0
   

Another Top Ten List - issues NOT being covered in the news

 
 
angie
 
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2004 05:39 pm
.

You may approve of the information given below. You may find it appalling. At the very least, it brings up a different "issue", and that will perhaps be somewhat of a welcome relief. You can only hammer the "war on terror" so much, and there are other things that ought to concern us.


Top Ten Bush Administration Assaults on Women and Families

10. Throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Bush's first choice to head the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Mary Sheila Gall, opposed efforts to regulate baby walkers, baby bath seats, bunk beds, and voted to eliminate the standard for fire-resistant sleepwear during her ten years on the commission (she was appointed by Bush's father). Gall's rationale for putting children at risk? Parents should take more responsibility for protecting their infants. Gall was the first Bush nominee officially rejected by the Senate (notably, when it was under Democratic control).

9. Even more ironic than rain on your wedding day.

Bush chose Nancy Pfotenhauer, president and CEO of the right-wing Independent Women's Forum, to serve on the National Advisory Committee on Violence Against Women. The IWF actively opposed the Violence Against Women Act. According to IWF's web site, "The battered women's movement has outlived its useful beginnings."

8. But women are already 1.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs!

Bush slammed the door shut on the White House Office for Women's Initiatives and Outreach, which worked with women's advocacy groups on public policy and political issues. His 2004 budget eliminated funding for the Women's Educational Equity Act to promote equity for girls and women in education.

7. Juggle this.


Under the guise of helping working families, particularly working mothers, the Bush administration proposed' tHe so~called FariilyTime' Flexibility Act to abolish federally mandated overtlme pay for .. workers. Democrats prevented this bill from coming to the floor, but Bush pushed the new rules through the Department of Labor and said he'd veto any legislation that attempted to block the rule changes.

6. Head Start/False Start

Bush appointed Wade Horn as assistant secretary for family support in the U.S. Health and Human Services Department. As president of the National Fatherhood Institute, Horn said that low-income kids whose parents aren't married should be last in line for Head Start and other benefits. Horn tried to back away from tnese statements at his confirmation hearings. Then, after Horn's appointment, HHS began to offer special services to welfare recipients - if they agree to marry.


5. So now do we need a Department of Homeroom Security?

Secretary of Education Roderick Paige called the National Education Association, which represents teachers across the nation, a "terrorist organization." Paige later said his comment was a bad joke. The union angered Paige by raising concerns about Bush's signature No Child Left Behind Act, which his administration has refused to adequately fund.

4. Did we say medical privacy? We meant medical piracy.

The Bush Department of Justice attempted to subpoena the medical records of women who had abortions, claiming they needed the records in their efforts to defend a challenge to the so-called partial-birth abortion ban, signed by the president last year. The Department of Justice dropped its efforts to collect records after a judge ruled that the action would threaten women's medical privacy, but the DOJ is still pursuing records from other providers.

3. Barefoot,cpregnant, and in sync with their inborn nature.

President Bush chose Leon Kass, MD to head the President's Council of Bioethics. Kass has written, "For the first time in human history, mature women by the tens of thousands live the entire decade of their twenties - their most fertile years - neither in the homes of their fathers nor in the homes of their husbands; unprotected, lonely, and out of sync with their inborn nature."

2. Physician, heal thyself.

In June 2004, Bush re-appointed Dr. W David Hager to the Food and Drug Administration's Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee. Hager has written about Christ's ability to heal women's illnesses and reportedly refused to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women. Hager was the leading force behind the FDA's rejection of over-the-counter sales of emergency contraception, over the overwhelming recommendation of two FDA advisory panels.


1. It'll be a cold day in Miami...


The Senate in July 2004 approved Bush's nomination of James Leon Holmes to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kansas. Bolmes, an anti-Abortion Rights activist, supports a Constitutional amendment to ban all abortions and said that "concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami." Holmes has also spoken out against the separation of church and state, and co-wrote (with his wife) an article proclaiming that, "The wife is to subordinate herself to the husband... and... place herself under the authority of the man." Holmes' views on women's rights can be summed up in his belief that supporting feminism ultimately contributes "to the culture of death."

www.emilyslist.org
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,679 • Replies: 26
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 07:23 am
Bush has killed untold thousands in needless wars. And he opposes stem cell research thus destroying the possibility of cures for countless diseases and the alleviation of suffering. He has created the most massive deficit in history which our gradchi;ldren will still be paying off. He destroyed the nation of Iraq. C'mon Angie, with all the things he's doing how can he possibly find the time for the things you mentioned?
0 Replies
 
angie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 08:01 am
The items on the list above are things that never make it onto the general public's radar screen.

And the consequences of appointments such as the ones listed above are far reaching and will affect families for years after the W has gone back to the ranch.

But you're right, Nick, the horrors you mentioned make me think this should be a Top Twenty List, at least.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 08:22 am
I had just assumed that Nickfun had his toungue in his cheeck when he said that. You weren't serious about that list of nonsense, were you? Shocked
0 Replies
 
NeoGuin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:01 am
McGentrix:

Amazing what happens when people turn off Bush's media "Sheepdogs"

But there's more like this at

http://www.projectcensored.org
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:29 am
Hey McGentrix! What did I say that was false?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:47 am
NickFun wrote:
Bush has killed untold thousands in needless wars.


