1
   

Russia,Chechnya and other issues in the area

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 07:46 am
Hmm - I am reading with interest the Economist.com's take on this here:

http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3150096

(Not sure if you can see it without paying - so I will give a few important excerpts)


"Putin points the finger in the wrong direction


"Tuesday?s bombing in Moscow and the bombings of the two planes last week were purportedly claimed by the Islambouli Brigades, a group which (under the name ?Islambouli Brigades of al-Qaeda?) also said it was behind the attempted assassination of Pakistan?s prime-minister designate, Shaukat Aziz, at the end of July. The group is presumably named after Khalid al-Islambouli, who led the 1981 assassination of Egypt?s president, Anwar Sadat, and whose elder brother Muhammad al-Islambouli had ties to an Egyptian extremist group and a base in Afghanistan during the 1980s and 1990s. All this was enough for Vladimir Putin, Russia?s president, to call the latest statements attributed to the group ?a fact confirming the link between certain forces operating in Chechnya and international terrorism.?

That is a flimsy claim at best. Though there has been evidence of al-Qaeda links to some Chechen terrorists, the American State Department?s annual ?Patterns of Global Terrorism?, considered a standard reference, has never made any reference to the Islambouli Brigades.

In fact, the only signs that the group exists are three internet statements, of unconfirmed provenance, made in its name. Moreover, the attacks in Russia, like several previous ones to which no outside group lays claim, were carried out by young Chechen women. Many of these so-called ?black widows? have lost family members in the conflict. For instance, it has emerged that the suspected suicide bomber on one of the planes had a brother who disappeared after being detained by Russian forces.......


........Yet whether or not any al-Qaeda connection exists, the overriding cause of the latest attacks is that Russia has failed to find, and indeed has avoided looking for, a political solution in Chechnya. Unable, like his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, to quash the separatist conflict by military force, Mr Putin had tried to isolate it by appointing as regional president a local strongman, Akhmad Kadyrov, who tried to impose control with his own home-grown militia. That policy foundered when Mr Kadyrov was assassinated in May (possibly by the rebels, possibly not), while the conflict has splintered into a many-sided power struggle between the Kadyrov militia, rebel groups and federal forces, and factions within these. Mr Putin?s meeting with the French and German leaders came two days after an election for a new Chechen president, which, as expected, was won by Mr Putin?s candidate, Alu Alkhanov. Equally predictably, the election was denounced by local journalists and human-rights watchers, who documented widespread ballot-stuffing and fraud.

The carte blanche given to Russian security forces to abduct, torture and kill young Chechen men suspected of rebel ties spawned the ?black widow? phenomenon; and it is no longer confined to Chechnya. Ingushetia, which used to be fairly free of the arbitrary kidnappings that are common in Chechnya, has suffered at least 50 of them since the start of 2003, according to Memorial, a human-rights group. One Ingush local official, Galina Gubina, after surviving a car-bomb attack in May, said there had been 25 kidnappings in the previous three months.......
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 07:52 am
This is also an interesting article on Vakhabism (Wahhabism) in Chechnya.

An interesting part of the article is the fact that a large proportion of Chechens are following the Sufi version of Islam, and the article also states the following: "Unlike fundamentalists, Sufi Muslims do not fight for a religious cause and tend to have more reasonable positions on issues."
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 11:24 am
Quote:
Russia outraged by EU presidency comments on school raid

04 September 2004

Russia lashed out at the Dutch EU presidency on Saturday after The Hague demanded a full explanation of the Russian forces' handling of a school hostage crisis that left 322 people dead.

"The inappropriate comments of the Dutch minister are, to say the least, odious, and for the large part deeply offensive. We are waiting for an explanation from the Dutch side," the Russian foreign ministry said in a scorching statement.

Russia was "bewildered and outraged" by the comments, the text added.

Moscow said Tiddo Hofstee, the Dutch ambassador to Russia, was called in Saturday for a meeting with Deputy Foreign Minister Boris Chezhov, in which the latter said that "Moscow is expecting an official explantion" of the Dutch reaction.

Dutch Foreign Minister Bernard Bot, whose country holds the six-month European Union presidency, said Friday the EU was awaiting a full explanation from Moscow before making a judgment the Russian authorities' actions.

