1
   

Backlog Blocks Immigrants Hoping to Vote

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 09:29 am
The administration speaks of spreading democracy as well as the right to vote throughout the world. However, they seem to have forgotten that principle right here in the US. The problem as always is reduced to shortage of personnel due to lack of sufficient funding. We have funds for tax give breaks and funds for pork galore but not enough funds to assure our new citizens the right to vote. Is this administration the pot that is calling the kettle black?


Backlog Blocks Immigrants Hoping to Vote

By NINA BERNSTEIN

Published: October 15, 2004

early half of the 126,000 immigrants in New York State who have applied to become American citizens have lost their chance to vote in the presidential election because of processing backlogs in the federal Department of Homeland Security, according to a new study.

The New York Immigration Coalition, an umbrella group and advocacy arm for more than 150 community organizations serving newcomers, found that about 60,000 prospective citizens in New York were not naturalized in time for last week's state voter registration deadline. The situation is similar, if not as severe, in other states, including several swing states.

"New York is the worst by far," said Margaret McHugh, director of the coalition. "But the numbers in some battleground states are startling. This has a potential impact on the election."

In Florida, where the margin of victory in the 2000 presidential election was 537 votes, an estimated 25,000 new citizens would be eligible to vote if they had been naturalized within the six months set as a national standard by President Bush, the coalition calculated. Instead, the Miami office of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, now part of the Homeland Security Department - has a 21-month backlog.

In New Jersey, backlogs have shut out about 12,000 immigrants from voting, the analysis found, and in Arizona, where processing now takes 13 months, about 6,500 would-be citizens were unable to vote.

The analysis used government figures for the number of pending cases, along with an average approval rate of 75 percent. It applied the difference between actual processing times and the six-month standard to estimate how many would have become citizens before voter registration deadlines had the standard been met. It concluded that New York had more would-be citizens shut out of the election than any other state.

Even some who finally reached citizenship last week, after long delays, discovered that they were not in time, said Vladimir Epshteyn, president of the Russian-American Voters Educational League. He told how an elderly Brooklyn man rushed to him for help filling out a voter registration card a few days ago. The Brooklyn man and his wife had applied for citizenship at the same time, but for reasons that were never clear, his application was delayed for more than a year and a half after hers was granted, Mr. Epshteyn said.

"I had to tell him it was too late," Mr. Epshteyn said. "He was so disappointed - even, I would say, depressed."

Many factors contribute to delays in naturalization. Among those cited by the coalition is a shortage of staff members to handle multiple security checks required for every applicant. Each applicant must pass through at least three layers of security checks, including an Interagency Border Information System database known as IBIS; an F.B.I. fingerprint check, which is valid for only 15 months; and an F.B.I. name check.

According to the coalition, immigration officials say the F.B.I. takes a long time to respond to name checks. "This is dragging out the processing times for every type of application," the coalition paper said.

Christopher Bentley, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the agency was on track to reach the six-month processing goal in a little over two years.

"We certainly acknowledge that there is a backlog right now and it is a backlog that we are determined to eliminate by the end of 2006," he said yesterday. "Our commitment is to getting citizenship and the right to vote to eligible candidates as quickly as possible. We're making steady progress, but we're obviously not there yet."

But the coalition said chronic understaffing makes progress unlikely. "Unless Immigration Services offices receive the staff and funding that they realistically need," the study concluded, "there is little chance that naturalization and other immigration services will improve anytime soon."

Even as the backlog of cases grew, the number of immigrants sworn in as citizens nationwide declined by 19 percent in the 2003 fiscal year, to 463,204, from 573,708 in 2002, according to the latest government figures.

One reason backlogs worsened in 2003, the coalition said, was that agents responsible for handling naturalizations were temporarily reassigned to carry out the Homeland Security Department's so-called "special registration" program, which involved the fingerprinting, photographing and interrogating more than 83,000 immigrants from predominantly Arab and Muslim countries. The program was suspended after it proved all but useless in finding terrorists.

At the Immigration Coalition, Ms. McHugh said the sense of bitterness and disappointment among many citizens-in-waiting was palpable.

