@chowbarry,
You're welcome Chow, but now let me make a guess at the second
Moreover, after checking our records
, we understand that the planter
s(?) concerned
apparently had been
handed back returned to our office in May 2008
, but
apparently without the
apparent inclusion of the (its?) water point as
stated in required by the handover documents. Thus, the registered user of the water point ha
ds never been changed, leaving your office remaining
the as user
of the water point in the government record
By the way Chow, what the heck's a
water point anyway