1
   

Journalists Covering Presidential Debates Are Asked for Race

 
 
Reply Fri 10 Sep, 2004 10:26 am
Journalists requesting credentials for the presidential debate scheduled for Oct. 8 at Washington University are being asked to disclose their race on the media application.

John Butler, news director at KMOX (1120 AM), said he found the question offensive. "Here's the deal: It's not their damn business," he said. "We're journalists, period. We're not white, black, green, purple, male or female. End of story."

Quote:
Journalists covering debates are asked for racial data
By EUN-KYUNG KIM
Of the Post-Dispatch
09/08/2004

Journalists requesting credentials for the presidential debate scheduled for Oct. 8 at Washington University are being asked to disclose their race on the media application.

The question surprised several local editors and news directors, eliciting prickly responses from some and recalling for others a flare-up over the race of an Arizona photographer scheduled to cover a visit by the vice president.

Requests for racial information have not been part of the standard questions posed to media covering the dozens of campaign visits President George W. Bush or his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, have made to Missouri recently.

John Butler, news director at KMOX (1120 AM), said he found the question offensive.

"Here's the deal: It's not their damn business," he said. "We're journalists, period. We're not white, black, green, purple, male or female. End of story."

Media applying for credentials to the presidential debates fill out their requests online. The application, distributed by the Commission on Presidential Debates, asks the applicant for a photo and a Social Security number or, if the journalist is not a U.S. resident, a passport number. It also asks for gender, a current address and the city, state and country of birth. The application gives the option of declining to provide race information.

The race of journalists became a national issue more than a month ago when an Arizona Daily Star photographer, Mamta Popat, appeared to be singled out for additional scrutiny by the Bush campaign.

Campaign officials called the woman's office the day before a rally featuring Vice President Dick Cheney in Tucson to ask about Popat's race. The paper's managing editor challenged the question's relevance and was told that Popat, who is of Indian descent, might be denied access to the event. The campaign later contacted the editor to say the photographer's credentials had been cleared.

A Bush-Cheney spokesman said Wednesday it was not the campaign's policy to require racial information. A Kerry campaign spokesman said its campaign refers all security issues to the U.S. Secret Service.

Janet Brown, executive director of the Commission on Presidential Debates, said the request for racial information was a requirement of the Secret Service, which said it needed the information to conduct full background checks.

Secret Service spokesman Tom Mazur said racial information was among several "law enforcement identifiers used to facilitate national database searches" run through an FBI crime system. Other identifiers include name, date of birth and Social Security number.

Mazur said an applicant's refusal to divulge racial information should not affect his or her chance of getting debate credentials, unless the application is flagged because of other information.

Credentials for the 2000 presidential debates were handled by the Senate Press Gallery. Applications did not ask for race information.

At least 2,500 journalists are expected to attend the presidential debates.

Alvin Reid, city editor at the St. Louis American, said he had no problem being asked racial information, in light of all the additional security measures law enforcement has taken after Sept. 11. "I kind of understand that the face has to match the media credential, has to match the race, and I'm sure, while they didn't ask for your height and weight, that things like that are being screened a lot closer than two or three years ago," he said.
Source
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 694 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
dare2think
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Sep, 2004 04:18 pm
I will love to see the debates, to see bush prancing around like a rooster, and leaning on the podium, he never stands up straight, what is his problem?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Sep, 2004 09:03 pm
My guess, is that they are doing it to make sure there is an even spread of race at the debates. What you don't mind affirmative action when it's for jobs and school, but when it comes to something else it is wrong?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Sep, 2004 10:16 pm
Baldimo wrote:
My guess, is that they are doing it to make sure there is an even spread of race at the debates. What you don't mind affirmative action when it's for jobs and school, but when it comes to something else it is wrong?


The article SAYS why they are doing it Baldimo, and it is nothing to do with affirmative action:

"Janet Brown, executive director of the Commission on Presidential Debates, said the request for racial information was a requirement of the Secret Service, which said it needed the information to conduct full background checks.

Secret Service spokesman Tom Mazur said racial information was among several "law enforcement identifiers used to facilitate national database searches" run through an FBI crime system. Other identifiers include name, date of birth and Social Security number."
0 Replies
 
padmasambava
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Sep, 2004 10:33 pm
"Without regard to race creed or color" is not an ambiguous requirement.

When those in law enforcement do not respect the constitution it smacks of a police state. Those who require answers that they are not entitled to will have their day in court in spite of the fact that they behave as though they controlled all the courts.

In case you haven't noticed the issue of questionnaires and the inappropriateness of these sort of questions is become a big issue that won't disappear. And it shouldn't just because law enforcement claims that race is relevant to profile potential suspects.

The Republicans may control a majorit on the High Court. But even the High Court has to keep out of the daily business of the lower courts unless there is an issue of great import and the buck stops with them.

In this case I doubt it will get so far.

They will change their application form once the objections have been filed. It isn't affirmative action, it's simply none of their GD business to look into the racial background of US citizens because they are reporters.

In these days of rapid assimilation there are too many hybrids to allow for racial profiling beyond a physical description. Isn't that enough?

I'd wager that with all this concern that the questionnaire only has one category for people from Asia: Asians.

That's the problem with Americans. They are too tempted to pigeon hole and paint us all with one brush whenever it is convenient - especially their American neighbor who does not share their views.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Journalists Covering Presidential Debates Are Asked for Race
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:45:45