@Albuquerque,
Here is the edited final reply to the Closer to Truth messy video:
First of all percepts are true percepts they just don't belong to what you call "base reality", being the case that they work within a specific domain of Reality, just like dreams do.
Second I fully disagree with the fixation on the "self"...hence why I rather talk about embodied cognition and information transfer of percepts in our domain. Anyone in the exact same informational circumstance would be "yourself"...you don't own your nature!
Finally I also disagree we don't have access to the base code, as I believe the base code shows up in different domains as a omnipresent necessary fractal...so while yes indeed the operating system is different from what is here called base reality the same universal principles apply to both....in fact the whole idea of what comes before of after, the idea that some things are more fundamental then others is a failure at grasping the holistic relation of the whole thing as being all True.
I rather speak of distinct domains of operations,like checkers, or chess or dreams, and state that in spite of the domain you are operating within there is a overarching Universal fractal pattern that connects all these different domains. There is no "before" nor "after", there is BEING and Truth is everything! The problem is not about true or false statements rather we use the metaphor of true or false statements when we change domains...e.g. Donald Duck or Mickey mouse does not exist outside the cartoons domain! Which is totally different from saying they do not exist at all. That which is not cannot be conceived off. Hence why absolute Nothingness is a misleading concept when pushed out of relativistic metaphorical pragmatical use.