let's see, a reformed boozing frat boy turned politcal featherweight wages war with the zeal of tyrant...why listen to the voice of the people when he hears the voice of God? other countries hate america? well, that is downright unamerican.
I take exception with his voting record on EVERY SINGLE wildlife and "animal rights" (they have none) issue. Also to EVERY SINGLE gun control issue he's voted on. Not to mention he's obviously anti-business both big and small unless it comes to ethanol. Isn't that a byproduct of the agricultural industry? No conflict of interest there.
http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0421103
cjhsa wrote:10 out of 10 terrorist say, "anybody but Bush".
That is because they want to help get him re-elected. Hell...he's done more to help them than anyone else...so they owe him. And they figure the best way to do it is to tell everyone that they want anyone but Bush.
Bush, unfortunately, is a moron in a position where a moron is not needed.
I would happily vote for Bush if he would first do the following: Get smart, get smarter, finish his military obligation, start considering the welbeing of workers, get a coherent reasonacle foreign affairs policy, get still smarter.
edgarblythe wrote:I would happily vote for Bush if he would first do the following: Get smart, get smarter, finish his military obligation, start considering the welbeing of workers, get a coherent reasonacle foreign affairs policy, get still smarter.
At that point...he'd be almost smart enough for me, Edgar.
ALMOST!
You have to think about the children! If Bush doesn't get re-elected we will have dirty Arabs touching our children. Do you want that? Save our precious blond haired children -- vote for Bush!
Quote:I take exception with his voting record on EVERY SINGLE wildlife and "animal rights" (they have none) issue. Also to EVERY SINGLE gun control issue he's voted on. Not to mention he's obviously anti-business both big and small unless it comes to ethanol. Isn't that a byproduct of the agricultural industry? No conflict of interest there.
Because GUN CONTROL is the biggest issue facing our nation right now. Right.
Not a complicated guy, are ya, cjhsa?
Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn wrote:Because GUN CONTROL is the biggest issue facing our nation right now. Right.
Cycloptichorn
It will be one if Kerry is elected, trust me.
Why would it be? There are much, much bigger problems with our society than gun control...
I know fanatics such as yourself don't think so, but has that really changed in recent history? I mean, to you, gun control is ALWAYS the #1 issue. Ya might want to consider what that implies.
Cycloptichorn
I'd like to tell you personally what it implies but I would lose my A2K license.
Kerry is also on the wrong side of the war in Iraq. He has now flip flopped on the issue so many times that his true colors have been exposed. He's a friggin hippy and he needs to go home to Cambridge and protest something.
BBB
Two ha has for both of you, quite well deserved---even if perverse.
Pithy, even.
One look at Dys will tell you he couldn't possibly be a truck driver. He couldn't slide across the front seat of a truck's cab because his butt is so skinny he would fall between the bucket seats crack. (All of Dys' trucks have luxury bucket seats.)
BBB
Is this the ebonics thread?
cjhsa
cjhsa, did you attend the School of Social Darwinism?
BBB
I would rather vote for someone who would take the fight to the terrorists instead of waiting for them to hit us at home again. Kerry isn't willing to take the steps to protect the US as it should be protected. He would rather seek the permission of the UN and wait for word from his masters in France and Germany.
Does it really matter what the rest of the world thinks at this point? How are they going to help protect the US?
Any idea where those terrorists are that we are supposed to be taking the fight to?
The Darwin award goes to all of you who support terrorists instead of our troops. Bye.
PDiddie, that's not funny you moran!
cjhsa wrote:The Darwin award goes to all of you who support terrorists instead of our troops. Bye.
who might that be? Name one, prove it, or back off.......
