1
   

Bush Flips Out

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 11:52 am
As the coalition partners of the willing disappears...
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 11:55 am
More like the coaltion of the disappearing...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 12:01 pm
It seems those disappearing countries are in tune to the realities as detailed in this article. Only the repubs in this country continue to follow the party line. Kinda sad, really.
**********************************
A president who spends too much time spinning webs
of illusion can find himself trapped in them.
Webs of Illusion

October 11, 2004
By BOB HERBERT

It's understood that incumbents campaigning for re-election
will spotlight the good news and downplay the bad. The
problem for President Bush, with the election just three
weeks away, is that the bad news keeps cascading in and
there is very little good news to tout.

So the president and his chief supporters have resorted to
the odd tactic of claiming that the bad news is good.

The double talk reached a fever pitch last week after the
release of two devastating reports - the comprehensive
report by Charles Duelfer, the chief U.S. weapons
inspector, which destroyed any remaining doubts that Iraq
had weapons of mass destruction; and the Labor Department's
dismal employment report for September, which heightened
concerns about the strength of the economic recovery and
left Mr. Bush with the dubious distinction of being the
first president since Herbert Hoover to stand for
re-election with fewer people working than at the beginning
of his term.

Mr. Bush turned the findings of the Duelfer report upside
down and inside out, telling crowds at campaign rallies
that it proved Saddam Hussein had been "a gathering
threat." It didn't matter that the report, ordered by the
president himself, showed just the opposite. The truth
would not have been helpful to the president. So with a
brazenness and sleight of hand usually associated with
three-card-monte players, he pulled a fast one on his
cheering listeners.

Vice President Cheney had an equally peculiar response to
the report, which said Iraq had destroyed its illicit
weapons stockpiles in the early 1990's. Referring to the
president's decision to launch the war, Mr. Cheney said,
"To delay, defer, wait wasn't an option."

The September jobs report, released on the same day as Mr.
Bush's second debate with Senator John Kerry, was deeply
disappointing to the White House. Just 96,000 jobs were
created, not even enough to keep up with the monthly
expansion of the working-age population.

The somber findings forced the president's spin machine
into overdrive. Reality, once again, was shoved aside. The
administration's upbeat public response to the Labor
Department report was described in The Times as follows:
"The White House hailed it as evidence of continued
employment expansion, saying that it validated Mr. Bush's
strategy of pursuing tax cuts to support a recovery from
the 2001 economic downturn."

In the president's parallel universe, things are always
fine.

Mr. Bush sold his tax cuts as a mighty force for job
creation. They weren't. The Times article that reported the
sunny White House response to the disappointing job
creation figures also said: "In September, an estimated
62.3 percent of the working-age population was employed,
two full percentage points below the level at the beginning
of the recession in March 2001. That difference represents
over 4.5 million people without work."

Hyperbole is part of every politician's portfolio. But on
the most serious matters facing the country, Mr. Bush's
administration has often gone beyond hyperbole to
deliberate misrepresentations that undermine the very idea
of an informed electorate. If unpleasant realities are not
acknowledged by the officials occupying the highest offices
in the land, there is no chance that the full resources of
the government and the people will be marshaled to meet
those challenges.

The president continues to behave as if he's in denial
about the war. Iraq remains a tragic mess and the
electorate needs to know that.

In yesterday's Week in Review section, The Times's Dexter
Filkins wrote movingly from Baghdad about the reporters
trying to cover the war. There's been a relentless
expansion, he said, of areas that reporters dare not
venture into because they are too dangerous. Most European
reporters have left the country, and there are far fewer
Americans than just a few months ago.

Forty-six reporters have been killed and Mr. Filkins
himself has been attacked by a mob, shot at and detained by
the Mahdi Army.

If Mr. Bush has a plan to clean up the mess in Iraq, he
should say so. If he has a strategy - besides more tax cuts
- to bolster employment in the U.S., he should tell us. If
he's in touch with the real world in which these and other
very serious problems exist, he might consider letting us
know.

Spinning gets old after a while. A president who spends too
much time spinning webs of illusion can find himself
trapped in them.

E-mail: [email protected]

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 12:28 pm
The emperor has no clothes.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 12:52 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
More like the coaltion of the disappearing...


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 12:58 pm
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
More like the coaltion of the disappearing...


