@Albuquerque,
So much straw man and conflation on the topic of Free Will all in the name of maintaining the Social organization status quo...
While the talk was interesting overall I have to give a thumbs down as it was a total failure of accessing how Science and reductionism have been working all along, and still work...not good to use two sets of rules for convenience even if the excuse is that you are talking to common people.
I perfectly understand what is meant with change of domains of operations like Chess and Checkers or Cartoons and dreams...all those things are REAL phenomena or epiphenomena, all fair and well. The misstep forward is when you pull "emergence" out of a "magic box" to explain stuff to the common Joe...this is why I have indeed a bias in favour of retro causation, or if you prefer a perfect correlation of events in the whole spectrum of all spacetime ...nothing "emerges"..THINGS ARE, and in this regard Parmenides was right!
Finally oh hell yes we are going to eventually have to change how we think about guilt, sin, bad and good, and start a linguistic more sophisticated way of talking with each other, the revolution will be as important as the invention of agriculture or the internet...people are systems that may be operating "poorly" for a given system of social organization, but correctly in the overarching ecosystem where they fill a needed niche that was not extinct by natural selection. This is how we should frame it and follow the consequences inferring how to make sense of the new paradigm.
I could go on all night debating the dismissive tone presented here on the topic of Free Will and pointing out numerous examples including the future evolution of Legal systems in light of what we come to realise regarding our persistent naive view that faulting others is not just a good mechanism, but assuming it must be the best one to make Society work. While it is true a psychopath must be locked for obvious reasons it is not true one must shame him...there are lots of things left out of this pseudo rationalization on keeping the status quo, first one of all the attitude being unscientific!
Not all was bad far from it and thus I want to express appreciation for Sean attempt at tackling a huge and diverse collection of topics he engages with. He is an important legitimate thinker of our time, even when I disagree with what he says here n there! Thank you all for your time and happy holidays!