1
   

Scientists Question Bush Panel Appointments

 
 
Reply Sat 25 Jan, 2003 08:41 pm
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A growing number of scientists say President Bush administration is distorting the scientific advisory process by appointing conservative ideologues to panels that are supposed to be impartial.
They fear the appointments are politically motivated and meant to delay decision-making affecting controversial areas such as the environment, abortion and workplace safety. "Science policy that affects public health should be above party politics, and seen to be so," the Lancet, one of the world's leading medical journals, said in an editorial. "Expert committees need to be filled, by definition, with experts." Some of the controversial appointees have been evangelical Christians, but the Lancet said religion was not the issue. "This is not to decry faith in medicine; the perfect role model is C. Everett Koop, U.S. surgeon-general (from) 1981 to 1989, a devout Christian, and who maintained credibility by remaining impartial, especially in sensitive areas such as women's health and AIDS," it said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=585&ncid=585&e=2&u=/nm/20030124/sc_nm/science_panels_dc_2
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,772 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jan, 2003 08:45 pm
I am not at all surprised to learn this. Pol Pot murdered the intellectuals - Bush just wants them to step aside. Same result over the long haul.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Jan, 2003 09:25 pm
Nor am I surprised, thanks to the scientists who spoke up.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 09:35 am
Why would research scientists want to upset President Bush, when he could easily cut funds to the NIH?

Not nice! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 09:42 am
because they would prefer hard science to "faith healing"
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 09:46 am
However>>>>>>The NIH supports Alternative Medicine. Cool
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 09:47 am
Because that thread of thought, New Haven, is what has made up this rickety administration to begin with. Sometimes it's not about the money.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 09:53 am
bbbbbbb
Holistic medicine is very much alive and well today! Razz
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 10:05 am
when Bush has a nomination for the Presidential Council on HIV who opines that HIV is a "gay plague" he is probably not interested in science/health. (see Jerry Thacker)
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 10:11 am
Dys - the guy also called it the gay deathstyle.... what an ass.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 10:32 am
If we are to remove politics from the entire health debate then the first thing that has to be done is the removal of anyone that is a member of the American Medical Association which means the removal of anyone that is a Medical doctor. The AMA itself is knee deep in politics.

Who puts out "Lancet" btw?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 10:37 am
No doctors involved in the debate on health care?

That's practical.

I believe probably the premise is flawed; that one presumes one can remove politics from the equation.

Why don't you simply remove all people from the process...that'll get rid of the politics... :wink:
0 Replies
 
flyboy804
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2003 10:47 am
The "Lancet" is the British equivalent of "JAMA". I don't know the specific British organization involved.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Scientists Question Bush Panel Appointments
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 04:43:53