23
   

The anti-gay marriage movement IS homophobic

 
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:25 pm
So you believe that it is right to discriminate?
You believe that discrimination against gays is OK?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:26 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Chumly,

Forgive me! aktorist said that! I am so sorry! I misquoted! Embarrassed
No probs, Mom. BTW I have a balck Chow Chow named Daizey!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:27 pm
aktorist,

I have answered those questions numerous times.
0 Replies
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:32 pm
Your quiet stance affirms that you believe that discrimination against gays is not wrong.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:35 pm
No, that is not what it is.

I have answered that question numerous times in this thread. Why do you keep asking it over and over again?
0 Replies
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:38 pm
And yet, all I need once more is this simple choice.

Discrimination against gays is not wrong.

You have so far agreed with this. I just need one post. I don't care about what you have posted before. Either you agree, or you disagree. Giving an answer other than these two means that you agree.

Don't dodge the question. Just answer it one more time.
Agree or disagree? You must choose one.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 10:48 pm
It is wrong to discriminate against anyone for what they are, who they are, or what they believe.

Happy now? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:19 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
msolga,

That is exactly what I am talking about. You are essentially asking me to give up my right to vote the way I want to vote because of someone else's rights. Why? What makes their rights more important than mine or yours, for that matter?


If another religion, with many adherents in the US, believed that their god decreed that women should remain at home and not be allowed to take part in education, work etc, because for women to do so was sinful, and this group was, in all sincerity and adherence to its concept of divine demand, promoting its beliefs, and the US community refused to endorse and act on this group's beliefs, and insisted that women be allowed full civil rights - would you consider that their rights were being infringed upon by the American community?

Would they be discriminated against if they were not permitted to insist that others follow theitr beliefs?

This vote thing is a furphy, by the way.


What is being argued about is your apparent belief that granting civil rights somehow infringes upon your rights.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:23 pm
Isn't amazing how people use denail to mask their bigotry?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:24 pm
Wot they hammerin' denail in with?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:25 pm
Gosh, give me a chance to edit. Good grief!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:26 pm
Nah.

'Tis the quich and the ded round here....
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 11:59 pm
Is that Australian for beer?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 12:02 am
Noe.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 01:51 am
dlowan wrote:

This vote thing is a furphy, by the way.


Yes, I think so, too, Deb.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 03:09 am
Her position is more akin, actually, to wishing to deny others a vote, than anything else.


It's mind bending.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 03:29 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Setanta Wrote:

Quote:
No one said you cannot vote the way you wish to do. You are simply being informed that voting against homosexual marriage is voting against the basic civil rights of a significant proportion of the population based upon your religious bigotry.


No, but I am being told that the way I would vote is wrong. And, since I am protected under the Constitution of the United States to vote the way I want NO MATTER WHAT (caps for emphasis only), no one has the right to tell me differently.

I will not vote for something that I believe is wrong. Flat out period. That's just the way it is. Now, I have said if I was given the opportunity to vote I would abstain. That doesn't seem to be enough for some of you.
So you vote the way god tells you to according to Christianity?
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 04:49 am
Amigo wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
Setanta Wrote:

Quote:
No one said you cannot vote the way you wish to do. You are simply being informed that voting against homosexual marriage is voting against the basic civil rights of a significant proportion of the population based upon your religious bigotry.


No, but I am being told that the way I would vote is wrong. And, since I am protected under the Constitution of the United States to vote the way I want NO MATTER WHAT (caps for emphasis only), no one has the right to tell me differently.

I will not vote for something that I believe is wrong. Flat out period. That's just the way it is. Now, I have said if I was given the opportunity to vote I would abstain. That doesn't seem to be enough for some of you.
So you vote the way god tells you to according to Christianity?



Momma Angel can vote any way she wants on any issue placed on the ballot. In America, we don't discriminate against bigots. They have just as much right to vote as the non-bigots. That is not in question.

The fact that she claims that no one can say she's wrong for being a bigot simply because she wraps her bigotry in the right to vote is hilarious.

The fact that she has announced that she would cast her vote to discriminate against an entire class of people whom she despises and to deprive them of the basic rights that she claims for herself tells me she's not the kind of person that I would choose as my friend. Bigotry is disgusting.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 05:17 am
Actually, she says she would abstain, for reasons I have yet to be able to find.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 05:45 am
msolga wrote:
dlowan wrote:

This vote thing is a furphy, by the way.


Yes, I think so, too, Deb.


Could either of you two ladies translate 'furphy' ferme, please?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New York New York! - Discussion by jcboy
Prop 8? - Discussion by majikal
Gay Marriage - Discussion by blatham
Gay Marriage -- An Old Post Revisited - Discussion by pavarasra
Who doesn't back gay marriage? - Question by The Pentacle Queen
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/01/2025 at 07:08:03