1
   

I'm seeing RED!

 
 
Fedral
 
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 07:24 am
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 891 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 07:54 am
I see maps like that and I am reminded of why I like the electoral college so much.

Our founding fathers were freakin' geniuses!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 07:56 am
It's wonderful to see a non-partisan, fair and balanced report such as that . . .
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:00 am
Setanta wrote:
It's wonderful to see a non-partisan, fair and balanced report such as that . . .


Isn't it!!! Fun, too! Smile Smile Smile
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:01 am
Irony is lost on you, huh, Boss?
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:27 am
Only your particular brand. Smile Smile Smile

(And, not so much lost as...ignored)
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 08:56 am
Setanta wrote:
It's wonderful to see a non-partisan, fair and balanced report such as that . . .


I see how your mind works Setana:

(A little child runs up to you)

Child: Setana, Setana, look at the pretty map. It shows all the electoral map and what states are showing leanings toward whom. It also shows poll numbers and verifiable sources for each of those poll numbers.

Setana: Tskk, tskk my child, don't you know Republican propoganda when you see it little one... electoral maps and polls are only accurate when they show Democrats ahead.

_____________________________________________________________

(Little child runs back to you)

Child: Setana, Setana, look in the paper. It says here that Kitty Kelley's new book is full of unconfirmable stories and the 'sources' she claims to have used have all denied that they ever told her those things. It also says here that CBS's document analysts claim that they told the network that the Bush memo was 'of doubtful authenticity' and the network used it anyway.

Setana: Tskk, tskk my child, don't you understand that we are dealing with FACTS here. Even if there is no verifiable source, if it is in any way, anti-Republican, it MUST be true.

Shocked Rolling Eyes


Such is the state of your Party...
0 Replies
 
padmasambava
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 10:31 am
The only fact of interest from here on down the line will be the actual election results.

Until the returns are all in - all else is mere posturing.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 10:35 am
I am not a member of the Democratic party. My name is spelled S-e-t-a-n-t-a. The sources alluded to are as biased as the site itself.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 10:36 am
By the by, Fedral, imputations of beliefs to others absent any certain knowledge of what others believe just makes you look more the fool . . .
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Sep, 2004 10:37 am
Federal
Federal, the remedy to why you are seeing red:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=33827&highlight=

BBB
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » I'm seeing RED!
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2025 at 03:28:28