Let's start with this one. Osama started the first war by attacking the US. The Taliban regime was given some time to get their crap together and decide to hand ove OBL and other al Qaeda operatives to the US. They chose not to. The war in afghanistan was not needless.

Sadam Hussein had 12 years of fooling the UN and being a general pain in the global ass. He supported terrorism and harbored WMD's which if placed in the wrong hands could result in the death's of untold thousands of American lives. Saddam needed to go. Another war that needed to happen.

Now, in your OPINION, they be needless, and I am not one to say that your opinion is wrong, just that it doesn't agree with US policy.

Quote:
And he opposes stem cell research thus destroying the possibility of cures for countless diseases and the alleviation of suffering.


Bush does not oppose stem cell research. You are wrong on that one.

Quote:
He has created the most massive deficit in history which our gradchildren will still be paying off.


We will see. I am not as well read on economics as I could/should be as it bores the heck out of me.

Quote:
He destroyed the nation of Iraq.


Saddam did that. Bush is rebuilding Iraq.

Quote:
C'mon Angie, with all the things he's doing how can he possibly find the time for the things you mentioned?


So, there ya go. That's what you said that was false.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:51 am
Saying Bush is "rebuilding Iraq" is debatable, at best. Hardly a refutation of a falsehood.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:53 am
Really? Although he is not directly doing the building (didn't think I had to be so precise) he is the leader of the country that is primarily responsible for the rebuilding of Iraq?

Or do you mean something more by what you said?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 09:55 am
Quote:
And he opposes stem cell research thus destroying the possibility of cures for countless diseases and the alleviation of suffering.


Bush does not oppose stem cell research. You are wrong on that one. <--- McG

Will you please stop saying this? You know that his policies on stem cell research are hardly supportive. Must we go over again how badly this issue has been handled?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 10:38 am
McGentrix wrote:
Really? Although he is not directly doing the building (didn't think I had to be so precise) he is the leader of the country that is primarily responsible for the rebuilding of Iraq?

Or do you mean something more by what you said?


What I mean is, the country hardly seems under any kind of control, at least not the kind of control that the US and whatever authority we installed would want. So "rebuilding" seems to be a tenuous concept at the moment.

That's what I mean.
0 Replies
 
angie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 10:57 am
Bush opposes federal funding of EMBRYONIC stem cell research, the kind that offers the most promise genetically (according to scientists).

Clealy he is pandering to far right religious extremists who put this in the same category as abortion.

So, what about the original list posted here? Does it scare anyone ? Does it please anyone ?
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:02 am
It's scary Angie. The Bush regime is so out of touch with reality it's pathetic.
0 Replies
 
angie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:12 am
from the original list:

"Horn said that low-income kids whose parents aren't married should be last in line for Head Start and other benefits"

""The battered women's movement has outlived its useful beginnings."

""concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami."


quotes from BUSH APPOINTEES.



Hello ? Women of America ? Men, too ! Can you hear me ?
0 Replies
 
angie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:13 am
C'mon, McG, I KNOW you're listening .....
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:39 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
And he opposes stem cell research thus destroying the possibility of cures for countless diseases and the alleviation of suffering.


Bush does not oppose stem cell research. You are wrong on that one. <--- McG

Will you please stop saying this? You know that his policies on stem cell research are hardly supportive. Must we go over again how badly this issue has been handled?

Cycloptichorn


Apparently because some still think that he opposes it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:42 am
You know he certainly doesn't support it. At the very least, he tolerates it.

But he doesn't support it, because he doesn't understand it. Listening to him and Laura speak on the issue is enough to show anyone that...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:43 am
angie wrote:
Bush opposes federal funding of EMBRYONIC stem cell research, the kind that offers the most promise genetically (according to scientists).

Clealy he is pandering to far right religious extremists who put this in the same category as abortion.

So, what about the original list posted here? Does it scare anyone ? Does it please anyone ?


are you listening to what you are saying?

Bush opposes federal funding for creating more fetuses to be experimented on. That does not mean he opposes stem cell research, that doesn't mean he opposes embryonic stem cell research.

another thing, why is it always the far right religious extremeists? I am neither far right, or a religious extremeists and I oppose further embryonic stem cell research until experimentation on plants and animals proves without a doubt that the research is sound. So far it all theoretical. When they can regrow a brain in a mouse, maybe then we can have a further discussion about this issue.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 11:44 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You know he certainly doesn't support it. At the very least, he tolerates it.

But he doesn't support it, because he doesn't understand it. Listening to him and Laura speak on the issue is enough to show anyone that...

Cycloptichorn


So, in what universe does not supporting an issue equal oppossing it?
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Sep, 2004 12:04 pm
Wasn't it Bush himself who said, "Either you're with us or against us." In that universe...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Another Top Ten List - issues NOT being covered in the news
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/19/2025 at 09:48:18