PC language and the pending invasion (alas, it's all I can think about, this confounded "war"):
Language "helps to create a climate in which the need for military action appears to be self-evident," the editors write in their introduction to
Collateral Language: A User's Guide To America's New War (NYU Press). "Almost immediately after Sept. 11, supposedly `objective' journalists were echoing politicians and pundits by saying `The United States has no choice but to respond,' thereby giving the subsequent war an aura of inevitability.''
And in so doing, the media, which give more of a platform to military experts than to voices of protest, obscure the true impact on human beings who are the "collateral damage'' in "precision air strikes'' or "targeted killings.''
As the editors point out: "To speak of `collateral damage' is a far cry from acknowledging the blown-off limbs, the punctured eardrums, the shrapnel wounds, and the psychological horror that are caused by heavy bombardment."
Watching TV all day yesterday there was no talk I caught of the blood that will probably run in the streets of Baghdad. And you can bet that, if and when the invasion occurs, we'll all be spared images of the guts and gore that will be spilled.
Tyranny of Words and War