Quote:
With every passing day there are fewer of radicals willing and able to attack outside their strongholds.


Have you read the news concerning the netherlands and belgium... Question
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 02:23 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Forget the issue of whether or not the man is guilty, think about the media issue of how bad it makes us look to have a soldier apparently shooting an unarmed man in the head in a mosque while his friend JOKES about it. Events such as this only add more ammo to the arsenal of the religious leaders and insurgent recruiters who are stirring up Anti-US sentiment in Iraq and the ME in general.


The fact of the matter is that this is what happens in a war. In my opinion, when that soldier said "he's dead now." I don't think he was making some wisecrack to get a chuckle. I think it's the kind of black humor that people in horrible situations use to deal with it.

It might look bad to some, but I don't think there is anything that can be done about that. People will think what they want to think. You can't have soldiers in the heat of a battle worrying about how it's going to look while they are in a life or death situation.

I feel badly that this soldier had to make the choice that he made.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 02:38 pm
MerlinsGodson wrote:
Asherman wrote:
If he did not know that the wounded enemy was unarmed, and reasonably believed that deadly force was appropriate to protect himself and his squad mates, then the killing was justified. It would be murder only if the young Marine knew that the man he killed was unarmed and no threat. What was the Marines state of mind at the time? Was he capable of rationally making the decision to "execute" the wounded enemy, or did his emotional state preclude his forming the necessary intent?


Is this a facet of military law that is so completely different from civilian law?


Asherman later wrote:
The definition of murder in the UCMJ is not very different from that in the Common Law.


You should consider your words here, then, because I got the impression that you were stating that anyone is a legitimate target unless they are considered perfectly safe.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 02:58 pm
Yeah, thanks, Timber. You never know who's been where, and done what, till you know.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:00 pm
doglover wrote:
This is why I am in favor of imbedded reporters. Had that NBC reporter and his camerman not been there to shoot that video, this killing would have gone on and no one would be the wiser. It just makes me wonder how often is this happening, but no one is there to document the killing.


I doubt there will be too many embedded reporters for too much longer - I suspect they will be seen to be not in bed enough.

I would be very surprised if it were not happening reasonably often.

The likes of Asherman and Woiyo etc will say this is blind left prejudice, but, as I said earlier, this kind of war with blurry lines between civilians and combatants is, I suspect, especially conducive to this stuff - and I have read and heard enough candid war accounts from soldiers in previous wars to be sure this happens in all wars, anyway.

For instance, Robert Graves, in his WW I memoir speaks perfectly frankly of soldiers killing groups of unarmed prisoners - commenting thoughtfully that the Australians and canadians, of the Empire forces, were more prone than the English to do it - but that the Ghurkhas did it the most. And, having grown up with WW II stories from ex-service folk, I know it happened in WW II. As for Vietnam - oy veh.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:09 pm
I'm sure this kind of thing happens all the time in war. It just doesn't get filmed all the time in war.

One of the nice things about film is the incredible ability of motion pictures to convey large amounts of information to the brain quickly, and this is no exception. The reason this is a problem isn't because people thought things like this didn't go on in other wars, or when the US was fighting; it's that seeing it in such detail forces the brain to fully consider the situation instead of what we typically do, and what the hawks would preach: not think about the civilian casualties.

Once you start seeing civilian casualties/war atrocities/whatever you want to call the problems with urban warfare, it becomes harder and harder to justify the things we are doing, as what once was merely an enemy becomes a person.

Cycloptichonrn
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:32 pm
yes - and both sides try their hysterical best to de-personalize the other.

I guess it is hard to go kill folk if you are thinking of them as fellow poor slobs.

It is interesting watching the same process happen here time and time again.

For instance - I see a people talking about how dare people condemn the soldier.

Now - I haven't read all the posts - but in those I HAVE read, I haven't seen condemnation - I have seen recognition of criminal behaviour - but I have not seen condemnation.

(Now - I just KNOW someone is gonna find a personal condemnation to prove me wrong!)

I just think - "poor fellow slob" - and tremble about being in the same situation. Doesn't mean something shouldn't be done - and it seems the Army is doing stuff.

