1
   

Columnist Robert Novak has ties to Anti-Kerry book

 
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Sep, 2004 02:42 pm
...and how do you know I'm lying? When was the last time you supplied her with hair mousse?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Sep, 2004 02:50 pm
Back to the scare floor LW.

What is a salt pancake?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Sep, 2004 02:54 pm
I'll let dys explain -- I'm busy watching Federer and Hewitt.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Sep, 2004 03:00 pm
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=33541
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Sep, 2004 01:44 am
blatham wrote:
Let's add a second 'nice principle'...that your apprehension of real states of affairs is always more dependable than another with whom you disagree.

Of course. After all, if you convinced me that your apprehension is more dependable than mine, I'd change my mind and have a different apprehension. Same logic as above, and no, it's not all sophistery. There are people in this community, perhaps even in this thread, who have seen me change my mind in response to good arguments.

Lightwizard wrote:
I E mailed Cameron Diaz with your pic, thomas, and she did said no.

Alas, I thought she would. Thanks for trying anyway!
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Sep, 2004 02:59 am
blatham wrote:
We are the same creatures, biologically, that came down out of the steppes hacking for fun, or that pulled Irishmen apart with horses (hi george) to the cheers of the local townsfolk. All that keeps us as safe as we are are these fragile institutions of government. It wasn't Dow.

Point 1) Who told the English soldiers to pull those Irishmen apart? Were English kings, counts, mayors or other state institutions involved in any way?

Point 2) The question is, how much government? Medieval Iceland maintained a crime rate comparable to modern America's with a government consisting of just one part-time employee, the lawspeaker. (An online source on this topic is available here. A book-sized reference is Jesse L. Byock: Viking Age Iceland)

Government in the 19th century American West was somewhat larger than medieval Iceland's, but still much smaller than it is today. And contrary to Hollywood legends, the crime rate in the Wild West was no higher than it was in the eastern states of America at the same time. A good summary is Anderson and Hill: The not so Wild Wild West (PDF here). It has the disadvantage of having been published in the Journal of Libertarian Studies, so was probably peer-reviewed for ideological as much as factual correctness. But I have checked the cited facts against peer-reviewed scholarly publications by historians, notably Clyde A. Miller: The Oxford History of the American West. The facts turn out to be consistent between the sources, though the interpretations turn out not to be.

The point I'm trying to make with these examples is that the good things we can expect from government can be gotten from governments much smaller than ours. And the bad things (changing regimes around the world, highjacking school systems for the teachers unions, selling out national forests to the lumber industry, selling out the airwaves to friendly broadcasters) are made much worse because governments are as big as they currently are. That's why I don't want to abolish governments alltogether, but want them much smaller and weaker than they currently are.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2025 at 11:15:44