"It is premature now, without knowing the exact situation, to make a judgment on the way the Russian authorities acted," Bot told reporters.

Some 322 people, about half of them children, were killed after Russian forces stormed the school in the southern Russian region of North Ossetia to end the three-day hostage crisis.

Moscow has said the hostage-taking by guerrillas, some reportedly of Arab descent, demanding independence for Chechnya proved that Russia was under attack from international terror networks.

European nations have generally been more critical of Russia's campaign in Chechnya than the United States, which views Russia as an ally in the international "war on terror".

Text and Picture Copyright © 2004 AFP. All other copyright © 2004 EUbusiness Ltd
Source
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 12:06 pm
Already around 500 deads.
--
There is a strong suspicion about censorship and very dangerous exposure (unfortunaly again and again) with the journalists :

Prominent Journalist Reportedly Poisoned on Way to School Siege

Quote:

http://www.mosnews.com/files/3985/polit1.jpg
Anna Politkovskaya, an observer with the Novaya Gazeta newspaper, was rushed to an intensive care ward of the Central Hospital of Rostov-on-Don, southern Russia, with symptoms of acute food poisoning.

Politkovskaya rose to prominence as an outspoken liberal reporter and observer. She traveled extensively across Chechnya and is the author of several books about the war-torn province. In the Nord-Ost hostage crisis in 2002 Anna Politkovskaya together with pediatrician Leonid Roshal acted as a mediator in talks with the hostage-takers.

On 1 September, Anna Politkovskaya boarded a plane bound for Beslan, Dmitry Muratov, Novaya Gazeta editor-in-chief Dmitry Muratov told the NEWSru.com Web-site. During a stopover in Rostov-on-Don she felt unwell and lost consciousness. Diagnosed with food poisoning, she spent the whole day in the Rostov hospital. Her condition is still grave.

According to NG's editor, it all sounds very suspicious since Anna claimed she had not eaten anything for the whole day before landing in Rostov-on-Don, apart from a cup of tea she had on board.

Politkovskaya had planned to fly to Beslan together with Leonid Roshal, but she was not allowed on board along with several other journalists.

By Thursday evening Politkovskaya felt better and was transported to a Moscow hospital. At 23-30 her plane landed in Moscow.

Another journalist, Radio Liberty's Andrei Babitsky, also failed to complete a journey to the scene of the hostage crisis on Thursday. He was detained in Moscow's Vnukovo airport for apparently being involved in a fight. The journalist claimed he was accused of carrying explosives.


Mosnews
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:01 pm
For what I know, the Dutch minister has already taken his comments back, but I'm not sure. Anyway, the article says the Dutch foreign minister is called Bernard Bot, but for what I know, his name is Ben Bot. Just a detail.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:30 pm
Rick d'Israeli wrote:
Anyway, the article says the Dutch foreign minister is called Bernard Bot, but for what I know, his name is Ben Bot. Just a detail.


Dr. Bernard Rudolf Bot ...
http://www.government.nl/bewindslieden/cabinet/minbot.jsp
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:32 pm
Surprised He lied to us! He said his name was BEN Bot! <Shock>
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:33 pm
And thanks for the link Walter :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:33 pm
Rick d'Israeli wrote:
For what I know, the Dutch minister has already taken his comments back, but I'm not sure.




Quote:
Dutch FM pledges to clear up misunderstanding with Moscow
04 September 2004

Dutch Foreign Minister Bernard Bot pledged Saturday to clear up a regrettable "misunderstanding" with Russia over comments on the Russian hostage crisis, which sparked outrage in Moscow.

In his first public comments since the Russian foreign ministry issued a scathing rebuke to the comments, he said he would "set the record straight" in talks with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov later in the day.

"I think my comments, consciously or unconsciously, have been misinterpreted. I think that is a shame," he said, adding that "I will certainly set the record straight with my colleague Lavrov later in the day."

In the disputed remarks, made in a written English-language statement issued late Friday, Bot said that: "All countries in the world need to work together to prevent tragedies like this.

"But we also would like to know from the Russian authorities how this tragedy could have happened," he said.