Always a bummer when we get to see what we are paying poor bastids to do - we don't like it. But this is the reality behind all the dulce et decorum crapola that paeople like to spout.

And - dammit - I am agreeing with McGentrix AGAIN!!!
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:38 pm
Quote:
http://www.opengroup.com/sports/images/(SC)Jack_Nicholson_Photo.jpg

Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns.

Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines.
You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives.

And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.

We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something.

You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.

Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!

Col Nathan R. Jessep {Jack Nicholson), A few Good Men




From an email I received earlier today (I was not the original recipient, the email was not from my son, this was forwarded to me)
Quote:
Good Morning Everybody. The following is an email from my son regarding the NBC report (with embedded reporter Kevin Sites), concerning the Marine who is being investigated for "murdering" the insurgent in Fallaja. I will be sending his mail to every news program's email I can find. I find it sickening that this Kevin Sites is even allowed to be embedded with our Marines, as this isn't the first report I've heard from him that took on a decidely unfriendly tone. My son also gave me permission to release it to anyone that wants to pass it on, as long as it remains unedited.


Quote:
This is one story of many that people normally don't hear, and one that everyone does. This is just one most don't hear: A young Marine and his cover man cautiously enter a room just recently filled with insurgents armed with Ak-47's and RPG's. There are three dead, another wailing in pain. The insurgent can be heard saying, "Mister, mister! Diktoor, diktoor(doctor)!" He is badly wounded, lying in a pool of his own blood. The Marine and his cover man slowly walk toward the injured man, scanning to make sure no enemies come from behind. In a split second, the pressure in the room greatly exceeds that of the outside, and the concussion seems to be felt before the blast is heard. Marines outside rush to the room, and look in horror as the dust gradually settles. The result is a room filled with the barely recognizable remains of the deceased, caused by an insurgent setting off several pounds of explosives. The Marines' remains are gathered by teary eyed comrades, brothers in arms, and shipped home in a box. The families can only mourn over a casket and a picture of their loved one, a life cut short by someone who hid behind a white flag.

But no one hears these stories, except those who have lived to carry remains of a friend, and the families who loved the dead. No one hears this, so no one cares. This is the story everyone hears: A young Marine and his fire team cautiously enter a room just recently filled with insurgents armed with AK-47's and RPG's. There are three dead, another wailing in pain. The insugent can be heard saying, "Mister,mister! Diktoor, diktoor(doctor)!" He is badly wounded.Suddenly, he pulls from under his bloody clothes a grenade, without the pin. The explosion rocks the room, killing one Marine, wounding the others. The young Marine catches shrapnel in the face. The next day, same Marine, same type of situation, a different story. The young Marine and his cover man enter a room with two wounded insurgents. One lies on the floor in puddle of blood, another against the wall. A reporter and his camera survey the wreckage inside, and in the background can be heard the voice of a Marine, "He's moving, he's moving!" The pop of a rifle is heard, and the insurgent against the wall is now dead. Minutes, hours later, the scene is aired on national television, and the Marine is being held for commiting a war crime. Unlawful killing.

And now, another Marine has the possibility of being burned at the stake for protecting the life of his brethren. His family now wrings their hands in grief, tears streaming down their face. Brother, should I have been in your boots, i too would have done the same. For those of you who don't know, we Marines, Band of Brothers, Jarheads, Leathernecks, etc., do not fight because we think it is right, or think it is wrong. We are here for the man to our left, and the man to our right. We choose to give our lives so that the man or woman next to us can go home and see their husbands, wives, children, friends and families.

For those of you who sit on your couches in front of your television, and choose to condemn this man's actions, I have but one thing to say to you. Get out of you recliner, lace up your boots, pick up a rifle, leave your family behind and join me. See what I've seen, walk where I have walked. To those of you who support us, my sincerest gratitude. You keep us alive. I am a Marine currently doing his second tour in Iraq. These are my opinions and mine alone. They do not represent those of the Marine Corps or of the US military, or any other.