"They feel their voices have been silenced and their votes have been robbed, even though it could well determine the outcome of the election," she said. "They all take it seriously that they now live in a democracy. Unfortunately the government has not taken seriously the obligation to include them
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 751 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 09:50 am
Block the Vote
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: October 15, 2004


Earlier this week former employees of Sproul & Associates (operating under the name Voters Outreach of America), a firm hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters, told a Nevada TV station that their supervisors systematically tore up Democratic registrations.

The accusations are backed by physical evidence and appear credible. Officials have begun a criminal investigation into reports of similar actions by Sproul in Oregon.

Republicans claim, of course, that they did nothing wrong - and that besides, Democrats do it, too. But there haven't been any comparably credible accusations against Democratic voter-registration organizations. And there is a pattern of Republican efforts to disenfranchise Democrats, by any means possible.

Some of these, like the actions reported in Nevada, involve dirty tricks. For example, in 2002 the Republican Party in New Hampshire hired an Idaho company to paralyze Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts by jamming the party's phone banks.

But many efforts involve the abuse of power. For example, Ohio's secretary of state, a Republican, tried to use an archaic rule about paper quality to invalidate thousands of new, heavily Democratic registrations.

That attempt failed. But in Wisconsin, a Republican county executive insists that this year, when everyone expects a record turnout, Milwaukee will receive fewer ballots than it got in 2000 or 2002 - a recipe for chaos at polling places serving urban, mainly Democratic voters.

And Florida is the site of naked efforts to suppress Democratic votes, and the votes of blacks in particular.

Florida's secretary of state recently ruled that voter registrations would be deemed incomplete if those registering failed to check a box affirming their citizenship, even if they had signed an oath saying the same thing elsewhere on the form. Many counties are, sensibly, ignoring this ruling, but it's apparent that some officials have both used this rule and other technicalities to reject applications as incomplete, and delayed notifying would-be voters of problems with their applications until it was too late.

Whose applications get rejected? A Washington Post examination of rejected applications in Duval County found three times as many were from Democrats, compared with Republicans. It also found a strong tilt toward rejection of blacks' registrations.

The case of Florida's felon list - used by state officials, as in 2000, to try to wrongly disenfranchise thousands of blacks - has been widely reported. Less widely reported has been overwhelming evidence that the errors were deliberate.

In an article coming next week in Harper's, Greg Palast, who originally reported the story of the 2000 felon list, reveals that few of those wrongly purged from the voting rolls in 2000 are back on the voter lists. State officials have imposed Kafkaesque hurdles for voters trying to get back on the rolls. Depending on the county, those attempting to get their votes back have been required to seek clemency for crimes committed by others, or to go through quasi-judicial proceedings to prove that they are not felons with similar names.

And officials appear to be doing their best to make voting difficult for those blacks who do manage to register. Florida law requires local election officials to provide polling places where voters can cast early ballots. Duval County is providing only one such location, when other counties with similar voting populations are providing multiple sites. And in Duval and other counties the early voting sites are miles away from precincts with black majorities.

Next week, I'll address the question of whether the votes of Floridians with the wrong color skin will be fully counted if they are cast. Mr. Palast notes that in the 2000 election, almost 180,000 Florida votes were rejected because they were either blank or contained overvotes. Demographers from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission estimate that 54 percent of the spoiled ballots were cast by blacks. And there's strong evidence that this spoilage didn't reflect voters' incompetence: it was caused mainly by defective voting machines and may also reflect deliberate vote-tampering.

The important point to realize is that these abuses aren't aberrations. They're the inevitable result of a Republican Party culture in which dirty tricks that distort the vote are rewarded, not punished. It's a culture that will persist until voters - whose will still does count, if expressed strongly enough - hold that party accountable.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Oct, 2004 09:52 am
mopst of these immigrants probably vote democrat...enough said
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Oct, 2004 11:38 am
An example of the efficiency of our voting system. I spoke with my elder son who has been living in Europe for over 10 years. He said he had requested an absentee ballot over two months ago and never received it. I am sure at this point he never will.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Backlog Blocks Immigrants Hoping to Vote
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 02:24:58