The Russian foreign ministry reacted Saturday by issuing its own statement lashing out at the EU presidency, calling Bot's comments "to say the least, odious, and for the large part deeply offensive."

Bot, speaking at the end of a two-day meeting of EU foreign ministers which was clouded by the Russian hostage drama, reiterated what he had said the previous day.

"After questions ... were put to me I said it was difficult to answer them because I had at that moment not more information than you had and what I have seen on the television and what I have heard on radio."

"I said that, in the context of the fact that we are dealing with a global scourge, a global danger, it would be very useful if there were more intensive cooperation between all countries in the world, both in the preliminary stage, trying to prevent such things happening and in the aftermath because we can all learn from each other."

"I think my words have been misinterpreted. I have never said that I needed to be clarified or informed," he added, speaking in English.

Earlier Bot's spokesman also defended the remarks.

"The Russians apparently think we were sitting on a high horse and demanding explanations or something. But that was not the case," Bot spokesman Bart Jochems told AFP.

"It was simply a question: 'We do not have the details, we cannot judge, but we'd like to know the details in order to better understand and to help each other to combat terrorism,'" he added.

"We don't think there's any harm in what the minister said. We're actually saying to the Russian authorities that we want to work together in combating terrorism."
Source
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 03:39 pm
Could the Russian reaction indicate something is not totally kosher here?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 05:06 pm
Hmmmm......
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Sep, 2004 05:08 pm
Well, there is the Yukos debacle going on, and Putin recently provided some retroactive justification for the Shrub's claims about pre-war intelligence on Iraq . . . wonder if there will be any quid pro quo in the offing . . .
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Sep, 2004 01:40 am
Yesterday, the first victims were buried . Irresponsible that nobody from Kremlin was there.

----
There a analyse,again:

Defenseless Targets

Quote:


complete analyse
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 01:31 am
Irresponsible, just Irresponsible:

Angry Putin rejects public Beslan inquiry

Quote:
The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, last night refused to order a public inquiry into how the Beslan school was captured by gunmen and then ended with such a high death toll, and told the Guardian that people who call for talks with Chechen leaders have no conscience.

"Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace? Why don't you do that?" he said with searing sarcasm.

"You find it possible to set some limitations in your dealings with these bastards, so why should we talk to people who are childkillers?

"No one has a moral right to tell us to talk to childkillers," he added.

"Correct me if I'm wrong, but Margaret Thatcher, whom I've met more than once said: 'A man who comes out into the street to kill other people must himself be killed'," he told the Guardian.

At times grim-faced, but always calm, Mr Putin's comments came in the midst of an extraordinary three-and-a-half-hour meeting with a group of foreign journalists and academics with long experience of Russia, invited for a special conference.

Held in his country house outside Moscow, the question-and-answer session ended after midnight. It was his first meeting with foreigners since the Beslan catastrophe.

He said he would hold an internal inquiry into the Beslan tragedy, but not a public one. "I want to establish the chronicle of events and find out who is responsible and might be punished," he said.


complete report
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 01:40 am
The Independent, whose reporter was attending this 'talk time' with Putin as well, gives a slightly different report:

Quote:
Putin vents his anger at the West: Don't tell me to talk to child-killers
At a time of national crisis, Mary Dejevsky is granted a rare audience with the Russian President
07 September 2004


Three days after the bloody end of the school siege in North Ossetia, the Russian President has attacked Western countries for observing double standards on terrorism, asking why they insisted on calling Chechen separatists "rebels'' while they always branded those responsible for the 11 September attacks in the United States as "terrorists''.

In an unexpected change of tone, however, Vladimir Putin also held out the prospect of a more conciliatory line towards Chechnya, praising Chechen traditions and suggesting there was a possibility of broad-based parliamentary elections there.

Mr Putin was answering questions from an international group of Russian specialists and journalists, including The Independent, at his residence at Novo Ogarevo, outside Moscow. In a wide-ranging conversation, which lasted for three and a half hours and ended only after midnight, Mr Putin said that Russia was quite prepared to show flexibility towards the rebellious region of Chechnya in future, but "not with those who do not stop at shooting children''.