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Why so happy about that?
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:00 pm
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-na-sinclair9oct09,1,4817545.story?coll=la-home-headlines

NEW YORK ?- The conservative-leaning Sinclair Broadcast Group, whose television outlets reach nearly a quarter of the nation's homes with TV, is ordering its stations to preempt regular programming just days before the Nov. 2 election to air a film that attacks Sen. John F. Kerry's activism against the Vietnam War, network and station executives familiar with the plan said Friday.

Sinclair's programming plan, communicated to executives in recent days and coming in the thick of a close and intense presidential race, is highly unusual even in a political season that has been marked by media controversies.

Sinclair has told its stations ?- many of them in political swing states such as Ohio and Florida ?- to air "Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal," sources said. The film, funded by Pennsylvania veterans and produced by a veteran and former Washington Times reporter, features former POWs accusing Kerry ?- a decorated Navy veteran turned war protester ?- of worsening their ordeal by prolonging the war. Sinclair will preempt regular prime-time programming from the networks to show the film, which may be classified as news programming, according to TV executives familiar with the plan.

Executives at Sinclair did not return calls seeking comment, but the Kerry campaign accused the company of pressuring its stations to influence the political process.

"It's not the American way for powerful corporations to strong-arm local broadcasters to air lies promoting a political agenda," said David Wade, a spokesman for the Democratic nominee's campaign. "It's beyond yellow journalism; it's a smear bankrolled by Republican money, and I don't think Americans will stand for it."

Sinclair stations are spread throughout the country, in major markets that include Baltimore, Pittsburgh and Las Vegas; its only California station is in Sacramento. Fourteen of the 62 stations the company either owns or programs are in the key political swing states of Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where the presidential election is being closely fought.

Station and network sources said they have been told the Sinclair stations ?- which include affiliates of Fox, ABC, CBS, NBC, as well as WB and UPN ?- will be preempting regular programming for one hour between Oct. 21 and Oct. 24, depending on the city. The airing of "Stolen Honor" will be followed by a panel discussion, which Kerry will be asked to join, thus potentially satisfying fairness regulations, the sources said.

Kerry campaign officials said they had been unaware of Sinclair's plans to air the film, and said Kerry had not received an invitation to appear.

No one familiar with the plan was willing to criticize it publicly, some because they said they don't know all the details of what Sinclair plans for the panel that follows. But a number of people privately expressed outrage at the seemingly overt nature of the political attack, which comes during a tight election and at a time when the media are under assault as never before. Cable's Fox News Channel was attacked in the summer by a coalition of liberal groups for what they said were its efforts to boost Republicans; in recent weeks, CBS' Dan Rather has been criticized by conservatives, as well as some nonpartisan journalists, for a "60 Minutes" broadcast that used now-discredited documents in a report saying President Bush received favorable treatment when in the Texas Air National Guard in the 1970s.

Democrats have for some time accused Sinclair, a publicly traded company based in Maryland, of a having a right-wing agenda.

The company made headlines in April when it ordered seven of its stations not to air Ted Koppel's "Nightline" roll call of military dead in Iraq, deeming it a political statement "disguised as news content." Sen. John McCain, the Republican from Arizona who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, was among those who criticized Sinclair's decision not to air the "Nightline" program, which featured the names and pictures of more than 700 U.S. troops.

Even before the "Nightline" controversy, Sinclair drew criticism because of the combination of its highly centralized news operations, which often include conservative commentary, and its almost exclusively Republican political giving. In the 2004 political cycle, Sinclair executives have given nearly $68,000 in political contributions, 97% to Republicans, ranking it 12th among top radio and TV station group contributors, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a campaign finance watchdog group.

The upcoming "Stolen Honor" will probably bring fresh attention to Sinclair. "I can't think of a precedent of holding up programming to show a political documentary at a point where it would have the maximum effect on the vote," said Jay Rosen, chairman of New York University's journalism department. But the program will only be the latest in a string of politically charged media events in this campaign. Representatives of Michael Moore's anti-Bush "Fahrenheit 9/11," which has grossed $214 million worldwide, are in talks for a deal to make the film available on pay-per-view cable the night before the election. The Sundance Channel plans to air live clips Monday from the anti-Bush "Vote for Change" rock concert.

