2
   

My documentaries, the documentaries that I recommend

 
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Mar, 2020 04:35 pm
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Mar, 2020 12:27 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
An atheist POV about BEING:

Father = Everything = Ground of all being = Zero-sum = Death
Son = Finite = Life = Cousnciousness = Epistemic search
Spirit = Process = Information = Ratio = The Way

Fractals connect all three.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Mar, 2020 10:08 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 06:39 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Mar, 2020 09:39 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 03:22 am
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 04:07 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
indeed lots of old words and misconceptions about what they really mean...

...For one all there is in all time frames is real. Therefore necessary because by definition is all there ever will be and ever was. There is closure and fractals are the best evidence for it.

For a second all we can know about what is real is in experiencing which itself is more primitive than consciousness. Awareness is the Experience of experiencing, again phenomena.

For a third consciousness, itself does not imply free will nor agency, but rather a correlation of phenomena that mirrors awareness of patterns including awareness of epistemological inquiry and its narrative on potential alternative realities and its statistical probabilities limited by the computational power of the inquirer itself which is part of the totality.

The fact of the matter is that whenever we look back all history of phenomenology is one event, not many alternative events. Consciousness is therefore not what it seems. Not free, not causal, but just a correlation of a phenomenal narrative that we call the "physical" the material.



Bottom line, I don't agree either with classical rationalism nor with classical physicalism. Both concepts are obscure when we try to recur to their etymological classical cultural framing.
Consciousness is not free nor causal but rather a deterministic or perfectly correlated flow of necessary awareness of phenomena about phenomena which we then define as physical or real.

What we have is the Experience of experiencing rather than the experiencing of experience. The phenomena are the Noumena and complexity, all the complexity precedes the simplicity. This is why the idea of "emergence" is a mistake. I have a very intuitive feeling that the whole future commands the past and not the other way around. Just like a projection. There is nothing emergent when we see things from this pov.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 02:04 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,


You can't just throw in the word transcendent to have a sort of super kind of meaning. Purpose is by definition ultimate if there is any.
If Time is not fundamental any time frame of reference on which phenomena manifest themselves is NECESSARY. There is no beginning for any time frame of reference. Just a correlated set of events or phenomena, including not free, not causal awareness.
Again, the Experience of experiencing, as I don't seem to be able to tweak the amount of dopamine or serotonin or adrenaline I release from my own free will. I don't tweak perceptual conditions nor intellectual depth. The species themselves don't tweak what they are! A cat cannot decide to be a dog. Therefore and once again we have the experience of experiencing and not the experiencing of deciding which experiences we have.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 02:35 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
By the way, while we are debunking the meaning of old assertions like "perfectly good" when talking about "God" or BEING, that just means what is the case. What is the case is perfect in the sense that it is finished, and not contingent to a time boundary that precedes or procedes from what is the case.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 03:00 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Apr, 2020 10:37 pm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/04/2020 at 03:48:15