1
   

The press once again proves it's bias

 
 
Fedral
 
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 11:47 am
The 'Alphabet Networks' have once again proven their bias by lowering the verification standards for stories involving Republicans to the point at which they will believe and report anything as long as it hurts the Right.

Well, the chickens have come home to roost on this story, or to use another metaphor ...

This one bit them right in the az$:

CBS: Bush documents can't be verified
'We shouldn't have used them,' executive states MSNBC staff and news service reports
Updated: 12:59 p.m. ET Sept. 20, 2004

NEW YORK - CBS on Monday said it cannot vouch for the authenticity of documents used to support a "60 Minutes" story about President Bush's Vietnam-era National Guard service after several experts denounced them as fakes.
The network said that while it was "deliberately misled," it was wrong to go on the air with a story that it could not substantiate.

"Based on what we know now, CBS News can't prove the documents are authentic," CBS President Andrew Heyward said in a statement. "We shouldn't have used them. That was a mistake, which we deeply regret. Nothing is more important to us than our credibility and keeping faith with the millions of people who count on us for fair, accurate, reliable and independent reporting. We will continue to work tirelessly to be worthy of that trust."

'Full confidence' initially
The statement began with this explanation of events:

"'60 Minutes Wednesday' had full confidence in the original report or it would not have aired. However, in the wake of serious and disturbing questions that came up after the broadcast, CBS News has done extensive additional reporting in an effort to confirm the documents' authenticity. That included an interview featured on last week's edition of '60 Minutes Wednesday' with Marian Carr Knox, secretary to the late Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, the officer named as the author of the documents; the interview with Bill Burkett to be seen tonight; and a further review of the forensic evidence on both sides of the debate."

CBS said Burkett, a retired National Guard lieutenant colonel, had provided the documents. In a press release accompanying Heyward's statement, CBS said that Burkett "also admits that he deliberately misled the CBS News producer working on the report, giving her a false account of the documents' origins to protect a promise of confidentiality to the actual source."

The documents were said to be written by Killian, indicating he was being pressured to "sugarcoat" the performance ratings of a young Bush, then the son of a Texas congressman, and that Bush failed to follow orders to take a physical. Killian died in 1984.

Rather issues own statementThe Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6055248/?gt1=5100
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 763 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 11:50 am
Please.

The media is incredibly soft on Bush. He NEVER has to answer direct questions about what he has done. Ever. He is completely insulated from reality in the white house.

And with Fox News acting as the republican propaganda channel (I watched a few days ago, and what did they talk about? Kerry, and how bad he was, for hours and hours), it's hard to crow about how biased the media is against Bush...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 11:52 am
I guess those who against the network news will see as a deliberate hoax on the part of CBS who when looking like he was going to get caught fessed up.

Dan Rather is obviously a liberal so he probably was glad to get such a story handed to him. However I seriously doubt any news caster will run a story that they knew was made up, their reputation is on the line and they know it.
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 11:56 am
Fox news is as biased to the right as the 'Alphabet Networks' (ABC,CBS,NBC) are to the left.

At least Fox invites Liberals to its point/counterpoint type shows ...

When was the last time you saw a real conservative asked to join a discussion in network primetime.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:00 pm
"...a REAL Conservative"?

By whose definition?

Does he have to actually WEAR and DISPLAY a SWASTIKA to signify?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:03 pm
Does Bob (the sleeze) Novak count. I see him most every day on the "Liberal" media.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:06 pm
When was the last time you saw a real conservative asked to join a discussion in network primetime. <---

The last one? Zell Miller. And look how well that went.

As for a discussion of the slant of the media, I would point everyone to:
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/35667#736290

Where an excellent rundown of the media bias is given; it's been consistently slanted right since the 30's. One of my favorites (and this one's especially for you, Federal):

Quote:
A study of ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News in the year 2001 shows that 92 percent of all U.S. sources interviewed were white, 85 percent were male and, where party affiliation was identifiable, 75 percent were Republican. "


Seems there are more white male republicans on the alphabet networks than anything else, by far. Which directly contradicts your claims, Federal.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:15 pm
From everything I've read it seems that these documents were passed around the White House before the story ever ran and not one person, not even Bush himself, questioned their authenticity.

Which makes it very hard for me to shake the image of Karl Rove giggling his ass off over having engineered another fun little prank.
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:41 pm
I point you to a wonderful article posted by Foxfyre:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=34383
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 12:59 pm
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 01:41 pm
Fedral wrote:
I point you to a wonderful article posted by Foxfyre:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=34383


That article only states that an opinion poll seems to indicate that people perceive the networks as biased.
0 Replies
 
Magus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 01:42 pm
Out of over 300 million inhabitants there are BOUND to be a few individuals who see things from a skewed perspective.
Quoting them alll together in one post does NOT mean that their skewed perspective is accurate... it just proves that they have peers.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Sep, 2004 01:43 pm
Not to mention over half of those quotes are from the early 90s. Only two are recent, and they are admissions of personal bias and not bias in reporting.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The press once again proves it's bias
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/01/2025 at 06:20:36