His fists clenched, he said: "No one has the right to advise us to talk to people like that. I don't advise you to meet Bin Laden, invite him to Brussels and Nato or the White House, hold talks with him, and let him dictate what he wants so that he will then leave you alone. But you tell us that we should talk to everyone, including child-killers.''

Mr Putin had begun talking about Russia's problem with Chechen separatism in a much softer tone, however, charting a history of Russian- Chechen relations in which he paid tribute to the bravery of Chechens during the Second World War. Then, he said, they had probably had more heroes proportionately than any other ethnic group. One third of those defending the fortress at Brest on the Western Front were Chechens, and they had stood "until the very last bullet and the last drop of blood'', refusing to surrender, he said.

Mr Putin forcefully condemned what he said were serious mistakes made by Soviet leaders in dealing with the Chechens, starting with Stalin's order that expelled them from their homeland in the Caucasus to Central Asia and the far north of Russia. Many thousands died on the journey. "I have been to the camps in the far north and even today it's frightening to see,'' Mr Putin said. All these injustices together "could not but lead to separatism''.

Seeming to extend an olive branch to a much broader swath of Chechen opinion than hitherto, Mr Putin said: "We will continue our dialogue with civil society. This will include holding parliamentary elections, trying to get as many people as possible involved, with as many views and policies as possible.'' One of the big criticisms of Russia's policy in Chechnya is that it has held presidential elections from which the more popular opposition figures have been excluded, but delayed parliamentary elections.

Mr Putin gave a clear indication that he was open to the holding of parliamentary elections in Chechnya - although he did not give a date - in the hope of drawing many more people into the political process. He also said that the intention was to "strengthen law enforcement by staffing the police and other bodies in Chechnya with Chechens''.

The two moves together would amount to the continuation, even acceleration, of the policy of "Chechenisation'', which some believed would be reversed after the spate of recent attacks in Russia: the downing of two planes, a bomb near a Moscow underground station, and, last week, the siege of School Number One in Beslan that cost more than 300 lives.

In a little-noticed move two weeks before the attacks, the Russian government had decreed that Chechnya should be able to keep revenue from its oil, rather than remit the proceeds to Russia as currently happens. This was a major change in policy and one that irritated other regions that do not enjoy a similar right.

Mr Putin insisted, however, that Russia would retain troops in Chechnya. Their withdrawal is one of the separatists' main objectives. Russia had as much right to keep troops in the region as the US has to station its troops "in California or Texas'', he said.

Asked about human rights violations by Russian troops in Chechnya, Mr Putin again went on the attack, saying: "Compare the torture of Iraqi prisoners. This hasn't happened on the direction of the top US leaders, but because of how individual people behaved in these circumstances. Those who are to blame must be punished.''

Russian troops had been responsible for "ugly phenomena'' in Chechnya, Mr Putin admitted, but this too was a product of the circumstances, he said, and the perpetrators were punished.

The Russian President also appeared to extend an invitation to foreign countries to assist with reconstruction in Chechnya - the first time that Russia has come near to soliciting any outside involvement. "We need to rehabilitate society in Chechnya to know there is another sort of life, and we would appreciate assistance with that.''
Source
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 11:10 am
Russia School Seizure Was Long Planned
There is a lesson to be learned for the planning tactics used in this terrorist attack. ---BBB
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 11:23 pm
A video from inside the school is published, here the report:

The unimaginable horror inside School Number One

Quote:
Russian television has broadcast horrific and haunting pictures from inside the Beslan school during the three-day siege, showing the masked attackers with the captive schoolchildren - and bombs tied to basketball hoops in the gym.

The graphic video showed the 1,000 seated children and their teachers, some semi-naked in the heat, crowded into the gym and guarded by their captors who included masked and armed men and a woman in a black headdress.

The terrorised hostages were holding their hands behind their heads. One terrorist walked through the gym, packed with hostages, where a trail of smeared blood could be seen. Another crouched beside the bomb he was preparing that could be primed to blow up at any moment. A teacher in a red dress was helping two pupils move towards the door, filmed by a camera used by the attackers to record their crime.

One dressed in camouflage and a black hood stood with a boot on what the Russian NTV network said was a book rigged with a detonator. The woman militant stood in a doorway holding a pistol beside her head. There was also footage of a rocket-propelled grenade launcher lying on the floor.

