1
   

Do We Need Foreign Observers for the Elections?

 
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Oct, 2004 04:27 pm
Xena wrote:
Violence to GOP HQ is not a joke.


nope. it's what's inside the gop hq that's a joke. and it is not funny.


Xena wrote:
This is what the country is seeing from the Dems, and it is not pretty..


you must have been too busy declaring the republican party the sole repository of american patriotism a week or two back when i talked about how a friend had his mirror kicked off, the side of his car keyed and the kerry/edwards sign from the lawn torn up and thrown on the hood.

i don't condone this kind of $hit from either side. it is really disingenuous of you to pretend that there are no republicans that get out of control with this stuff.
0 Replies
 
Xena
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Oct, 2004 05:49 pm
Noooo, I don't condone it on either side!

When talking about the shots fired into HQ's, I haven't seen anything like that reported on the Republican side....

That is what I said was no joke! It's is pretty disgusting how everybody is acting right now....
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Oct, 2004 08:36 pm
well, i will agree with you on that.

the landscape has been arranged in such a way that the one true fact in this whole election cycle, that we are all americans first, has been been buried beneath a mound of partisan rhetoric.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Oct, 2004 05:34 am
No joke either is the bugging of the Republican campaign headquarters. This revelation of dem dirty trick was passed onto the press in the week preceding the election. The dem candidate went on to lose.

These events happened in Texas. The Republican campaign was being run by Carl Rove. The post-election police investigation found that the most probable source of the bug was Rove himself.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Oct, 2004 06:33 am
Them dirty Democrats, hiring Rove to do their heinous deeds like that.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Oct, 2004 07:42 am
Speaking of Rove, The New Yorker has the last photos Richard Avedon took and among them is one of Rove. He looks like a cherubic uncle.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2004 08:04 pm
blatham wrote:
No joke either is the bugging of the Republican campaign headquarters. This revelation of dem dirty trick was passed onto the press in the week preceding the election. The dem candidate went on to lose.

These events happened in Texas. The Republican campaign was being run by Carl Rove. The post-election police investigation found that the most probable source of the bug was Rove himself.


Sounds apocryphal

Have a source or is this something you heard or read?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2004 08:26 pm
There are always vigorous protestations when the label "Liberal" is used on these threads, and yet, based on a almost stereotypical profile of a "Liberal," one can so often predict how the usual suspects will respond to any given subject.

Foreign observers of American elections for example:

The Liberal's expression of disdain for his or her own nation - We think we're so great, sticking our noses in the business of the rest of the world, why shouldn't other countries stick their noses in ours? - We need all of the help we can get. - If it happened, everyone would see we're not such a beacon of democracy after all.

The Liberal's near worship of all things European as manifested by the presumption that while Americans can't be trusted in such matters, Europeans surely can.

The Liberal's reliance on canned hyperbole - Thousands upon thousands of black Americans were disenfranchised (now there's a word Liberals have taken to as a baby take to its mother's teat)back in 2000 and will be again in 2004.

Gosh, it must really suck having such negative feelings about your country and fellow citizens, especially when you're a member of the party of Hope. I guess you must be a big fan of Hope if you have to live in a rat's nest like the US, otherwise you might just shoot yourself.

But wait, maybe it's OK if your realization of what a rat's nest it is sets you apart from the great unwashed who swig their beer, shoot their guns and check their brains at the flag draped door. Who needs Hope when you have Smug Sanctimony?
0 Replies
 
Ygge
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 12:08 pm
The sad thing about all of this was that some of the observers where denied access to the voting places... I mean how can we convince other countries to submit them selves to inspections, when one of the worlds most stable, best functioning democraties will not allow it.. I think this is setting a bad example..
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 12:11 pm
Ygge wrote:
The sad thing about all of this was that some of the observers where denied access to the voting places... I mean how can we convince other countries to submit them selves to inspections, when one of the worlds most stable, best functioning democraties will not allow it.. I think this is setting a bad example..


Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.
0 Replies
 
Ygge
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 12:21 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Ygge wrote:
The sad thing about all of this was that some of the observers where denied access to the voting places... I mean how can we convince other countries to submit them selves to inspections, when one of the worlds most stable, best functioning democraties will not allow it.. I think this is setting a bad example..


Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.
Yes, but imho it smells of hypocrasy to submit others to inspections when you refuse to suffer them yourselves.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 01:11 pm
Ticomaya wrote:


Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.


Well, when such things like Florida 2000, double-registrations, lost votes etc happen somewhere else, usually the USA asks the OSCE to send observers. (See their website for more about it.)

Quote:
Belarus cracks down on US election
11/05/2004 12:24
The statement from Minsk was very similar to American and European criticism in Belarus elections

The government of Belarus decided to respond to the Western criticism. When the results of the US presidential election were exposed, the Belarus Foreign Ministry released a statement, in which Bush's win was called doubtful. According to Belarus officials, the US election was neither democratic, nor transparent.

The statement particularly runs: "According to the information received from independent observers and mass media outlets, several fundamental international election requirements, including the ones of OSCE's Copenhagen document signed in 1990, were broken." Spokespeople for the Belarus Foreign Ministry said that the American government had not removed serious flaws in the election system of the United States. "That is why we are not surprised with numerous messages about the missing absentee ballots, malfunctions in the work of the electronic voting system, intimidation of electors, the absence of voters in registration lists, impossibility to obtain information about the voting process from electoral committees," the statement says.

In addition, Belarus officials pointed out that international observers did not have a free access to the polls in certain states. The Foreign Ministry of Belarus hopes that the mission of international observers of the OSCE Bureau for Democratic Institutes and Human Rights will "objectively reflect the election campaign in the US and give an adequate estimation of the election," Interfax reports.

