1
   

Merck Decided Against 2000 Vioxx Study

 
 
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2004 12:17 pm
Quote:
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Top executives at pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. Inc. decided in May 2000 against developing a study to test directly whether its Vioxx painkiller drug might pose a heart risk, The New York Times reported on Saturday.

Just two months after results from a clinical trial suggested concerns the popular anti-arthritis drug might cause a higher risk of heart attacks, company scientists questioned whether a focused trial was possible and marketing executives apparently feared one would undermine sales, the Times reported in an article on its Web site.
Merck recalled Vioxx on Sept. 30 this year after a separate long-term clinical trial already under way in 2000 showed it doubled the risk of heart attack and strokes in patients who had taken it for over 18 months to prevent recurrence of colon polyps. Merck's stock has fallen almost 38 percent since.

According to the Times report, based on what it called a detailed reconstruction of Merck's handling of Vioxx, Merck scientists wondered in May 2000 whether a study to determine Vioxx's cardiovascular risks, which might have required as many as 50,000 patients, was even possible.

The Times reported that a slide prepared for a meeting of top executives said: "At present, there is no compelling marketing need for such a study. Data would not be available during the critical period. The implied message is not favorable."

The report is to appear in the Times' Sunday edition.

Merck executives said this week the company acted responsibly, voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx as soon as it had clear evidence the drug was harmful. They said that even if they had conducted the type of study they discussed internally and rejected in 2000, the company might not have detected Vioxx's risks any sooner.

"Merck wasn't dragging its feet," said Kenneth C. Frazier, the company's general counsel. "It's pretty hard for me to imagine that you could have done this more quickly than we did."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which Merck consulted, also agreed that designing a trial to specifically assess Vioxx's cardiovascular risks would have been difficult and, unless constructed to provide benefits to patients, would have been unethical as well, the paper said.

The FDA recently published a study estimating Vioxx could have caused about 28,000 heart attacks or deaths since it was approved in 1999. An estimated 20 million Americans have taken Vioxx.



Link to Merck Story

What do you think about this?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 834 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2004 12:21 pm
I think I really dislike the drug industry.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Nov, 2004 12:56 pm
I would love to know why the FDA did not figure this out BEFORE they gave Merck a license to sell the stuff. It takes that agency so long to approve something, and then the stuff is no damn good. Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Jan, 2005 01:57 am
Quote:
Painkiller linked to 140,000 heart attacks in patients
By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor
25 January 2005


A blockbuster drug launched five years ago as a revolutionary treatment for arthritis may have caused up to 140,000 heart attacks in US patients of whom 44 per cent died, scientists said yesterday, making it the world's worst drug disaster.

Vioxx, a new type of painkiller launched in 1999, was one of the most heavily promoted drugs in history, with sales in 80 countries and a global market of 80 million patients.

More than 400,000 patients were taking it in Britain, where it could have caused up to 1,000 heart attacks and deaths.

Last September, the manufacturer, Merck & Co, withdrew the drug from the market after evidence emerged linking it with heart problems.

Now, a study of 1.4 million people in California shows that those taking Vioxx had a one-third higher chance of having a heart attack than those taking other painkillers.

David Graham, of the US Food and Drug Administration, and colleagues concluded: "An estimated 88,000 to 140,000 excess cases of serious coronary heart disease probably occurred in the USA over the market life of rofecoxib [Vioxx]. The US national estimate of the case-fatality rate was 44 per cent, which suggests that many of the excess cases attributable to rofecoxib use were fatal." The results, published online by The Lancet, will be seized on by critics of the pharmaceutical industry as evidence of the failure of the drug regulatory system to protect the public. Dr Graham had earlier estimated that Vioxx may have caused up to 27,000 heart attacks but the new study caused him to upgrade the estimate by five times.

Doctors on both sides of the Atlantic have warned of a public health emergency over other painkillers in the same class, known as Cox-2 inhibitors, which could also pose a risk.

A report in The New England Journal of Medicine last October said studies since 1999 had repeatedly indicated a danger with Vioxx. Drug regulators made Merck include a warning in the drug package but never ordered a definitive trial.

Professor David Webb, of the clinical pharmacology unit at the University of Edinburgh, says in The Lancet: "It falls to the manufacturers, under the careful review of the regulatory authorities, to provide evidence that this class of drugs is safe."

Asked if this was the worst drugs disaster in history, Professor Webb said: "Quite possibly because these drugs were very widely used."

The previous worst disaster involved the drug Tambocor (flecainide) prescribed to patients with irregular heartbeats. It was estimated to have killed 50,000 patients in the Seventies and Eighties.

The European Drug Safety Agency is conducting an urgent safety review of all the Cox-2 inhibitors, which have a combined global sale of $10bn (£6bn). Last month, the UK Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency advised all patients still taking Vioxx, estimated at 750,000, to review their treatment with their doctor.
Source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Merck Decided Against 2000 Vioxx Study
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 12:28:41