1
   

How do I stir up the Cambridge Philosophy budget scoffers?

 
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 May, 2005 08:48 pm
Spendius.....

I bought the book
I'll read it on the plane returning home. Have we decided on a name for the thread?

I may not be home until late Monday
but I'll be back sometime early next week.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 May, 2005 07:55 am
Lola:-

Yes.Francis started it.Plain "SALAMMBO".She had a flat face.She didn't need to be beautiful in view of the fact that Matho was a serious Eebie and he hadn't seen a washed and scented piece of tail in many a long month.So plain SALAMMBO suits just fine.And if Francis wants to claim he had this literary reading in mind when he chose it I won't be arguing with him.

I hope you enjoy the book as you snuggle up in the metal tube which conveys you across the fly-over states.The book as a bridge over troubled waters just like the plane.Nice.

Arrive safely.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 06:45 am
I've read chapter one and the Introduction. It's excellent reading so far. Matho, poor soul is in misery. Spendius seems to be in control so far. He's a subversive little fellow......possibly not to be trusted. We'll see.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:47 am
Lola:-

No man can be trusted when he's backed up against a wall and Spendius certainly is that.If you find any of us trustworthy it is only because we are not.We can afford to be decent.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 08:57 am
spendius wrote:
Lola:-

No man can be trusted when he's backed up against a wall and Spendius certainly is that.If you find any of us trustworthy it is only because we are not.We can afford to be decent.


If you're including women in this statement, I agree with you. No one can be trusted when backed against a wall....yes
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 May, 2005 10:01 am
Lola:-

I don't care to speak on behalf of women.It is much to presumptious.Mathosian even.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 May, 2005 06:07 am
If anybody out there knows Mr John Carey perhaps they would be good enough to tell him about this thread.On here he could stick his Down With The Dons thesis up 'em with the minimum of editorial control.

That would be entertaining.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2005 05:43 pm
Mr. John Carey? Ummm, Spendi, do you mean John Kerry?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2005 05:46 pm
Oh Lola:-

I have really missed you.

I have been tangled up in your absence with a bunch of sex maniacs.It was horrible.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2005 06:43 pm
spendius wrote:
Oh Lola:-

I have really missed you.

I have been tangled up in your absence with a bunch of sex maniacs.It was horrible.


Oh you loved it. Please be honest!
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 May, 2005 07:05 pm
A horrible sex maniac......a man's best friend.

See you tomorrow maybe. I'm still working like a mad woman.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 07:29 am
spendius? Are we still trying to de-throne the CPD?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 08:01 am
Lola:-

Hope you are well.

Gee-I had some fun yesterday,a day off here.That Trivia does my head in.

CPD? Sure!Why not?Smoke the buggers out is what I say.

I have to split just now but I'll be back.This is better than the pub.Not so many jackasses.

Maybe we should all get on at once and get blotto together.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 May, 2005 08:04 am
Quote:
Maybe we should all get on at once and get blotto together.


Isn't that what we have been doing? Very funny.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 07:03 am
Mr Appleyard is going after art critics.

That's a bigger job than ours.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 07:30 am
Who, may I ask is Appleyard?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 07:55 am
Brian.Sunday Times.Culture section mainly.Not bad.
Not great either.Bit of a wind-sock.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jun, 2005 07:56 am
I have been wondering what action to take to remind hard pressed taxpayers that there are a large number of professional philosophers out there,not just in Cambridge,who live a nice and cosy existence at our expense without providing us with anything we can utilise in our daily lives unlike milkmen,binmen,can-can dancers and pub landlords.

Can anybody provide an explanation of what looks to be,on the face of it,a ridiculous state of affairs.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jun, 2005 07:59 am
might they be thought of as entertainers?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Jun, 2005 08:22 am
That must be why I can hear the sound of one hand clapping then.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 06/17/2024 at 08:20:34