However, it is hard to presume that governmental officials of Belarus thought the OSCE would cast doubts on the results of the US election. Observers did not notice something extraordinary in the voting. In the words from the head of the mission of the OSCE observers, the Austrian Ambassador Christian Strohal, there were no rough violations of the norms of democratic elections registered. Strohal referred to the reported infringements as "local misunderstandings."

The statement from the Belarus Foreign Ministry would have probably caused a reaction in European states and in the USA, if it did not look like a response to criticism of the referendum and parliamentary elections in Belarus. The statement from Minsk was very similar to what American and European officials said about the Belarus elections a short time ago. Belarus did not impose any sanctions, though. Most likely, the USA will simply ignore the Belarussian opinion on the election.

Source: Pravda
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 01:17 pm
Quote:
Foreign monitors barred from some US polling stations: OSCE observer

Tue Nov 2, 5:51 PM ET


COPENHAGEN (AFP) - Some observers from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), a Europe-wide security and rights forum, were barred from entering some polling stations in the United States, one of them said.

"We were not allowed to enter polling stations," said Soeren Soendergaard, a Danish parliamentary deputy.


"Although we were officially invited to follow the (US presidential) election, the message was not passed on to the polling stations," he told the Danish news agency Ritzau

He said he had been personally refused admission at three out of four polling stations in Columbus, Ohio.


"It's the limit of arrogance," complained the left-wing deputy, representing the 55-nation OSCE, a pan-European body of which the US is a member and whose duties include monitoring elections to ensure fair play.


Another Danish OSCE observer, conservative Carina Christensen, reported less serious irregularities in Jacksonville, Florida, but said police had been called when she tried to visit a Republican office.


She and three other delegation members had been well received by local representatives of the Democrat Party who had ensured their access to polling stations.


But Republicans were less welcoming. "We were denied entry to a local Republican office in Orlando," she told Ritzau: "They called the police, saying they had received guidelines from Washington to do so."


Socialist deputy Kamel Qureshi said Americans appeared basically annoyed at the presence of foreign observers.


The OSCE team was invited by the State Department. They were not conducting full-scale monitoring but collecting impressions of American democratic practice for a later report.


The State Department on Monday downplayed their presence.


"The presence of OSCE election observers we don't find troubling at all," said State Department spokesman Adam Ereli. "This is something that all OSCE members routinely do, so this is no exception."


Although US officials have always issued invitations and had foreign observers before, it is "new in the sense that this is the first time they've been at a presidential election, and they've deployed or they've been here in these numbers," Ereli said.


Their visit has raised the anger of conservative US commentators and politicians, angry that the US electoral process would be scrutinized like an election in Ukraine or Azerbaijan.


The OSCE mission had made it known that they would look particularly at electronic voting machines in states such as Florida.


The machines have been criticized as being unreliable and vulnerable to hacking.


The OSCE said in September it believed the weakness in US elections apparent in 2000 would not be fully corrected in time for Tuesday's vote.


The OSCE is heavily involved throughout the Balkans, where the former Yugoslav republics are trying to overcome the damage wrought by the wars of the 1990s and prepare themselves for membership of NATO and the European Union.
source: Yahoo
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 01:37 pm
Quote:
"Belarus cracks down on US election"


Laughing
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 02:06 pm
Just heard from two Texas posters at a cooking forum I frequent. When they checked their electronic voting receipts, the results were the opposite of what they'd voted. They asked to vote again, and did, but couldn't get confirmation that their original votes were spoiled. They're planning to pursue this.

I'd seen this complaint on the Dem blog already, but not from anyone I know, so thoughtt it was just hot wind blowing. Pffffffft.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 03:53 pm
Tico
Quote:
Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.


Yes and the 2000 election bore that out. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 03:55 pm
Ticomaya wrote:

Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.


Some third world countries have far better functioning election processes than do we.

It's not good to assume that our wealth automatically grants us good processes, and such attitudes are an impediment to amelioration of said processes.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 04:30 pm
If the electronic stuff is as unreliable as it seems to be, why on earth is it persisted with?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 04:34 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:

Because we are the worlds most stable, best functioning democracy, and we don't need their help. We aren't a third-world country, or trying to do this for the first time without a clue.


Some third world countries have far better functioning election processes than do we.

It's not good to assume that our wealth automatically grants us good processes, and such attitudes are an impediment to amelioration of said processes.


Why conclude I've assumed our wealth grants us a "good process"? But whether we have a good process or not, my point bears repeating: We don't need their help.

I'm not sure to which third world countries you are referring, but I suppose if you have a population equal to that of New York City (or less), and you only have a few issues on the ballot, you could have a fairly simple election process, and it might function quite well. However, I suspect there is no country in the world that has on its election day anywhere near the logistical problems we face in the US, brought upon by the confluence of the population of the US, the fact we have 50+ "states" voting, each of which having their own unique races and issues, and innumerable counties, again each with its own myriad of local elections and issues.

On one hand, I suppose I don't understand what benefit is hoped to be gained by allowing foreign observers in to watch our elections. Are they watching only the single vote for our President, or are they also observing the votes for the County Register of Deeds? If they spot an irregularity, to what entity would they report, and for what purpose? Aren't elections regulated by the individual States? Will the Federal Government require States to allow these observers in?

But on the other hand, I don't really care. If the observers want to come and observe, why not? Maybe they can tell us something we didn't already know. Seems like the resources could best be used elsewhere, though.
0 Replies
 
cannistershot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Nov, 2004 04:35 pm
Microsoft.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 12:29:42