One of the attackers was heard talking on a mobile phone at the end of the one-and-a half minute video. He was not speaking in Russian - a revelation that could boost the official theory that the hostage-takers were international terrorists.

More than 335 people - including 156 children - died in the dramatic and bloody end to the three-day siege, when Russian forces stormed the North Ossetia school where the hostages were held by a suicide commando calling for Chechen independence.

The images were shown soon after Russians had taken to the streets in their hundreds of thousands in rallies across the country to denounce terrorism. Responding to appeals from President Vladimir Putin's party, more than 130,000 people converged on Red Square.

Waves of people crossed the bridge towards the Kremlin walls carrying Russian and Soviet flags. Their banners proclaimed: "Children are our future, defend them." "Russia's heart is in Beslan today," said another. Other banners had a more overt political message, saying: "We won't give Russia to terrorists" and "The enemy will be crushed; victory will be ours".

Security was tight. Speakers echoed Mr Putin's statements that terrorists must be crushed. But there was no doubt the entire Russian nation wanted to express its solidarity with the victims.

Similar rallies were staged across Russia, including in Vladikavkaz, the capital of North Ossetia, where speakers called for the resignations of local politicians. Smaller demonstrations against terrorism were also held in the capitals of former Soviet republics including Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

Opposition politicians said the Moscow rally was intended to counter criticism of the Kremlin's handling of the crisis, which ended with the botched storming of the school on Friday as armed locals broke through a security cordon.

At an unprecedented three-and-a-half hour meeting with a group of foreign journalists and academics at his residence on Monday, Mr Putin was scathing about calls from the West for him to negotiate with Chechen separatists.

"No one has the right to advise us to talk to people like that. I don't advise you to meet (Osama) bin Laden, hold talks with him, and let him dictate what he wants so that he will then leave you alone. But you tell us that we should talk to everyone, including child killers."

The Russian defence minister, Sergei Ivanov, said yesterday that "not a single Chechen" had been identified among the bodies of the 30 hostage-takers. He said there was one Russian and a couple of Ingush among the dead hostage-takers, half of whom have now been identified. But Russian authorities seem unwilling to give details for fear of unleashing revenge attacks on the ethnic groups involved.

Three hostage-takers were captured by the Russian forces, and one has accused the elected Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov, and the Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev, of having ordered the hostage-taking. Mr Maskhadov's spokesman Akhmed Zakayev denies the Chechen leader was involved and says the attack was aimed at discrediting Mr Maskhadov's faction.

The European Union advocates a political solution to the 10-year Chechen conflict and outraged Russia by asking for an explanation of the conduct of Russian special forces.

"What would the Spanish have said if we had asked them to explain their actions after the Madrid bombing?" said a defence ministry source yesterday, unable to contain his anger.


Link
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Sep, 2004 12:52 am
http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,387885,00.jpg


http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,387894,00.jpg


http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,387890,00.jpg
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Sep, 2004 11:34 am
Russia prepared for terror base preemptive strikes worldwide
Russia prepared for pre-emptive strikes on 'terror bases' worldwide
Wed Sep 8, 5:43 AM ET

MOSCOW (AFP) - Russia is prepared to make pre-emptive strikes on "terrorist bases" anywhere in the world, the Interfax news agency cited the country's chief of staff as saying.

"With regard to preventive strikes on terrorist bases, we will take any action to eliminate terrorist bases in any region of the world. But this does not mean we will carry out nuclear strikes," General Yuri Baluyevsky said Wednesday.

Baluyevsky added that Russia's choice of action "will be determined by the concrete situation where ever it may be in the world.

"Military action is the last resort in the fight agaisnt terrorism."
----------------------------------------

£5.6m to 'neutralise' rebels

Russia has put a £6 million bounty on the head of two Chechen leaders it suspects of being behind the school siege bloodbath and pledged to go after terrorists world wide.

A likely target, who has been granted refugee status in Britain, said he feared Russian death squads would be sent to operate in western Europe.

The hard line emanating from the Kremlin - authorised by President Vladimir Putin - came as more details emerged of what happened in the Beslan School in the Caucasus.

