1
   

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 03:47 pm
dlowan, It's because he's a schizo. He has a robe of a christian sheep, but in fact is really a psychotic madman. c.i.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 03:57 pm
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 05:32 pm
Don't forget "horizontally challenged"...

snood, whaddya up to? Shocked Wink
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 06:10 pm
steissd

Those are three interesting choices you've singled out. Each has a decidedly negative component, though each quite different. The first two catch my attention.

"idiot"...I'm not sure who exactly this term might refer to. Would this be people born with very low IQs? Would it include normal individuals such as yourself who have suffered trauma to the brain, say, in a car accident? Could you clarify proper referents please.

"prostitute"...would it be your preference to keep this word in the common use? If so, why?

sozobe
I had an elderly english aunt who some years ago used an expression I'd never heard before to describe a woman whom she thought a tad promiscuous, saying 'she has round heels'.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 06:16 pm
More like "flat" heels. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 07:39 pm
Nuttin', sozobe - I was just flattered when you said you agreed with me, and was trying to get a reaction. I got it. (chalk it up to too much time on my hands)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 09:31 pm
Very Happy

Plus, I just remembered that you'd said the thing about PC and lack of nuanced thought first (though you said it more clearly.) Embarrassed

I've seen "round heels", and always wondered what was up with that. I probably will regret asking, but...
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 09:35 pm
Picture the one with round heels having a mattress attached to her back.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 09:39 pm
I got that, yeah, but wondering where the round-heeled-ness comes in.

Ah, checked it out on the web:

Quote:
"Roundheeled" is describes a sexual pushover whose
"roundheels" allow her (yes, sexist etymology) to easily
fall backwards into bed.


http://www.politechbot.com/p-03234.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 10:44 pm
sozobe

Yes, that's it. I'd never heard it either. I think it's a lovely term.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 11:12 pm
Okay, babe, are you wearing round heels? Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 11:13 pm
Oh, you know, soz. If you do a lot of walking, the trailing edge of your heels wear out the quickest, and they wear round. Think streetwalker here.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Feb, 2003 11:23 pm
No such thing as political incorrectness IMO. Not in a democracy. There are a lot of people, though, who reject intellectual and political independence of thought as though they'd be sent away from the table. One of the great privileges and joys of living in a free country is that you can be a contrarian. Fearlessly. Just do it. Stare oddly at Republican women who wear pearls and drive Excusions. Say fearlessly to your post-'60's friends that you think lentils and Jung are really boring. Subscribe to Mad magazine and Foreign Affairs. Buy a Harley but walk to work. Stir things up on an hourly basis. Please. For the sake of us all!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Feb, 2003 09:52 pm
I believe that all who go around with those two words on their lips will get lockjaw and at the same time their brain implode. Sweet silence.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Feb, 2003 10:20 pm
Tartarin

That's lovely. A credo to fight for.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2003 10:29 am
PC language and the pending invasion (alas, it's all I can think about, this confounded "war"):

Language "helps to create a climate in which the need for military action appears to be self-evident," the editors write in their introduction to Collateral Language: A User's Guide To America's New War (NYU Press). "Almost immediately after Sept. 11, supposedly `objective' journalists were echoing politicians and pundits by saying `The United States has no choice but to respond,' thereby giving the subsequent war an aura of inevitability.''

And in so doing, the media, which give more of a platform to military experts than to voices of protest, obscure the true impact on human beings who are the "collateral damage'' in "precision air strikes'' or "targeted killings.''

As the editors point out: "To speak of `collateral damage' is a far cry from acknowledging the blown-off limbs, the punctured eardrums, the shrapnel wounds, and the psychological horror that are caused by heavy bombardment."

Watching TV all day yesterday there was no talk I caught of the blood that will probably run in the streets of Baghdad. And you can bet that, if and when the invasion occurs, we'll all be spared images of the guts and gore that will be spilled.

Tyranny of Words and War
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2003 11:51 am
PDid, I see it as the biggest sin GWBush, who professes to be a christian can do; kill innocent men, women, and children for "any" reason. c.i.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2003 12:49 pm
War should be the last, not the first, option for civilized people.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2003 08:22 pm
steissd,

I support what some people call PC but the silly terms to me don't represent PC, they represent idiocy. But they are fun to pick on.

"full time outdoorsman" - homeless

"non conventional commuter" - carjacker

And for prostitute, he he, - "receiver of swollen goods"
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2003 08:26 pm
manure transdisposer
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 09:16:42