5
   

Hillary the prostitute, Pay to Play

 
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 06:09 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Since you care about people, how have you helped those folks?


I haven't yet. I am still studying to find out the best method and I have to say so far I have much concern if I will be of any help at all.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 06:16 pm
@reasoning logic,
Thanks for your honesty. I have found Second Harvest Food Bank and Habitat for Humanity to be two good charities. They help everybody regardless of race, religion, or anything else, and most of the money goes towards the cause.

I think most Second Harvest Food Banks are rated the same or close to it.
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=4455

Habitat for Humanity:
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=3789
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 06:31 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Thanks for your honesty. I have found Second Harvest Food Bank and Habitat for Humanity to be two good charities.


I have seen them at work and they do seem to be busy people.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 09:03 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Habitat for Humanity:


But, but isent that crooked president Carter involved with that organization?
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 09:12 pm
@RABEL222,
I assume you're joking. I thought he was a poor president, but never crooked. Matter of fact, as an ex president, he might be the best we've ever had.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 09:20 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:
The article is egregiously inaccurate in these key respects:

1. Congressman Michael McCaul (R-TX), who appears in the video above, is not the "Department of Homeland Security chairman" (there is no such entity). McCaul is the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security.

2. While McCaul did state in the video that in his opinion Hillary Clinton is guilty of "treason" for using a private e-mail server while Secretary of State, he did not announce an indictment — nor, indeed, would he have the judicial power, as a Congressman, to secure such an indictment — against Clinton.

3. As we know from Bret Baier's own corrections, it is not the case that any government entity has said an indictment of Clinton is likely, much less that an indictment has already gone forward.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: 04 November 2016
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Nov, 2016 09:36 pm
@roger,
YEP!!!
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 5 Nov, 2016 06:31 am
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/18/2019 at 05:24:34