At one point there was dissent among the 30 assailants and their leader, known as the Colonel, blew up the two women in the gang with their own suicide bombs.

The announcements in Moscow marked a show of resolve aimed at Russia's stunned citizens, as well as Western countries Putin accuses of hindering its fight against terror, in the wake of three astounding attacks that killed more than 400 people in the past two weeks.

The Federal Security Service (FSB) - successor to the KGB - offered a reward of almost £6 million for information that could help "neutralise" warlord Shamil Basayev and former Chechen President Aslan Maskhadov, separatist leaders Russian officials claim were behind the school attack.

"As for carrying out preventive strikes against terrorist bases ... we will take all measures to liquidate terrorist bases in any region of the world," said Colonel General Your Baluyevsky, chief of the general staff of Russia's armed forces.

Russian leaders have claimed such a right before, flexing the nuclear-armed former superpower's muscles and tacitly threatening tiny neighbouring Georgia that Moscow would pursue Chechen rebels allegedly sheltering on its territory.

Two Russian agents were convicted this year in Qatar for a February car bombing there that killed another Chechen rebel leader. Russian authorities have denied involvement in the assassination.
-----------------------------------
Russian vow 'a threat to everyone'

Russia's threat to target "terrorists anywhere" is a danger to Britain, Europe and the rest of the world, a top Chechen separatist based in the UK has warned.

Akhmed Zakayev said the vow meant Russia may try to assassinate Chechens wherever they are, regardless of international boundaries.

And he warned that sent out a "very disturbing signal to all civilised countries".

Mr Zakayev, an envoy for Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov, also rejected claims by Russia that he should face a renewed extradition attempt following the Beslan school massacre.

The separatist, who has been granted asylum, spoke out after Colonel General Yuri Baluyevsky, chief of the Russian General Staff. reasserted the country's right to strike at terrorists the world over.

Mr Zakayev said: "I think these are probably not empty threats, in fact they have already shown in practice that that is the way they do things.

"It is a very disturbing signal they are sending for all civilised countries.

"There are lots of Chechens all over the world and of course they talk freely about how dissatisfied they are with Putin's policies.

"To Putin, that makes them international terrorists. It is a warning to other European countries that Russia may come and carry out an assassination on your soil at any moment."

In February this year, two Russian agents assassinated Chechen rebel leader Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev in a car bomb attack in Qatar.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Sep, 2004 12:00 pm
Fighting for Chechnya: Is Islam a Factor?
Fighting for Chechnya: Is Islam a Factor?
By Thomas de Waal - PBS

Thomas de Waal, is a London-based journalist, who writes on Russia and the Caucasus. He is co-author, with Carlotta Gall, of "Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus," (New York University Press, 1998). He is currently Caucasus Editor with the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, www.iwpr.net, in London.
------------------------------------------------

Islamic fundamentalism in Chechnya is a much misunderstood problem. It exists -- but only as a consequence of the war between Chechens and Moscow.

Both Russians and hard-line fighters have an interest in talking up the Islamic factor. The most radical Chechen guerrillas, in their propaganda material disseminated through the Web site kakvkaz.org describe their fighters as "mujahadin" or "martyrs," fighting a "jihad" or holy war against the Russian armed forces. That helps them raise money for weapons and supplies in mosques from London to Jeddah.

Russia points out that these radical fighters had a link to the Al Qaeda movement through a Saudi-born warrior of fortune known as Ibn ul-Khattab, who had fought in Afghanistan, and moved to Chechnya in 1995. Khattab, a professional "mujahadin" fighter who sported thick curly shoulder-length black hair, was reported murdered by poisoning in Chechnya in March.

It recently came to light that Ayman Al-Zawahri, Osama Bin Laden's right-hand man spent six months in a Russian jail, after trying to infiltrate Chechnya in 1996. He was travelling under a false name and his cover was not blown. After his release, he settled in Afghanistan.

After September 11, Russia's president Vladimir Putin was quick to use evidence like this to prove to the United States that he was an stalwart ally in the fight against "Islamic terror" -- only, as he repeatedly pointed out, Russia had already been fighting the terrorists in Chechnya for years, not months.