Cable, however, doesn't have the reach of broadcast stations like Sinclair's, nor is it subject to the same federal regulations. Still, although broadcast stations are required to provide equal time to major candidates in an election campaign, the Sinclair move may not run afoul of those provisions if Kerry or a representative is offered time to respond. Moreover, several sources said Sinclair had told them it planned to classify the program as news, where the rules don't apply.

Calling it news, however, poses its own problems, said Keith Woods, dean of the faculty at the Poynter Institute, a journalism school in St. Petersburg, Fla., that teaches professional ethics. "To air a documentary intended to provide a one-sided view of Kerry's record and call it news ?- it's like calling Michael Moore's movie news," he said, adding that the closer to an election that a controversial news report is aired, the "higher the bar has to go" in terms of fairness.

Clearly, Sinclair's reach will bring a much wider audience to the film. The 42-minute film has only been available on DVD or for $4.99 through an Internet download, although fans had been mounting an Internet campaign to get it wider exposure.

"Stolen Honor" was made by Carlton Sherwood, a Vietnam veteran and former reporter for the conservative Washington Times who is also the author of a book about the Rev. Sun Myung Moon. On the website for the film, he tells viewers, "Intended or not, Lt. Kerry painted a depraved portrait of Vietnam veterans, literally creating the images of those who served in combat as deranged drug-addicted psychopaths, baby killers" that endured for 30 years in the popular culture.

Sherwood did not return calls seeking comment.


Some fun facts on SBG:

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=63020#1

I wonder...how would neoconservatives react if Michael Moore had his film, Farenheit 9/11, broadcasted on 1/4 of America's televisions via a huge corporate media's myriad affiliates and outlets, and called it news to avoid Federal Election Laws?

Just curious...
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:01 pm
Sorry about that. I was trying to start a new thread. I'm not exactly sure what happened...
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:03 pm
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."

What a great Constitution we have that protects freedom of the press.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:10 pm
You're saying the 1st amendment protects propaganda?
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:22 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
You're saying the 1st amendment protects propaganda?


Of course it does. If it didn't, F911 would have been declared unconstitutional.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:22 pm
Quote, "Why so happy about that?" It shows what a liar and ineffectual this president and company are, because more countries are realizing they've been lied to. People and countries do not follow liars willingly.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:22 pm
Larry434 wrote:
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
More like the coaltion of the disappearing...


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Why so happy about that?


don't confuse appreciation for a clever remark as happiness over the situation.

i want the stabilization of iraq to succeed. then we can get our guys the hell out of there.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:24 pm
Coalition built on lies should never work; if we were in the same boat as they, I'd support a pullout from the coalition too. Attacking any country on lies should not have any support.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 01:26 pm
Larry434 wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
You're saying the 1st amendment protects propaganda?


Of course it does. If it didn't, F911 would have been declared unconstitutional.


Except that you have to pay to see F911 and it isn't broadcast over the airwaves -- interrupting prime time television.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 02:43 pm
It's only Propaganda when "they" do it!
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 02:45 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Larry434 wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
You're saying the 1st amendment protects propaganda?


Of course it does. If it didn't, F911 would have been declared unconstitutional.


Except that you have to pay to see F911 and it isn't broadcast over the airwaves -- interrupting prime time television.
[/b]

agreed.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 02:49 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Larry434 wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
You're saying the 1st amendment protects propaganda?


Of course it does. If it didn't, F911 would have been declared unconstitutional.


Except that you have to pay to see F911 and it isn't broadcast over the airwaves -- interrupting prime time television.


No one is compelled to watch either of them.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 02:50 pm
The airwaves are public.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 03:03 pm
Quote:
No one is compelled to watch either of them.


Bullshit, Larry434. Sinclair Broadcasting Group is demanding that their affiliates interrupt their regular scheduling to play this. So, in essence, these affiliates are being COMPELLED to do just that. And they are specifically trying to present it as a news story in order to avoid the McCain-Feingold laws. There are many rural families in swingstates who will crack another beer, pull up the blanket, and watch this character assassination of Kerry. They will advertise this in advance, and entice their base viewership to watch FOR FREE.

HBO can't "compel" you to watch Farenheit 9/11 if you refuse to pay, unless YOU actually feel "compelled" to pony up the cash and watch Michael's film.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Flips Out
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/10/2026 at 11:44:00