@centrox,
We are following your information, Centrox. As I mentioned to Izzy, which he has dishonestly failed to bring to your attention,
"How is that of any importance, of greater importance than the fact that a University of Alaska PhD, forensic engineer says that the chance of WTC7 coming down as a result of normal office fires - NIST's conclusion is "zero"?
===============
[everything in bold is mine]
Daniel Sheehan [lawyer]: "On a scale of 1 to a 100, ... how probable do you think it is, or how possible do you think it is that this building
[WTC7] could have collapsed simply because of the fires?"
Professor Hulsey: "Zero."
13:09 on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf1ewgbq4fY
Do you understand the implications of that little exchange between the lawyer and Prof Hulsey, Centrox?