This message succeeded in further softening Western criticism of Russia's brutal military campaign. "Russia is fighting terrorists in Chechnya, there's no question about that, and we understand that," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said in May. At the same time, the U.S. sent military trainers to Georgia, on the other side of the Caucasus mountains from Chechnya, to try to help the local security forces clean up the Pankisi Gorge region of Islamic militants.

And yet most of this is based on a big misunderstanding of what is really going on in Chechnya.

Proclaiming independence from Moscow in 1991, Chechnya's first rebel president, Jokhar Dudayev, declared a secular state. Dudayev, a former Soviet general, was so ignorant about Islam that he once famously advised his citizens that, as good Muslims, they should pray three - and not five - times a day.

Dudayev's cause was a nationalist one - freeing Chechnya, as he put it, from "two hundred years of persecution" by the Russian state. For him, the key date in Chechen history was Stalin's mass deportation of the Chechen people to Central Asia in 1944. Dudayev frequently said he was ready to have close economic and political ties with Russia, so long as "historical justice" was restored to his people.

Islam began to be a factor only after Moscow's first military intervention against Dudayev in December 1994. At the start of armed resistance to the Russians, many Chechens looked for inspiration to their history or to the war against the Russians in Afghanistan. Fighters, many of whom had been drinking vodka a few years before, wound green Islamic headbands around their heads and learned how to pray.

Lack of money also proved critical. When Khattab arrived in Chechnya in 1995, he brought promises of Saudi funding - and made grisly publicity videos of his attacks on Russian soldiers to entice potential funders in the Middle East. Yet Khattab was one of only perhaps a few dozen Arab fighters who came to fight in Chechnya.

In fact, most Chechens remained very suspicious of the incoming Middle East zealots, like Khattab, known as "Wahhabis" because of their allegiance to a particularly austere form of Sunni Islam. Most Chechen Muslims by contrast are adherents of the mystical Sufi form of Islam and pray at home rather than in the mosques. They visit shrines and say prayers at the tombs of their ancestors. The women do not wear veils. Local traditions tend to be stronger than Muslim observance. Even in the 1840s and 1850s, when the Islamic chieftain Imam Shamil led resistance to the Russian tsar's armies in the region, he said that the Chechens were good warriors, but bad Muslims. He was unable to stop them smoking, playing music and dancing.

Proof that good guerrillas did not necessarily make good fundamentalists was in evidence in 1996, after the rebels had won their first military victory against the Russians. The separatists tried to introduce Islamic Sharia courts into Chechnya and order beatings for anyone convicted of drinking or drug abuse. Yet one high-profile Sharia judge turned out, when interviewed, to be an almost comic bundle of contradictions. Jumbalat Samkhatov was a former soccer player, who said he took his duties very seriously and admired the Taliban. He was also a typical Chechen, hazy about Islamic doctrine, laughing, chain-smoking Marlboros and flirting with a woman photographer colleague.

Samkhatov was the rule, not the exception. Apart from a few high-profile cases, Sharia justice never caught on in Chechnya. To settle their disputes Chechens continued to use their tried and traditional methods - the verdict of respected elders or the firearms of young men.

The two strains in Chechnya of support and opposition for radical Islam diverged so strongly that armed supporters of Dudayev's successor as rebel president, Aslan Maskhadov, fought a small civil war with fundamentalist Chechens in 1998.

The second Russian military intervention in October 1999 and thousands more civilian casualties have radicalised Chechnya again and inevitably made Islamic fundamentalism more attractive to young Chechens. Yet this war's links to the "war on terror" remain oblique and confusing. If the Arab volunteers in Chechnya went home and all foreign funding for the rebels ceased, radical Islam would again fade as a factor in the conflict. But the deep underlying - and overwhelmingly political - problems that divide most ordinary Chechens from Russia would still remain.

After September 11, Russia's president Vladimir Putin was quick to use evidence like this to prove to the United States that he was an stalwart ally in the fight against "Islamic terror" -- only, as he repeatedly pointed out, Russia had already been fighting the terrorists in Chechnya for years, not months.