Sincerely,
xxxxxxxxxxxx, LCPL USMC


"For those who fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected never know." -- Written on a C-ration box lid at Khe Sanh, South Vietnam, 1968

"There will be nowhere left for the insurgents to hide. We will fight them until there are none of them left to fight." U.S. Army Gen. John Abizaid, chief of U.S. Central Command


xxxxxxxxxxxx, MGySgt., USMC (Ret.) Not as lean, Not as mean, But still a Marine.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:46 pm
It is clearly time to get the heck out of Iraq. They are fighting an unwinnable battle with a questionable rational, a failing strategy and unclear goals.

Let's bring these kids home. It will save a load of heartache on all sides.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:50 pm
I think it fortunate The United States of America is not so easily defeated as may be some individuals among Her citizenry.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:52 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
It is clearly time to get the heck out of Iraq. They are fighting an unwinnable battle with a questionable rational, a failing strategy and unclear goals.

Let's bring these kids home. It will save a load of heartache on all sides.


We had a national referendum on that on Nov 2. The people selected the candidate who said we would bring the troops home when their job there is finished.
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:52 pm
Yeah, but we have to carrry them on our backs.
0 Replies
 
Steppenwolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 03:53 pm
Larry434 wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
It is clearly time to get the heck out of Iraq. They are fighting an unwinnable battle with a questionable rational, a failing strategy and unclear goals.

Let's bring these kids home. It will save a load of heartache on all sides.


We had a national referendum on that on Nov 2. The people selected the candidate who said we would bring the troops home when their job there is finished.


Neither of the candidates expressed an interest in leaving Iraq unfinished.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:04 pm
Neither of the candidates expressed an interest in leaving Iraq unfinished.

Kerry expressed an interest in turning the job over to the UN and bringing our troops home which, given past performance of the UN, is leaving the job unfinished
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:21 pm
The US has lost Iraq- period. This is a unwinnable war and every day spent there means more tragedy.

There is no way that the US, which much of the country now deeply despises and sees as an occupier, is ever going to set up any reasonable government. If this war was ever winnable, there is now too much damage.

I feel torn about this kid. I understand the impossible choices these kids have to make as part of their responsibility to their country. But this kid allegedly broke the law and commited a crime that is internationally considered immoral.

Not much has been said about the Iraqi life that was lost. Was this another "kid" doing what he felt was the responsibility to his country? Does anyone know if this Iraqi kid was involved in atrocities other than doing what he could to resist the occupation of his country?

Both of these lifes, along with countless others are irreprepably damaged or lost for a conflict that can never accomplish lofty goals that have been questionable from the start.

The fact is, the future of Iraq needs to be settled by the Iraqi's without a US installed government or US meddling. The sooner the US gets out, the better for all.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:28 pm
The fact is, the future of Iraq needs to be settled by the Iraqi's without a US installed government or US meddling.

And providing an environment conducive to that being done in free elections in Iraq in January, as they were in Afghanistan earlier this month is a major milestone in the overall job we are about there.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:31 pm
We broke it so we own it (the pottery barn rule). The war is not unwinable but the US has to abandon many of it's assumptions and goals. Iraq under Hussain, and before, was a modern secular state run by a fascist/socialist political movement. If we want to win we have to start where they left off and that is provide security and services. We are doing the first and have completely ignored the second. So to begin with we have to revers our priorities. But that will require a long term commitment and will be expensive.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:34 pm
Acquiunk wrote:
We broke it so we own it (the pottery barn rule). The war is not unwinable but the US has to abandon many of it's assumptions and goals. Iraq under Hussain, and before, was a modern secular state run by a fascist/socialist political movement. If we want to win we have to start where they left off and that is provide security and services. We are doing the first and have completely ignored the second. So to begin with we have to revers our priorities. But that will require a long term commitment and will be expensive.


I think this administration is committed to staying the course toward the ultimate goals, will make necessary course adjustments along the way, and provide the resources to finish the job that so many have given their lives for.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Nov, 2004 04:38 pm
The administration does not need a course readjustment, it needs a radical reoganization. All they have at the moment are hammers, and they are busting everything up. The present policy is a classic model of what not to do in an occupation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 11:45:23