strange phenomenon about litters in words

I thought we'd been subconsciously trained by typos.

Re: strange phenomenon about litters in words


turly hpoe fro teh dlysecix ni lal fo su...

And willow has just exemplified the necessity of keeping the first and last letters in order!

And what about words like "form" and "from?"

Also, some folks with organic brain damage can have trouble with "closure." That is, if a w rd is mis ing a let er, they hav trouble fill ng in the g p.

At school many years ago I developed a personal shorthand for quick note-taking by omitting vowels except at either end of words. It worked remarkably well. Or as I might have said, "At schl mny yrs ago I dvlpd a prsnl shrthnd fr qck nte-tkng by omttng vwls excpt at eithr end of wrds. It wrkd rmrkbly wll."

I posted a similar answer in another Q & A forum, and several people commented that they had no trouble deciphering the gibberish.

The only word I didn't understand in the original post was ****. Oh wait, I did. I suppose the theory may also point to how one can learn to speed-read as well. However, it's incredibly annoying to read, and is really only useful as a theory in English (that would be my guess). What if say, in Chinese, they mixed up the characters in a sentence, just for fun? How would that be read and interpereted?

Ewood, I had a similar system myself, but I was the only one reading the stuff. In correspondence with others, I took a different approach. It's not so much a matter of whether or not one can interperet the gibberish, but how it looks professionally.

Mind you, I do like the concept of "litters in words". I have a picture of words giving birth to multiple wordlets.