Reply
Sat 2 Jul, 2016 04:37 pm
I believe that any life form's thoughts are why reality exists. Without the thoughts of a mouse, it's plausible that nations wouldn't be able to exist - or is it?
Is the nation dependent on any life form's ability to think?
Agree to the extent that without that meaning there would be no thoughts.
@Leadfoot,
If the meaning is dependent on the ability of the mouse and the homo sapien, but the homo sapien is "meant" to be "more the means" to resolution, is this duplication of need in your opinion separate from the aim of the source of existence, or the aim itself?
@Thomas33,
Quote:is this duplication of need in your opinion separate from the aim of the source of existence, or the aim itself?
Definitely related to the aim if not the aim itself.
@Leadfoot,
I agree.
The thoughts of the mouse being wanted yet the thoughts of the homo sapien being "meant" to be separate must mean the source's aim is to be identical to the difference.
@Leadfoot,
Why do you encourage this?
@snood,
Only as long as I can see a thread of logic. When I lose sight of that, I let it go.
@Thomas33,
Without thought - There is no recognition of life.