Nader off the ballot in Florida, for now.

Florida OK's Nader's Name on Election Ballot

Sep 13, 6:34 PM (ET)

By Jim Loney
MIAMI (Reuters) - Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader's name can appear on Florida ballots for the election, despite a court order to the contrary, Florida's elections chief told officials on Monday in a move that could help President Bush in the key swing state.

The Florida Democratic Party reacted with outrage, calling the move "blatant partisan maneuvering" by Gov. Jeb Bush, the president's younger brother, and vowed to fight it.

In a memo to Florida's 67 county supervisors of elections, Division of Elections director Dawn Roberts said the uncertainty of Hurricane Ivan, which could hit parts of the state by week's end, forced her to act.

The action came in an ongoing legal battle over whether Nader should be allowed on the Florida ballot as the Reform Party candidate.

Nader, an independent nominated by the Reform Party, was a presidential candidate in 2000 when Bush won Florida, and the White House, by 537 votes over then-Vice President Al Gore. Analysts said most of the nearly 98,000 votes Nader got in Florida would have gone to Gore had Nader not been on the ballot.

Florida Circuit Court Judge Kevin Davey issued a temporary injunction last week preventing the state from putting Nader on the 2004 ballot, siding with a Democratic challenge that the Reform Party did not qualify as a national party under state law.

A hearing on a permanent injunction is scheduled for Wednesday. But Roberts said Hurricane Ivan, which is headed for Florida's Gulf coast, had raised "a substantial question as to when such a hearing" will be held.

'PARTISAN MANEUVERING'

As a result, she said, Florida's Department of State had filed an appeal against the temporary injunction. The appeal application automatically lifts the injunction, allowing the counties to put Nader's name on overseas absentee ballots, which must be mailed by Saturday.

"I'm in disbelief," said Scott Maddox, chairman of the Florida Democratic Party. "This is blatant partisan maneuvering on the part of Jeb Bush to give his brother a leg up on election day."

"They are trying to get ballots printed with Nader's name on them," said Maddox. "I am astounded that Jeb Bush is willing to defy the judiciary to help his brother."

Maddox said if Nader drew votes away from any candidate it would be Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry.

Gov. Bush said he agreed with Roberts' decision.

"It's up to the judge to determine, based on the law, whether Nader should be on the ballot or not," Bush said. "But while that process goes on, we cannot put ourselves in the position where the ministerial role of the supervisors cannot be fulfilled."

Maddox noted that Tallahassee, the state capital where Davey sits, is not expected to be directly hit by the hurricane. He said the circuit court could hear the case as scheduled on Wednesday and rule immediately.

In addition, the case is before the Florida Supreme Court, which could also rule at any time, he said.

dirty politics put the current guy in the white house.....what's your beef?

with all due respect baldimo when I need or desire your advice I'll ask for it, but I doubt it.

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

with all due respect baldimo when I need or desire your advice I'll ask for it, but I doubt it.

People are still whining over something that happened 4 years ago and are trying to use it in this year's election. Bush won according to the US Constitution. It is the Supreme Law of the land and it was followed. What happened in FL was a state issue and the Supreme Court had no say in a State manner. Bring it up with the State Supreme Court of FL, they are the ones who ruled no more recounts.

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

with all due respect baldimo when I need or desire your advice I'll ask for it, but I doubt it.

People are still whining over something that happened 4 years ago and are trying to use it in this year's election. Bush won according to the US Constitution. It is the Supreme Law of the land and it was followed. What happened in FL was a state issue and the Supreme Court had no say in a State manner. Bring it up with the State Supreme Court of FL, they are the ones who ruled no more recounts.

Baldimo wrote:

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

with all due respect baldimo when I need or desire your advice I'll ask for it, but I doubt it.

People are still whining over something that happened 4 years ago and are trying to use it in this year's election. Bush won according to the US Constitution. It is the Supreme Law of the land and it was followed. What happened in FL was a state issue and the Supreme Court had no say in a State manner. Bring it up with the State Supreme Court of FL, they are the ones who ruled no more recounts.

Were you even here in 2000? It was the highest court in the land that overuled the state supreme court. So everything you just said is backwards including Bush getting elected by the constitution.

Too Bad for Bush. It gives Florida Republicans an alternative.