This message succeeded in further softening Western criticism of Russia's brutal military campaign. "Russia is fighting terrorists in Chechnya, there's no question about that, and we understand that," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said in May. At the same time, the U.S. sent military trainers to Georgia, on the other side of the Caucasus mountains from Chechnya, to try to help the local security forces clean up the Pankisi Gorge region of Islamic militants.

And yet most of this is based on a big misunderstanding of what is really going on in Chechnya.

Proclaiming independence from Moscow in 1991, Chechnya's first rebel president, Jokhar Dudayev, declared a secular state. Dudayev, a former Soviet general, was so ignorant about Islam that he once famously advised his citizens that, as good Muslims, they should pray three - and not five - times a day.

Dudayev's cause was a nationalist one - freeing Chechnya, as he put it, from "two hundred years of persecution" by the Russian state. For him, the key date in Chechen history was Stalin's mass deportation of the Chechen people to Central Asia in 1944. Dudayev frequently said he was ready to have close economic and political ties with Russia, so long as "historical justice" was restored to his people.

Islam began to be a factor only after Moscow's first military intervention against Dudayev in December 1994. At the start of armed resistance to the Russians, many Chechens looked for inspiration to their history or to the war against the Russians in Afghanistan. Fighters, many of whom had been drinking vodka a few years before, wound green Islamic headbands around their heads and learned how to pray.

Lack of money also proved critical. When Khattab arrived in Chechnya in 1995, he brought promises of Saudi funding - and made grisly publicity videos of his attacks on Russian soldiers to entice potential funders in the Middle East. Yet Khattab was one of only perhaps a few dozen Arab fighters who came to fight in Chechnya.

In fact, most Chechens remained very suspicious of the incoming Middle East zealots, like Khattab, known as "Wahhabis" because of their allegiance to a particularly austere form of Sunni Islam. Most Chechen Muslims by contrast are adherents of the mystical Sufi form of Islam and pray at home rather than in the mosques. They visit shrines and say prayers at the tombs of their ancestors. The women do not wear veils. Local traditions tend to be stronger than Muslim observance. Even in the 1840s and 1850s, when the Islamic chieftain Imam Shamil led resistance to the Russian tsar's armies in the region, he said that the Chechens were good warriors, but bad Muslims. He was unable to stop them smoking, playing music and dancing.

Proof that good guerrillas did not necessarily make good fundamentalists was in evidence in 1996, after the rebels had won their first military victory against the Russians. The separatists tried to introduce Islamic Sharia courts into Chechnya and order beatings for anyone convicted of drinking or drug abuse. Yet one high-profile Sharia judge turned out, when interviewed, to be an almost comic bundle of contradictions. Jumbalat Samkhatov was a former soccer player, who said he took his duties very seriously and admired the Taliban. He was also a typical Chechen, hazy about Islamic doctrine, laughing, chain-smoking Marlboros and flirting with a woman photographer colleague.

Samkhatov was the rule, not the exception. Apart from a few high-profile cases, Sharia justice never caught on in Chechnya. To settle their disputes Chechens continued to use their tried and traditional methods - the verdict of respected elders or the firearms of young men.

The two strains in Chechnya of support and opposition for radical Islam diverged so strongly that armed supporters of Dudayev's successor as rebel president, Aslan Maskhadov, fought a small civil war with fundamentalist Chechens in 1998.

The second Russian military intervention in October 1999 and thousands more civilian casualties have radicalised Chechnya again and inevitably made Islamic fundamentalism more attractive to young Chechens. Yet this war's links to the "war on terror" remain oblique and confusing. If the Arab volunteers in Chechnya went home and all foreign funding for the rebels ceased, radical Islam would again fade as a factor in the conflict. But the deep underlying - and overwhelmingly political - problems that divide most ordinary Chechens from Russia would still remain.

Fast Facts

1722 -- First known battle between Chechen fighters and Russian soldiers results in defeat for Peter the Great.
1944 -- Stalin deports the entire Chechen nation to Siberia and Central Asia as suspected German collaborators.
1991 -- Chechnya declares its independence.
1994-1996 -- War with Russia results in de facto independence for Chechnya.
1999-Present -- Russia re-invades Chechnya. As Russian military losses continue, a refugee crisis builds in neighboring Ingushetia.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 02:47:52